Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS)

View ORCID ProfileGabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro, View ORCID ProfileCarolina Meira Moser, Luciana Terra de Oliveira, Glen Owens Gabbard, View ORCID ProfilePricilla Braga Laskoski, View ORCID ProfileSimone Hauck
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.28.20203331
Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro
1Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
2Psychodynamic Psychiatry Research Lab - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro
  • For correspondence: gabriela.mcmonteiro@gmail.com
Carolina Meira Moser
2Psychodynamic Psychiatry Research Lab - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carolina Meira Moser
Luciana Terra de Oliveira
2Psychodynamic Psychiatry Research Lab - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen Owens Gabbard
3Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pricilla Braga Laskoski
1Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
2Psychodynamic Psychiatry Research Lab - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pricilla Braga Laskoski
Simone Hauck
1Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
2Psychodynamic Psychiatry Research Lab - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simone Hauck
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Work environment can affect the employees, fostering well-being versus emotional burden. The aim of this study was to develop the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS), and evaluate its Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity in a Brazilian sample of medical students and physicians in different settings and phases of the medical career.

Method 2,537 individuals were evaluated by an online questionnaire. The sample was split in half for independent testing of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the best solutions in the second half of the sample. Then, considering a unidimensional model solution, an item response theory (IRT) analysis was conducted. Simple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between ICAS factor scores and internal validators (burnout scores), using again the second half of the sample.

Result Parallel analysis revealed two factors. The first factor encompassed items involving the institution and supervisors. The second factor encompassed items involving peers. We decided to performed the next analysis with a unidimensional construct based solely on institution/supervisor items. A unidimensional model including the remaining seven items from the ICAS instrument revealed an excellent fit with the data. All items loaded significantly on the unidimensional latent trait with factor loadings ranging from 0.583 to 0.869. McDonald’s Omega was 0.89, showing a high internal consistency.

Conclusion This study presents a valid and reliable scale to assess aspects of institutional culture connected to the relationships with superiors/supervisors and to the relation to the institutions themselves.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding/support: None.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (Porto Alegre, Brazil) (protocol 70231617.6.0000.5327).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • No conflicts of interest.

  • Funding/support: None.

  • Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 29, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS)
Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro, Carolina Meira Moser, Luciana Terra de Oliveira, Glen Owens Gabbard, Pricilla Braga Laskoski, Simone Hauck
medRxiv 2020.09.28.20203331; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.28.20203331
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS)
Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro, Carolina Meira Moser, Luciana Terra de Oliveira, Glen Owens Gabbard, Pricilla Braga Laskoski, Simone Hauck
medRxiv 2020.09.28.20203331; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.28.20203331

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (270)
  • Allergy and Immunology (552)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1757)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (658)
  • Epidemiology (10796)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (589)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2946)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1927)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (630)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12515)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (688)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2798)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1463)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (866)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (366)
  • Primary Care Research (337)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2639)
  • Public and Global Health (5363)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1011)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (125)