ABSTRACT
Objectives To investigate rates of adherence to the UK’s test, trace and isolate system over time.
Design Time series of cross-sectional online surveys.
Setting Data were collected between 2 March and 5 August 2020.
Participants 42,127 responses from 31,787 people living in the UK, aged 16 years or over, are presented (21 survey waves, n≈2,000 per wave).
Main outcome measures Identification of the key symptoms of COVID-19 (cough, high temperature / fever, and loss of sense of smell or taste), self-reported adherence to self-isolation if symptomatic, requesting an antigen test if symptomatic, intention to share details of close contacts, self-reported adherence to quarantine if alerted that you had been in contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case.
Results Only 48.9% of participants (95% CI 48.2% to 49.7%) identified key symptoms of COVID-19. Self-reported adherence to test, trace and isolate behaviours was low (self-isolation 18.2%, 95% CI 16.4% to 19.9%; requesting an antigen test 11.9%, 95% CI 10.1% to 13.8%; intention to share details of close contacts 76.1%, 95% CI 75.4% to 76.8%; quarantining 10.9%, 95% CI 7.8% to 13.9%) and largely stable over time. By contrast, intention to adhere to protective measures was much higher. Non-adherence was associated with: men, younger age groups, having a dependent child in the household, lower socioeconomic grade, greater hardship during the pandemic, and working in a key sector.
Conclusions Practical support and financial reimbursement is likely to improve adherence. Targeting messaging and policies to men, younger age groups, and key workers may also be necessary.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
Test, trace and isolate systems are one of the cornerstones of COVID-19 recovery strategy.
The success of the test, trace and isolation system depends on adherence to isolating if symptomatic, getting a test if symptomatic, passing on details of close contacts if infection is confirmed, and quarantining of contacts.
Rates of adherence to test, trace and isolate behaviours in the UK need to be systematically investigated.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
Self-reported adherence to test, trace and isolate behaviours is low; intention to carry out these behaviours is much higher.
Identification of COVID-19 symptoms is also low.
Practical support and financial reimbursement are likely to improve adherence to test, trace and isolate behaviours.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors had financial support from NIHR for the submitted work; RA is an employee of Public Health England; HWWP receives additional salary support from Public Health England grant funding from NHS England and has received consultancy fees from Babylon Health; NTF is part funded by a grant from the UK Ministry of Defence, is a trustee of a charity supporting the wellbeing UK Service personnel, veterans and their families, and is a specialist member of IGARD (the independent group advising NHS Digital on the release of patient data); GJR has had several consultancy contracts with HM Government on topics relating to disaster response and is a member of several advisory committees for HM Government in this area. All authors are regular participants in the UK Governments Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies or its subgroups. We declare no other financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
LS, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, Kings College London and the University of East Anglia. HP receives funding from Public Health England. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care. The Department of Health and Social care funded data collection.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work was conducted as part of service evaluation of the marketing and communications run by the Department of Health and Social Care, and so did not require ethical approval. We sought and received permission to treat this as a service evaluation by James Patterson (King's College London, Senior Research Ethics Officer).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No additional data are available from the authors.
