Abstract
Background Understanding the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck is essential in assessing reduction of talar neck fractures, as well as in planning surgical correction for talar malunions. However, the geometrical parameters that describe this anatomy are sparsely reported in the literature.
Objectives This review aims to identify from the existing literature, those geometrical parameters that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck.
Methods A scoping literature review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The primary searches will be conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases, using a pre-defined search strategy. Any original research study (whether clinical or cadaveric, prospective or retrospective, comparative or noncomparative), looking at the human talus neck geometry or morphology will be included. Studies that do not describe the talar neck geometry, animal studies, review articles, conference abstracts and case reports will be excluded. Geometrical parameters (including techniques to measure these) that describe the three-dimensional anatomy of the talar neck will be identified. Qualitative analysis will be done by means of appropriate tables and diagrams. If feasible, quantitative analysis to determine pooled estimated of geometrical parameters identified in the review will be conducted by a random-effects meta-analysis model. No formal risk-of-bias assessment has been planned, as this is a scoping literature review.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding has been obtained for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a protocol for a scoping literature review and therefore IRB clearance is not necessary
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This is a protocol for a scoping literature review and as such, contains no study data. The search strategy for the protocol has been included in Table 1.
