Abstract
Background Understanding the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck is essential in assessing reduction of talar neck fractures, as well as in planning surgical correction for talar malunions. However, the geometrical parameters that describe this anatomy are sparsely reported in the literature.
Objectives This review aims to identify from the existing literature, those geometrical parameters that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck.
Methods A scoping literature review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The primary searches will be conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases, using a pre-defined search strategy. Any original research study (whether clinical or cadaveric, prospective or retrospective, comparative or noncomparative), looking at the human talus neck geometry or morphology will be included. Studies that do not describe the talar neck geometry, animal studies, review articles, conference abstracts and case reports will be excluded. Geometrical parameters (including techniques to measure these) that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck will be identified. Qualitative analysis will be done by means of appropriate tables and diagrams. If feasible, quantitative analysis to determine pooled estimated of geometrical parameters identified in the review will be conducted by a random-effects meta-analysis model. No formal risk-of-bias assessment has been planned, as this is a scoping literature review.
1. Background
The talus neck connects the talar head with the talar body. Fractures of the talar neck can alter this relationship. Comminution of the medial part of the talar neck is a common occurrence in talar fractures, and can result in a varus deformity if not addressed appropriately (1). Malunion after a talar neck fracture alters the talar head-body relationship and can thereby alter the biomechanics of the subtalar, talonavicular and ankle joints (2). Therefore, accurate assessment of talar neck geometry is vital to avoid malreduction and subsequent talar malunion (3). In established talar malunions, assessment of three-dimensional geometry is vital to plan operative correction.
2. Need for review
The literature on talar neck malunions is limited to description of the varus nature of the deformity and its surgical correction (4–6). The geometrical parameters that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck are sparsely reported. Hence, this review aims to identify from the existing literature, those geometrical parameters that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck.
3. Objectives
Primary Objectives:
To determine the geometrical parameters that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck.
To determine the measurement techniques/methods for these parameters.
Secondary Objective
To determine the normative values of these parameters.
4. PICO framework for the study
Participants: human tali
Intervention: measurement of talar neck geometry by any method
Control: none
Outcomes: types, measurement techniques and values of different parameters that describe the talar neck geometry
5. Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis – Scoping Review extension guidelines (PRISMA-ScR) (7).
Review Protocol
A protocol of the review will be formulated a priori in accordance with the PRISMA-P guidelines. (Appendix I)
Eligibility Criteria
Any original research study (whether clinical or cadaveric, prospective or retrospective, comparative or noncomparative), looking at the human talus neck geometry or morphology will be included. Both English and non-English articles will be included. Studies that do not describe the talar neck geometry, animal studies, review articles, conference abstracts and case reports will be excluded.
Information Sources & Literature search
The primary search will be conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases, using a pre-defined search strategy (Table 1). For the secondary search, a manual search of references from the full-text of all included articles & relevant review articles will be conducted. There will be no restrictions on the language or date of publication.
Study Selection
The titles and abstracts of all articles identified in the initial search will be screened independently by two authors. After initial screening, full-texts of the selected articles will be obtained. Eligibility for inclusion into the review will be assessed according to the pre-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved by mutual agreement. Reasons for exclusion of those studies for which full-text was obtained will be documented. A reference management software (Zotero) will be used to manage references.
Data Collection & Data Items
Data will be extracted on pre-piloted data collection forms by two authors independently, a third author will check the data for accuracy. Baseline data items will include:
First author name, year and journal of publication
Language of publication
Study design: clinical/cadaveric; whether comparative or non-comparative; whether prospective or retrospective
Ethnicity
Number of subjects/bones evaluated
Number of males and females (if reported by the study)
Age distribution (if reported by the study)
Once data extraction is complete, a spreadsheet containing the baseline characteristics, outcome measures and other important information, with respect to all studies included in the review will be created.
Outcome Measures
Since this is a scoping review, it is not feasible to specify all outcome measures at the protocol stage. However, the following measures will be evaluated and additions and/or modifications will be made as needed:
Method(s) of measurement/evaluation
Geometrical parameter(s) evaluated: including, but not limited to talar inclination, declination, torsion, neck length etc.
Values of the geometrical parameter(s) evaluated (means and standard deviation)
Data Analysis and Synthesis
Both qualitative and quantitative analyses will be performed. For qualitative analysis, appropriate tables and data visualization diagrams will be used. Baseline data items as well as all the pre-specified outcome measures will be reported.
Quantitative analysis will be done to determine the pooled estimates of geometrical parameters if ≥ 2 studies describing the values of these parameters are included in the review. Pooled values of these parameters will be estimated by random-effects meta-analysis modelwill be reported as means with 95% confidence intervals. Forest plots will be constructed to visualize the results. Statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated by the I2 test. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis will be performed if high statistical heterogeneity is identified (I2 > 75%). No subgroup analysis or meta-regression has been planned a-priori; however, it may be undertaken depending on the available evidence. Analysis will be performed by the Open Meta Analyst and Stata MP version 14.0 software.
Assessment of Risk of Bias
Since this is a scoping literature review, no formal risk-of-bias assessment has been planned.
Data Availability
This is a protocol for a scoping literature review and as such, contains no study data. The search strategy for the protocol has been included in Table 1.
APPENDIX 1
PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) 2015 checklist: recommended items to address in a systematic review protocol*
From: Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;349(jan02 1):g7647.
