Abstract
Background Intrahospital transfers have become more common as hospital staff balance patient needs with bed availability. However, this may leave patients more vulnerable to potential pathogen transmission routes via increased exposure to contaminated surfaces and contacts with individuals.
Objective This study aimed to quantify the association between the number of intrahospital transfers undergone during a hospital spell and the development of a hospital-acquired infection (HAI).
Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted using data extracted from electronic health records and microbiology cultures of non-elective, medical admissions to a large urban hospital trust comprising 3 hospital sites between 2016 and 2018 (n=24,239). As elderly patients comprise a large proportion of hospital users and are a high-risk population for HAIs, the analysis focused on those over 65-years old. Logistic regression was conducted to obtain the odds ratio (OR) for developing a HAI as a function of intrahospital transfers until onset of HAI for cases, or hospital discharge for controls, while controlling for age, gender, time-at-risk, Elixhauser comorbidities, hospital site of admission, dominant treatment function code, intensive care admission, total number of procedures, and discharge destination.
Results Of the 24,239 spells, 2879 cases were included in the analysis. 72.2% of spells contained at least one intrahospital transfer. On multivariable analysis, each additional intrahospital transfer increased the odds of acquiring a HAI by 9% (OR 1.09; 95%CI 1.05 to 1.13).
Conclusion Intrahospital transfers are associated with increased odds of developing a HAI. Strategies for minimising intrahospital transfers should be considered, and further research is needed to identify unnecessary transfers. Their reduction may diminish spread of contagious pathogens in the hospital environment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
EB is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/P000703/1] as part of the ESRC London Interdisciplinary Social Science Doctoral Training Partnership. PE is funded by the Imperial National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), grant number NIHR-BRC-P68711, and acknowledges partial support from EPSRC supporting the EPSRC Centre for Mathematics of Precision Healthcare, grant number EP/N014529/1. KH is funded by Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, grand number NIHR-BRC-P68711. AK and CM reviewed the manuscript as part of routine work. GSC is supported by NIHR Research Professorship. LM is supported by the NIHR Imperial BRC. CC is supported by a personal NIHR Career Development Fellowship (grant number NIHR-2016-090-015). This research was funded by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The research was conducted using National Institute of Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative data resources. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Imperial College London is grateful for support from the NW London NIHR Applied Research Collaboration. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics for this study was granted service evaluation approval through Imperial College London NHS Trust (Ref:347). The datasets were fully anonymised and compliant with Information Commissioner's Office requirements for de-identification. Imperial College Joint Research Office is the dedicated ethics oversight body that has confirmed the study is exempt from Research Ethics Committee review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
De-identified patient data cannot be made publicly available due to information governance restrictions. Access to the datasets used in this paper via a secure environment will be reviewed on request by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust