Abstract
Purpose This systematic review evaluates the current intervention strategies for cystinuria and assesses their quality and efficacy in order to determine the need to identify new and improved strategies for treatment.
Materials and Methods A literature search for interventions in cystinuria was conducted on key electronic databases for studies published between 1996 and 2019. Quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed for study design, patient characteristics and outcomes of interventions, including urinary cystine levels, stone-free rate and stone recurrence rate. A qualitative and critical analysis was performed.
Results Common treatment strategies for cystinuria include hydration and diuresis, alkali therapy and thiol-based therapeutics. Conservative therapies such as adequate hydration and urinary alkalization effectively increased urinary pH, decreased urinary cystine levels and the formation of cystine stones. Second line agents reported included thiols such as Tiopronin, D-penicillamine and captopril. Non-invasive surgical procedures were found to reduce operative trauma and preserved renal function. Combined treatment approaches with hydration and thiols after surgical procedures were associated with less stones and reduced stone recurrence rates. Patient compliance to interventions was often poor and contributed to recurrent cystine stones.
Conclusions Despite existing pharmacological intervention strategies, cystinuria patients frequently require surgical procedures. A more detailed understanding of the mechanisms of pathogenesis of cystinuria as well as an evaluation of patients on an individual basis may be beneficial in reducing the severity of cystinuria, by reducing stone recurrence and associated renal complications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia Kiriwina investment company, Australia
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Newcastle ethics committee
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in this systematic review is available online through relevant cited references
