Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into account

Monika Malecki, Jessica Luesebrink, Andreas Wendel, Frauke Mattner
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.18.20185744

Article usage

Article usage: September 2020 to December 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 2020230085
Oct 2020121042
Nov 202072036
Dec 202038024
Jan 202145012
Feb 202155013
Mar 2021781312
Apr 20216308
May 202154118
Jun 202146010
Jul 202135314
Aug 202128719
Sep 202133010
Oct 202123236
Nov 202122232
Dec 20212316
Jan 20221375
Feb 20221722
Mar 20221653
Apr 20221536
May 20221428
Jun 20221644
Jul 20221234
Aug 20221548
Sep 202227316
Oct 20221825
Nov 20221733
Dec 20221768
Jan 202319310
Feb 20231124
Mar 2023914
Apr 202320213
May 20231339
Jun 2023874
Jul 2023405
Aug 202317126
Sep 20231142
Oct 2023907
Nov 20231243
Dec 2023401
Back to top
Posted September 23, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into account
Monika Malecki, Jessica Luesebrink, Andreas Wendel, Frauke Mattner
medRxiv 2020.09.18.20185744; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.18.20185744
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area