Abstract
Governments around the world have adopted unprecedented policies to deal with COVID-19. This paper zooms in on business shutdowns and investigates their effectiveness in reducing mortality. We leverage upon highly granular death registry data for over 4,000 Italian municipalities in a diff-in-diff approach that allows us to credibly mitigate endogeneity concerns. Our results, which are robust to controlling for a host of co-factors, offer strong evidence that business shutdowns are very effective in reducing mortality. We calculate that the death toll from the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy would have been twice as high in their absence. Our findings also highlight that timeliness is key – by acting one week earlier, the government could have reduced the death toll by an additional 25%. Finally, our estimates suggest that shutdowns should be targeted: closing shops, bars and restaurants saves the most lives, while shutting down manufacturing and construction activities has only mild effects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding to declare
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No clinical trials/patients involved
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the OECD or its member countries. We are deeply grateful to Travers Barclay Child, Hans Genberg, Coen van der Kraats and Eli Remolona for extensive discussions in the early stages of this project. We also thank Richard Baldwin, Xu Bin, Emanuele Ciani, Jacopo Cimadomo, Owen O’Donnell, Viktar Fedaseyeu, Massimo Giuliodori, Pilar Garcia-Gómez, Sergi Jiménez-Martín, Luca Marcolin, Anella Munro, Magdalena Rola-Janicka, Jonathan Stȯterau, Stefan Thewissen and webinar participants at the ECB, the OECD and CEIBS for helpful feedback and interest on the paper.
↵† Ciminelli: Asia School of Business (gabriele.ciminelli{at}asb.edu.my), MIT Sloan School of Management (gcimin{at}mit.edu); Garcia-Mandicó: Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD (Silvia.Garcia-Mandico{at}oecd.org)
JEL Codes: I10, I18, I30, J44
Data Availability
Data available upon request