Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xingwei Jin, Boke Liu, Yunqi Xiong, Weichao Tu, Yuan Shao, View ORCID ProfileLin Zhang, Dawei Wang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198705
Xingwei Jin
1Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boke Liu
1Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunqi Xiong
2Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai TCM College Affiliated Shu Guang Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weichao Tu
1Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuan Shao
1Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Zhang
3School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
4Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3100, Australia
5The University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3100, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lin Zhang
  • For correspondence: wdwrjhn@163.com tony1982110@gmail.com
Dawei Wang
1Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wdwrjhn@163.com tony1982110@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives To investigate the outcomes of internal ureteral stent versus ureteroscopy (URS) treatments for pregnant women with urolithiasis.

Design This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that investigated the outcomes of internal ureteral stent and ureteroscopy for pregnancy with urolithiasis. This systematic review have been registered on the PROSPERO website (www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd, registration number: CRD42020195607).

Data Sources Relevant studies published from January 1980 to April 2020 were identified through a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.

Data extraction and synthesis All pregnant women in their all pregnancy stages who were underwent double-J (D-J) stent insertion only or URS operation for lithotripsy/stone extraction/exploration were considered. The number of related participants in study more than 10 were included. Fertility outcome and complications of intervention were extracted as main outcomes, while other data such as operation success rate, stone free rate (SFR), patient characteristics, anaesthetic method, ureteral stone characteristics, detail of interventions were obtained as well. Complications were stratified according to Clavien-Dindo criteria. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Study-specific prevalence rates were pooled using a random-effects model. We applied the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.

Results A total of 25 studies were identified with 131 cases undergoing serial stenting and 789 cases undergoing URS operation. The age range was from 16 to 41, and urolithiasis occurred in the second trimester most. Ultrasound was the most commonly used diagnostic method. The most common site of calculi was distal ureter. The average stone size was between 6-17mm. There were 6 studies investigating D-J stent insertion only, while 23 studies involving URS operation. The most commonly used anesthesia for internal ureteral stent therapy was local anesthesia, and for URS treatments, general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were widely used. The pooled operation success rate was 97% for D-J stent insertion, and 99% for URS. Serial D-J stenting was an effective methods for treating ureter obstruction and only a few patients passed stone spontaneously. Different common lithotripters were used in URS operations and the pooled SFR was about 91%. For internal ureteral stent therapy; the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99%, but the pooled incidence of complications was about 45%. For the URS treatment group, the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99% as well, and the pooled incidence of complications was about 1%. However, the pooled premature and abortion incidence rate of two group were the same as less than 1%, and the same as this in serious complication incidence rate.

Conclusions Both ureteroscopy operation and internal ureteral stent were usually used for handing pregnancy with urolithiasis. Two treatments had less side effective on fertility outcome, but internal ureteral stent may cause more complications. Evidence suggests that URS therapy may have a greater advantage for pregnancy with urolithiasis when the conditions permit. As it is proved safe and effective, internal ureteral stent could be considered at emergency condition or preoperative preparations was lack.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the General Programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81970658) and the Youth Program of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital North (2020ZY06).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval is not required for this study because it is a systematic review and meta-analysis by using the published available data.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Transparency declaration The corresponding authors affirm that this manuscript is an accurate account of the study proposed with no important aspects omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned and registered will be explained upon the completion of the proposed study.

  • Ethical approval Ethics approval is not required for this study because it is a systematic review and meta-analysis by using the published available data.

  • Details of funding This study was supported by the General Programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81970658) and the Youth Program of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital North (2020ZY06).

  • Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

  • Statement of independence of researchers form funders Not applicable.

  • Patient involvement No patients were involved in the design or analysis of this study.

  • Data sharing statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 23, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xingwei Jin, Boke Liu, Yunqi Xiong, Weichao Tu, Yuan Shao, Lin Zhang, Dawei Wang
medRxiv 2020.09.21.20198705; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198705
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xingwei Jin, Boke Liu, Yunqi Xiong, Weichao Tu, Yuan Shao, Lin Zhang, Dawei Wang
medRxiv 2020.09.21.20198705; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198705

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Urology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9785)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2319)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11657)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2149)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4674)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)