Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: People’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

View ORCID ProfileJMJ Isautier, View ORCID ProfileT Copp, View ORCID ProfileJ Ayre, View ORCID ProfileE Cvejic, G Meyerowitz-Katz, View ORCID ProfileC Batcup, View ORCID ProfileC Bonner, View ORCID ProfileRH Dodd, View ORCID ProfileB Nickel, K Pickles, View ORCID ProfileS Cornell, View ORCID ProfileT Dakin, K McCaffery
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.20192336
JMJ Isautier
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for JMJ Isautier
  • For correspondence: jennifer.isautier@sydney.edu.au
T Copp
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T Copp
J Ayre
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J Ayre
E Cvejic
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E Cvejic
G Meyerowitz-Katz
2Western Sydney Diabetes, Western Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Batcup
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C Batcup
C Bonner
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C Bonner
RH Dodd
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for RH Dodd
B Nickel
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B Nickel
K Pickles
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Cornell
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S Cornell
T Dakin
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T Dakin
K McCaffery
1The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales AUSTRALIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To determine how participants perceived telehealth consults in comparison to traditional in-person visits, and to investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful beyond the pandemic.

Design A national cross-sectional community survey.

Participants Australian adults aged 18 years and over (n=1369).

Main outcome measures Telehealth experiences.

Results Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (62%) rated their telehealth experience as “just as good” or “better” than a traditional in-person medical appointment. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic is over (M=3.67 out of 5, SD=1.1). Being male (p=0.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (p=0.037), or lower patient activation (individuals’ willingness to take on the role of managing their health/healthcare) (p=0.037) were associated with a poorer telehealth experience. Six overarching themes were identified from free-text responses of why telehealth experience was poorer than a traditional in-person medical appointment: communication is not as effective; limitations with technology; issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology; reduced confidence in doctor; additional burden for complex care; and inability to be physically examined.

Conclusions Telehealth appointments were reported to be comparable to traditional in-person medical appointments by most of our sample. Telehealth should continue to be offered as a mode of healthcare delivery while the pandemic continues and may be worthwhile beyond the pandemic.

The known
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase in telehealth services.

The new
  • The majority of telehealth users (62%) perceived their experience to be just as good or better than traditional in-person medical care; and that telehealth would be at least somewhat useful beyond the pandemic.

  • Having a history of both depression and anxiety was associated with a poorer telehealth experience and in-person visits were frequently preferred over telehealth visits for mental health appointments.

The implication
  • Telehealth should continue to be offered while the COVID-19 pandemic continues and may be worthwhile beyond the pandemic, however, telehealth may be less effective for mental health services.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/212).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is available upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: People’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: People’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
JMJ Isautier, T Copp, J Ayre, E Cvejic, G Meyerowitz-Katz, C Batcup, C Bonner, RH Dodd, B Nickel, K Pickles, S Cornell, T Dakin, K McCaffery
medRxiv 2020.09.10.20192336; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.20192336
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: People’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
JMJ Isautier, T Copp, J Ayre, E Cvejic, G Meyerowitz-Katz, C Batcup, C Bonner, RH Dodd, B Nickel, K Pickles, S Cornell, T Dakin, K McCaffery
medRxiv 2020.09.10.20192336; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.20192336

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1226)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (528)
  • Epidemiology (9999)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (497)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2442)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1634)
  • Health Policy (750)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (633)
  • Hematology (247)
  • HIV/AIDS (530)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11855)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (625)
  • Medical Education (251)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2272)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (349)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (451)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1244)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (729)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (281)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4823)
  • Radiology and Imaging (833)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (488)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (224)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (124)
  • Urology (99)