Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition

Susan Thurstans, Charles Opondo, Andrew Seal, Jonathan C Wells, Tanya Khara, Carmel Dolan, André Briend, Mark Myatt, Michel Garenne, Rebecca Sear, Marko Kerac
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.19.20196535
Susan Thurstans
1Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: susan.fuller@lshtm.ac.uk
Charles Opondo
2Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Seal
3UCL Institute for Global Health. London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan C Wells
3UCL Institute for Global Health. London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanya Khara
4Emergency Nutrition Network, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmel Dolan
4Emergency Nutrition Network, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
André Briend
5School of Medicine, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Myatt
6Brixton Health, Llwyngwril, Gwynedd, Wales. United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Garenne
7Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Unité Mixte Internationale (UMI) Résiliences, Paris, France, Institut Pasteur, Epidémiologie des Maladies Emergentes, Paris, France, Senior Fellow, FERDI, Université d’Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France, MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Sear
1Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marko Kerac
1Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
8Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Excess male morbidity and mortality is well recognised in neonatal medicine and infant health. In contrast, within global nutrition, it is commonly assumed that girls are more at-risk of experiencing undernutrition. We aimed to explore evidence for any male/female differences in child undernutrition using anthropometric case definitions and the reasons for differences observed.

Methods We searched: Medline, Embase, Global health, Popline and Cochrane databases with no time limits applied. Eligible studies focused on children aged 0-59 months affected by undernutrition where sex was reported. In the meta-analysis, undernutrition-specific estimates were examined separately for wasting, stunting and underweight using a random effects model.

Results 76 studies were identified: 46/76 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In 20 which examined wasting, boys had higher odds of being wasted than girls (pooled OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.40). 39 examined stunting: boys had higher odds of stunting than girls (pooled OR 1.31 95% CI 1.24-1.39). 25 explored underweight: boys had higher odds of being underweight than girls (pooled OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32). There was some limited evidence that the female advantage indicating lower risk of stunting and underweight was weaker in South Asia than other parts of the world.

44/76 (58%) studies discussed possible reasons for boy/girl differences; 11/76 (14%) cited studies with similar findings with no further discussion; 21/76 (28%) had no sex difference discussion. 6/44 studies (14%) postulated biological causes, 21/44 (48%) social causes and 17/44 (38%) to a combination.

Conclusion Our review indicates that undernutrition in children under 5 is more likely to affect boys than girls, though the magnitude of these differences varies and is more pronounced in some contexts than others. Future research should further explore reasons for these differences and implications for nutrition policy and practice.

What is already known?

  • Undernutrition (wasting, stunting, and underweight) is a public health problem affecting millions of children aged under 5 years globally.

  • Although higher neonatal and infant morbidity/mortality for boys is well described, little attention has been given to sex differences in the field of undernutrition due to an assumption that girls are very often disadvantaged over boys.

What are the new findings?

  • In most settings studied, undernutrition is more common among boys than girls, though the extent of these differences varies and is reversed in a few contexts.

  • Both biological and social mechanisms have been proposed to be responsible for the observed differences as well as a combination of the two.

What do the new findings imply?

  • Greater awareness of actual sex differences is needed within the field of nutrition. While sex-specific data is routinely analysed and reported in nutrition surveys it should be used in nutrition programming to better identify and understand what differences exist. Analysis should assess if the sex balance in programme admissions is reflective of the population undernutrition burden.

  • Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms that lead to sex and gender differences in undernutrition and their implications. Better epidemiological understanding is a priority, as is work to explore their consequent effects on morbidity and mortality.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This paper is made possible by funding from Irish Aid (grant number HQPU/2020/ENN). The ideas, opinions and comments therein are entirely the responsibility of its author(s) and do not necessarily represent or reflect Irish Aid policy. This paper is also made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of ENN and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data reported in this paper are publicly available

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition
Susan Thurstans, Charles Opondo, Andrew Seal, Jonathan C Wells, Tanya Khara, Carmel Dolan, André Briend, Mark Myatt, Michel Garenne, Rebecca Sear, Marko Kerac
medRxiv 2020.09.19.20196535; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.19.20196535
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition
Susan Thurstans, Charles Opondo, Andrew Seal, Jonathan C Wells, Tanya Khara, Carmel Dolan, André Briend, Mark Myatt, Michel Garenne, Rebecca Sear, Marko Kerac
medRxiv 2020.09.19.20196535; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.19.20196535

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Nutrition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (161)
  • Allergy and Immunology (416)
  • Anesthesia (91)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (860)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (250)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (394)
  • Epidemiology (8562)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (384)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1753)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (373)
  • Health Informatics (1244)
  • Health Policy (621)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (468)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (374)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10303)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (212)
  • Neurology (1678)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (251)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (326)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (451)
  • Oncology (929)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (102)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (114)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (253)
  • Pediatrics (536)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (253)
  • Primary Care Research (208)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1770)
  • Public and Global Health (3841)
  • Radiology and Imaging (624)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (320)
  • Respiratory Medicine (520)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (168)
  • Sports Medicine (158)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)