Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Environmental impact of Personal Protective Equipment supplied to health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Chantelle Rizan, Malcolm Reed, Mahmood F Bhutta
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198911
Chantelle Rizan
1Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
2Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
3Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, Oxford, UK
4Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
Roles: ENT Research Fellow, Honorary Clinical Teaching Fellow, Sustainable Surgery Fellow, Surgical Research Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chantelle.rizan@nhs.net
Malcolm Reed
2Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
Roles: Dean and Professor of Surgical Oncology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahmood F Bhutta
1Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
2Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
5BMA Medical Fair and Ethical Trade Group, British Medical Association, London, UK
Roles: Consultant and Academic Lead in ENT Surgery, Honorary Clinical Professor, Founder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has been central to controlling spread of SARS-CoV2. Here we quantify the environmental impact of PPE supplied to the health and social care system in England, and model strategies for its mitigation.

Methods Life cycle assessment was used to determine environmental impacts of PPE supplied to health and social care in England during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The base scenario assumed all products were single-use and disposed of via clinical waste. Scenario modelling was used to determine the effect of mitigation strategies; 1) eliminating international travel during supply, 2) eliminating glove use 3) reusing gowns and face shields, 4) maximal recycling.

Results The carbon footprint of PPE supplied during the study period totalled 106,478 tonnes CO2e, with greatest contributions from gloves, aprons, face shields, and Type IIR surgical masks. The estimated damage to human health was 239 DALYs (disability adjusted life years), impact on ecosystems was 0.47 species.year (loss of local species per year), and impact on resource depletion costed at US $ 12.7 million.

Scenario modelling indicated UK manufacture would have reduced the carbon footprint by 12%, eliminating gloves by 45%, reusing gowns and gloves by 10%, and maximal recycling by 35%. A combination of strategies would have reduced carbon footprint by 75% compared with the base scenario, and saved an estimated 183 DALYS, 0.34 species.year, and US $ 7.4 million due to resource depletion.

Conclusions The environmental impact of PPE is large and could be reduced through domestic manufacture, rationalising glove use, using reusables where possible, and optimising waste management.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

N/A

Funding Statement

None to declare

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not required- this study did not involve any patients or healthcare staff.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None to declare

  • Funding None to declare

  • Ethical approval Not required- this study did not involve any patients or healthcare staff.

  • Guarantor Chantelle Rizan is the manuscript guarantor.

  • Contribution statement All authors fulfilled the authorship criteria as follows:

    Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND

    Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND

    Final approval of the version to be published; AND

    Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

    CR led on LCA study design and analysis, and co-authored the first draft of the manuscript. MB initiated the article, sourced sample PPE materials, and co-authored the first draft of the manuscript. MR provided critical input to structure and content. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Data Availability

Supporting data is available in supplementary files

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 10, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Environmental impact of Personal Protective Equipment supplied to health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Environmental impact of Personal Protective Equipment supplied to health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic
Chantelle Rizan, Malcolm Reed, Mahmood F Bhutta
medRxiv 2020.09.21.20198911; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198911
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Environmental impact of Personal Protective Equipment supplied to health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic
Chantelle Rizan, Malcolm Reed, Mahmood F Bhutta
medRxiv 2020.09.21.20198911; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198911

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (217)
  • Allergy and Immunology (496)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1112)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (197)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (275)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (508)
  • Epidemiology (9807)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (482)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2335)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (464)
  • Health Informatics (1569)
  • Health Policy (738)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (609)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (508)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11674)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2162)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (340)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (520)
  • Oncology (1187)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (221)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (314)
  • Pediatrics (700)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (303)
  • Primary Care Research (268)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2196)
  • Public and Global Health (4694)
  • Radiology and Imaging (786)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (459)
  • Respiratory Medicine (625)
  • Rheumatology (276)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (227)
  • Sports Medicine (214)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)