Abstract
Objective Mental disorders often emerge during adolescence and have been associated with age-related differences in connection strengths of brain networks (static connectivity), manifesting in non-typical developmental trajectories of brain maturation. However, little is known about the directionality of information flow (directed connectivity) in this period of brain development.
Methods We employed dynamic graphical models (DGM) to estimate directed functional connectivity from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data on 1143 participants, aged 6 to 17 years from the healthy brain network (HBN) sample. We tested for effects of age, sex, cognitive abilities and psychopathology on directionality.
Results We show robust bi-directionality in information flow between visual-medial and visual-lateral networks, in line with prior studies investigating this in adults. Furthermore, we found that age in this developmental sample was associated with directionality of information flow for sensorimotor, auditory, and control networks, and that cognition was linked to directionality between the visual occipital and the default mode network. However, we did not find associations with psychopathology.
Discussion Our results revealed that directionality in information flow of large-scale brain networks is sensitive to age and cognition during adolescence, warranting further studies that may explore trajectories of development in more fine-grained network parcellations and in different populations.
Competing Interest Statement
OAA is a consultant for HealthLytix.
Funding Statement
The authors were funded by the Research Council of Norway #276082 (LifespanHealth), #223273 (NORMENT), #249795, #298646, #300767, #283798; H2020 European Research Council #802998 (BRAINMINT); The South-East Norway Regional Health Authority #2019101, #2019107, #2020086; Swiss National Science Foundation #171598
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Chesapeake Institutional Review Board approved the study (https://www.chesapeakeirb.com/).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data incorporated in this work were gathered from the open access Healthy Brain Network resource. Software needed to estimate directed connectivity is available at https://github.com/schw4b/DGM.
