Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Updating Herd Immunity Models for the U.S. in 2020: Implications for the COVID-19 Response

View ORCID ProfileNatalie E. Sheils, Gregory D. Lyng, Ethan M. Berke
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.20207100
Natalie E. Sheils
1UnitedHealth Group, Research and Development, Minnetonka, MN 55343 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalie E. Sheils
Gregory D. Lyng
1UnitedHealth Group, Research and Development, Minnetonka, MN 55343 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ethan M. Berke
1UnitedHealth Group, Research and Development, Minnetonka, MN 55343 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ethan.berke@uhg.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To understand what levels of herd immunity are required in the COVID-19 pandemic, given spatial population heterogeneity, to best inform policy and action.

Methods Using a network of counties in the United States connected by transit data we considered a set of coupled differential equations for susceptible-infectious-removed populations. We calculated the classical herd immunity level plus a version reflecting the heterogeneity of connections in the network by running the model forward in time until the epidemic completed.

Results Necessary levels of herd immunity vary greatly from county to county. A population weighted average for the United States is 47.5% compared to a classically estimated level of 77.1%.

Conclusions Common thinking argues that the nation needs to achieve at least 60% herd immunity to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic. Heterogeneity in contact structure and individual variation in infectivity, susceptibility, and resistance are key factors that reduce the disease-induced herd immunity levels to 34.2–47.5% in our models. Looking forward toward vaccination strategies, these results suggest we should consider not just who is vaccinated but where those vaccinations will do the most good.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

no external funding to report

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This research is deemed exempt by the UnitedHealth Group IRB

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

all data is available via the New York Times

https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 06, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Updating Herd Immunity Models for the U.S. in 2020: Implications for the COVID-19 Response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Updating Herd Immunity Models for the U.S. in 2020: Implications for the COVID-19 Response
Natalie E. Sheils, Gregory D. Lyng, Ethan M. Berke
medRxiv 2020.10.05.20207100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.20207100
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Updating Herd Immunity Models for the U.S. in 2020: Implications for the COVID-19 Response
Natalie E. Sheils, Gregory D. Lyng, Ethan M. Berke
medRxiv 2020.10.05.20207100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.20207100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (305)
  • Allergy and Immunology (601)
  • Anesthesia (152)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2163)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (267)
  • Dermatology (198)
  • Emergency Medicine (354)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (761)
  • Epidemiology (11399)
  • Forensic Medicine (9)
  • Gastroenterology (658)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3419)
  • Geriatric Medicine (327)
  • Health Economics (598)
  • Health Informatics (2196)
  • Health Policy (889)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (833)
  • Hematology (323)
  • HIV/AIDS (725)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12999)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (737)
  • Medical Education (345)
  • Medical Ethics (94)
  • Nephrology (364)
  • Neurology (3208)
  • Nursing (186)
  • Nutrition (494)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (626)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (637)
  • Oncology (1693)
  • Ophthalmology (505)
  • Orthopedics (202)
  • Otolaryngology (278)
  • Pain Medicine (215)
  • Palliative Medicine (61)
  • Pathology (426)
  • Pediatrics (967)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (404)
  • Primary Care Research (383)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2970)
  • Public and Global Health (5835)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1181)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (687)
  • Respiratory Medicine (791)
  • Rheumatology (354)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (336)
  • Sports Medicine (300)
  • Surgery (369)
  • Toxicology (50)
  • Transplantation (167)
  • Urology (138)