Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Epidemiological measures for informing the general public during the SARS-CoV-2-outbreak: simulation study about bias by incomplete case-detection

View ORCID ProfileRalph Brinks, Helmut Küchenhoff, Jörg Timm, Tobias Kurth, Annika Hoyer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.23.20200089
Ralph Brinks
1Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
2Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ralph Brinks
  • For correspondence: Ralph.Brinks@stat.uni-muenchen.de
Helmut Küchenhoff
1Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jörg Timm
3Medical Faculty, Institute of Virology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Kurth
4Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Hoyer
1Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, several epidemiological measures, such as cumulative case-counts, incidence rates, effective reproduction numbers and doubling times, have been used to inform the general public and to justify interventions such as lockdown.

During the course of the epidemic, it has been very likely that not all infectious people have been identified, which lead to incomplete case-detection. Apart from asymptomatic infections, possible reasons for incomplete case-detection are availability of test kits and changes in test policies during the course of the epidemic. So far, it has not been examined how biased the reported epidemiological measures are in the presence of incomplete case detection.

In this work, we assess the four frequently used measures with respect to incomplete case-detection: 1) cumulative case-count, 2) incidence rate, 3) effective reproduction number and 4) doubling time. We apply an age-structured SIR model to simulate a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak followed by a lockdown in a hypothetical population. Different scenarios about temporal variations in case-detection are applied to the four measures during outbreak and lockdown. The biases resulting from incomplete case-detection on the four measures are compared. It turns out that the most frequently used epidemiological measure, the cumulative case count is most prone to bias in all of our settings. The effective reproduction number is the least biased measure.

With a view to future reporting about this or other epidemics, we recommend to use of the effective reproduction number for informing the general public and policy makers.

Competing Interest Statement

TK reports outside the submitted work to have received honoraria from Total, Newsenslab, Lilly, and The BMJ.

Funding Statement

None of the authors received any funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All data for this manuscript is publicly available. All sources have been cited properly.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

This work is based on publicly available data. All data sources have been cited properly. The source file as well as the associated technical appendix is uploaded as supplementary material.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 24, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epidemiological measures for informing the general public during the SARS-CoV-2-outbreak: simulation study about bias by incomplete case-detection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Epidemiological measures for informing the general public during the SARS-CoV-2-outbreak: simulation study about bias by incomplete case-detection
Ralph Brinks, Helmut Küchenhoff, Jörg Timm, Tobias Kurth, Annika Hoyer
medRxiv 2020.09.23.20200089; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.23.20200089
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Epidemiological measures for informing the general public during the SARS-CoV-2-outbreak: simulation study about bias by incomplete case-detection
Ralph Brinks, Helmut Küchenhoff, Jörg Timm, Tobias Kurth, Annika Hoyer
medRxiv 2020.09.23.20200089; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.23.20200089

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (243)
  • Allergy and Immunology (525)
  • Anesthesia (125)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1437)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (221)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (293)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (590)
  • Epidemiology (10339)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (534)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2658)
  • Geriatric Medicine (255)
  • Health Economics (499)
  • Health Informatics (1746)
  • Health Policy (791)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (683)
  • Hematology (270)
  • HIV/AIDS (571)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12123)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (650)
  • Medical Education (276)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (291)
  • Neurology (2486)
  • Nursing (145)
  • Nutrition (381)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (498)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (569)
  • Oncology (1338)
  • Ophthalmology (404)
  • Orthopedics (153)
  • Otolaryngology (239)
  • Pain Medicine (172)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (345)
  • Pediatrics (787)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (334)
  • Primary Care Research (297)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2424)
  • Public and Global Health (5035)
  • Radiology and Imaging (903)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (536)
  • Respiratory Medicine (688)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (258)
  • Sports Medicine (246)
  • Surgery (301)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (141)
  • Urology (108)