Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence

View ORCID ProfileGenghmun Eng
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.16.20196063
Genghmun Eng
PhD Physics 1978, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Genghmun Eng
  • For correspondence: geng001@socal.rr.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Early CoVID-19 growth obeys: Embedded Image, with Ko = [(ln 2)/(tdbl)], where tdbl is the pandemic growth doubling time. Given Embedded Image, the daily number of new CoVID-19 cases is Embedded Image. Implementing society-wide Social Distancing increases the tdbl doubling time, and a linear function of time for tdbl was used in our Initial Model: Embedded Image to describe these changes, where the [t]-axis is time-shifted from the Embedded Image–axis back to the pandemic start, and Go ≡ [KA/ γo]. While this No[t] successfully modeled the USA CoVID-19 progress from 3/2020 to 6/2020, this equation could not easily model some quickly decreasing ρ[t] cases (“fast pandemic shutoff “), indicating that a second process was involved. This situation was most evident in the initial CoVID-19 data from China, South Korea, and Italy. Modifying Zo[t] to allow exponential cutoffs: Embedded Image resulted in an Enhanced Initial Model (EIM) that significantly improved data fits for these cases.

After 6/2020, many regions of the USA “opened up”, loosening their Social Distancing requirements, which led to a sudden USA CoVID-19 Resurgence. Extrapolating the USA No[t] 3/2020-6/2020 results to 9/2020 as an Initial Model Baseline (IMB), and subtracting this IMB from the newer USA data gives a Resurgence Only function, which is analyzed here. This USA CoVID-19 Resurgence function differs significantly from the No[t] IMB functional form, but it was well-modeled by the NA[t] fast pandemic shutoff function. These results indicate that: (a) the gradual increase in tdbl doubling time from society-wide shut-downs is likely due to eliminating of a large number of population gathering points that could have enabled CoVID-19 spread; and (b) having a non-zero δ o fast pandemic shutoff is likely due to more people wearing masks more often [with 12 Figures].

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No External Funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No Human Subjects involved, as this is a Data Analysis Project. No IRB approvals needed.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used is in the Public Domain or was on the CoVID-19 website maintained by bing.com.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 21, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence
Genghmun Eng
medRxiv 2020.09.16.20196063; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.16.20196063
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence
Genghmun Eng
medRxiv 2020.09.16.20196063; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.16.20196063

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (166)
  • Anesthesia (49)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (188)
  • Epidemiology (5206)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (194)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (747)
  • Geriatric Medicine (76)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (691)
  • Health Policy (350)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (221)
  • Hematology (98)
  • HIV/AIDS (161)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5798)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (355)
  • Medical Education (101)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (754)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (230)
  • Oncology (473)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (93)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (138)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (851)
  • Public and Global Health (1987)
  • Radiology and Imaging (342)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (155)
  • Respiratory Medicine (282)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (74)
  • Surgery (107)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)