Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Testing, Testing: What SARS-CoV-2 testing services do adults in the United States actually want?

Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela Parcesepe, View ORCID ProfileLevi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, View ORCID ProfileMcKaylee Robertson, Andrew R Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.15.20195180
Rebecca Zimba
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rebecca.zimba@sph.cuny.edu
Sarah Kulkarni
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.kulkarni@sph.cuny.edu
Amanda Berry
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amanda.berry@sph.cuny.edu
William You
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: william.you@sph.cuny.edu
Chloe Mirzayi
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chloe.mirzayi@sph.cuny.edu
Drew Westmoreland
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drew.westmoreland@sph.cuny.edu
Angela Parcesepe
2 Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: parcesep@live.unc.edu
Levi Waldron
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Levi Waldron
  • For correspondence: levi.waldron@sph.cuny.edu
Madhura Rane
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: madhura.rane@sph.cuny.edu
Shivani Kochhar
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shivani.kochhar@sph.cuny.edu
McKaylee Robertson
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for McKaylee Robertson
  • For correspondence: mckaylee.robertson@sph.cuny.edu
Andrew R Maroko
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anrew.maroko@sph.cuny.edu
Christian Grov
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christian.grov@sph.cuny.edu
Denis Nash
1 Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: denis.nash@gmail.com
3 -
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance: Ascertaining preferences for SARS-CoV-2 testing and incorporating findings into the design and implementation of strategies for delivering testing services may enhance testing uptake and engagement, a prerequisite to reducing onward transmission. Objective: To determine important drivers of decisions to obtain a SARS-CoV-2 test in the context of increasing community transmission. Design: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess the relative importance of type of SARS-CoV-2 test, specimen type, testing venue, and results turnaround time. Uptake of an optimized testing scenario was simulated relative to the current typical testing scenario of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) via nasopharyngeal (NP) swab in a provider office or urgent care clinic with results in >5 days. Setting:​ Online survey, embedded in an existing cohort study, conducted during July 30 - September 8, 2020. Participants: ​Participants (n=4,793) were enrolled in the CHASING COVID Cohort Study, a national longitudinal cohort of adults >18 years residing in the 50 US states, Washington, DC, Puerto Rico, or Guam. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Relative importance of SARS-CoV-2 testing method attributes, utilities of specific attribute levels, and probability of choosing a testing scenario based on preferences estimated from the DCE, the current typical testing option, or choosing not to test. Results: ​Turnaround time for test results had the highest relative importance (30.4%), followed by test type (28.3%), specimen type (26.2%), and venue (15.0%). Participants preferred fast results on both past and current infection and using a noninvasive specimen, preferably collected at home. Simulations suggested that providing immediate or same day test results, providing both PCR and serology, or collecting oral specimens would substantially increase testing uptake over the current typical testing option. Simulated uptake of a hypothetical testing scenario of PCR and serology via a saliva sample at a pharmacy with same day results was 97.7%, compared to 0.6% for the current typical testing scenario, with 1.8% opting for no test. Conclusions and Relevance: ​Testing strategies that offer both PCR and serology with non-invasive methods and rapid turnaround time would likely have the most uptake and engagement among residents in communities with increasing community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.28.20080630v1

Funding Statement

Funding for this project is provided by the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (cunyisph.org), the COVID-19 Grant Program of the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, and the National Institute Of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UH3AI133675.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Requests to access deidentified study data can be made by contacting the investigators directly

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Testing, Testing: What SARS-CoV-2 testing services do adults in the United States actually want?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Testing, Testing: What SARS-CoV-2 testing services do adults in the United States actually want?
Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela Parcesepe, Levi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, McKaylee Robertson, Andrew R Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
medRxiv 2020.09.15.20195180; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.15.20195180
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Testing, Testing: What SARS-CoV-2 testing services do adults in the United States actually want?
Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela Parcesepe, Levi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, McKaylee Robertson, Andrew R Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
medRxiv 2020.09.15.20195180; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.15.20195180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (47)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (49)
  • Emergency Medicine (145)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4874)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (678)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (633)
  • Health Policy (322)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (208)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5357)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (332)
  • Medical Education (94)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (690)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (127)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (209)
  • Oncology (443)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (90)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (17)
  • Pathology (130)
  • Pediatrics (196)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (781)
  • Public and Global Health (1823)
  • Radiology and Imaging (325)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (102)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)