Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers

Jack H. Buckner, Gerardo Chowell, Michael R. Springborn
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.22.20199174
Jack H. Buckner
1Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hbuckner@ucdavis.edu mspringborn@ucdavis.edu
Gerardo Chowell
2Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Springborn
3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hbuckner@ucdavis.edu mspringborn@ucdavis.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines have been authorized in multiple countries and more are under rapid development. Careful design of a vaccine prioritization strategy across socio-demographic groups is a crucial public policy challenge given that (1) vaccine supply will be constrained for the first several months of the vaccination campaign, (2) there are stark differences in transmission and severity of impacts from SARS-CoV-2 across groups, and (3) SARS-CoV-2 differs markedly from previous pandemic viruses. We assess the optimal allocation of a limited vaccine supply in the U.S. across groups differentiated by age and also essential worker status, which constrains opportunities for social distancing. We model transmission dynamics using a compartmental model parameterized to capture current understanding of the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19, including key sources of group heterogeneity (susceptibility, severity, and contact rates). We investigate three alternative policy objectives (minimizing infections, years of life lost, or deaths) and model a dynamic strategy that evolves with the population epidemiological status. We find that this temporal flexibility contributes substantially to public health goals. Older essential workers are typically targeted first. However, depending on the objective, younger essential workers are prioritized to control spread or seniors to directly control mortality. When the objective is minimizing deaths, relative to an untargeted approach, prioritization averts deaths on a range between 20,000 (when non-pharmaceutical interventions are strong) and 300,000 (when these interventions are weak). We illustrate how optimal prioritization is sensitive to several factors, most notably vaccine effectiveness and supply, rate of transmission, and the magnitude of initial infections.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This was modeling study an thus clinical trial registration was not applicable.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by an Emergency COVID-19 Seed Award from the California Breast Cancer Research Program of the University of California (UC), Grant Number R00RG2419. GC is partially support by NSF grants #2026797, #2034003, and NIH R01 GM 130900. JB is partailly supported by NSF grant #1650042. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 1650042. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No human or animal subjects were involved in this study

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used in the article are publicly available from the relevant citation included in the text. Code for the analysis may be obtained from the authors upon request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 17, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers
Jack H. Buckner, Gerardo Chowell, Michael R. Springborn
medRxiv 2020.09.22.20199174; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.22.20199174
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers
Jack H. Buckner, Gerardo Chowell, Michael R. Springborn
medRxiv 2020.09.22.20199174; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.22.20199174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (144)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4855)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (676)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (628)
  • Health Policy (320)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (203)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5339)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (330)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (686)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (208)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (780)
  • Public and Global Health (1816)
  • Radiology and Imaging (324)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)