Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Prison population reductions and COVID-19: A latent profile analysis synthesizing recent evidence from the Texas state prison system

View ORCID ProfileNoel Vest, Oshea Johnson, Kathryn Nowotny, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190884
Noel Vest
1Department of Sociology, University of Miami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Noel Vest
  • For correspondence: noelvest@stanford.edu
Oshea Johnson
1Department of Sociology, University of Miami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Nowotny
2Department of Sociology, University of Miami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
3Department of Social Medicine, Center for Health Equity Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Importance People in prison are particularly vulnerable to infectious disease due to close living conditions and the lack of protective equipment. Public health professionals and prison administrators seek information to guide best practices regarding prison population to capacity rates for the COVID-19 outbreak.

Objective Using latent profile analysis, we sought to characterize Texas prisons on levels of COVID-19 cases and deaths among incarcerated residents, and COVID-19 cases among prison staff.

Design This observational study was a secondary data analysis of publicly available data from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TBDJ). Data were downloaded and analyzed on July 24, 2020. This project was completed in collaboration with the COVID Prison Project.

Setting One-hundred and three prisons in the state of Texas.

Participants The unit of analysis is the individual prison units that comprise the TDCJ.

Exposures None

Main Outcomes and Measures Latent profiles on levels of incarcerated resident COVID-19 cases, staff COVID-19 cases, and incarcerated resident COVID-19 deaths.

Results We identified relevant profiles from the data: a low outbreak profile, a high outbreak profile, and a high death profile. Additionally, current prison population and level of employee staffing predicted membership in the high outbreak and high death profiles when compared to the low outbreak profile.

Conclusions and Relevance Housing persons at 85% of prison capacity may minimize the risk of infection and death related to COVID-19. Implementing this 85% standard as an absolute minimum should be prioritized at prisons across the US.

Question Is there a population to capacity ratio for prisons to successfully reduce the number of COVID-19 infections and deaths among its incarcerated populations?

Findings The prisons that were most effective in reducing prison outbreaks and deaths operated at 85% of their current capacity.

Meaning Prisons should operate at 85% of capacity or less to successfully minimize the harmful effects of COVID-19 on incarcerated populations.

INTRODUCTION

Due to their close living conditions and limited opportunity for physical distancing, people in prisons are extremely vulnerable to COVID-19 infection.1 As a result, prisons have become hotspots for recent COVID-19 outbreaks.2 There has been a 21.4 percent increase in COVID-19 cases in prisons from July 13, 2020, to July 26, 2020, such that persons incarcerated are infected at nearly 4 times the rate of the general public, and prison staff are infected at two and half times the rate of the general public3. Despite the recent surge, very little is known regarding the characteristics of prisons with high outbreaks or high deaths. A better understanding would provide prison administrators, researchers, and health care professionals with valuable information for public health policy and planning as it relates to COVID-19 infections in state prisons.

We use latent profile analysis (LPA) to provide data-driven patterns of the COVID-19 outbreak in Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), the largest state prison system. TDCJ has the highest level of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the nation and reports active cases at 97% of the prison facilities.3 TDCJ provides a unique opportunity to examine data patterns because all residents and staff have been tested for COVID-19.4

METHOD

We used publicly available data from TDCJ and COVID Prison Project4 collected up to July 24, 2020. The primary outcome was a latent profile of Texas prisons based on their levels of incarcerated resident COVID-19 cases, incarcerated resident COVID-19 deaths, and staff COVID-19 cases. Secondary outcomes included prison level predictors of latent profile membership (population, capacity, age of the prison, and staff levels). We excluded three prison facilities because they were identified as holding facilities for individuals that had recently violated parole. Our final sample included 103 Texas prison facilities.

Data analysis

We analyzed the data using MPlus version 8.3.5 First, LPA models were evaluated to determine the profile structure. We used LPA to group for patterns in the data based on three continuous observed indicators: 1) reported COVID-19 cases among incarcerated individuals, 2) reported COVID-19 deaths among incarcerated individuals, and 3) reported COVID-19 cases among prison staff (Figure 1). We planned to include staff deaths, but the relatively low level of staff deaths created convergence problems.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Latent profile statistical model.

We estimated 1–5 latent profile solutions. Model selection was based on standard fit statistics (BIC, entropy scores, and LRT scores).6,7 Once the latent profiles were identified, we examined the association between covariates and profiles using a model-based multinomial logistic regression.8 The three-step method was preferred because it produces more stable and less biased estimates with small sample sizes (e.g., 100–200).9 Each of the predictor covariates were entered into the model separately. For all of our logistic models, we used profile 1 as the referent profile. We had no missing data.

Ethics

Because the data was publicly available, it did not require approval from the University Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

There were 11,799 confirmed COVID-19 cases within TDCJ among incarcerated residents, 104 presumed COVID-19 deaths among incarcerated residents, 2,497 confirmed cases among prison staff, and 12 deaths among prison staff. The entire resident population of the prisons included in the analyses was 130,610 and the entire staff population was 37,201.

We identified the three-profile solution as the most parsimonious (BIC 2595.08, entropy.99, non-significant LMR). Profile 1 (88 out of 103 prisons – dashed black line in Figure 2), “low outbreak” facilities, was characterized by prisons with a low number of incarcerated resident cases, a low number of incarcerated resident deaths, and a low number of prison staff cases. Profile 2 (5 out of 105 prisons – black line in Figure 2), “high death” facilities, was characterized by prisons with a moderate number of incarcerated resident cases, a very high level of incarcerated resident deaths, and a high level of prison staff cases. Profile 3 (10 out of 103 prisons – grey line in Figure 2), “high outbreak” facilities, was characterized by prisons with a very high level of incarcerated resident cases, a moderate level of incarcerated resident deaths, and a high level of staff cases. In Supplement 1, we offer a listing of the prisons in each profile.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Standardized and raw score outcomes for each latent profile.

The effects of covariates on profile membership were analyzed for differences from profile 1 (low outbreak; Table 1). Current prison population significantly predicted membership in the high outbreak and high death profiles when compared to the low outbreak profile. Low outbreak prisons were at 85% of capacity, while the high death and high outbreak profiles were at 94% and 102% capacity, respectively. Current number of employees significantly predicted membership in the high outbreak and high death profiles compared to the low outbreak profile. We found no statistical differences among profiles in age of operation for a prison.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Prison characteristic and risk covariates.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to examine COVID-19 cases in a statewide prison system. We found that the majority of prisons in Texas were characterized by low levels of COVID-19 outbreaks among staff and incarcerated residents. Additionally, the level of overcrowding in the low outbreak prisons was moderate with a current population to capacity ratio of 85%. This suggests that the benchmark for prisons to effectively reduce COVID-19 infections should be set to under 85% of capacity. Importantly, this 85% standard should be implemented as an absolute minimum rate.

More than half of the total number of COVID-19 deaths in Texas were attributed to five prisons (65 out of 103 deaths) and nearly half of the total cases of COVID-19 were attributed to 10 prisons (5,000 out of 11,799 people). This suggests that there are COVID-19 prison hotspots, which may be connected to the overcrowding issue, understaffing, or other common characteristics that facilities share, such as resident demographics. For example, two prisons in the “high death” profile are geriatric facilities. In this inherently overcrowded environment, we suggest prisons should continue to drastically reduce their prison populations through decarceration efforts as a best practice to mitigate harms.10 This is especially true for those over 55 years of age11 since there is a growing need for gerontological knowledge and skills in prisons to help mitigate the growing infection and death rates occurring among the older incarcerated population.12 Lastly, age of the prison was not predictive of profile membership which suggests that building new prisons will not mitigate the public health crisis of COVID-19 infections in the prison environment.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, we did not account or control for other potentially important prison characteristics. Second, the current study only examines Texas prison facilities and may not be generalizable to other state prison systems. Third, data is updated daily, therefore the number of tests, cases, and deaths of incarcerated individuals and staff will change as time progresses and our results only captures data up to July 24, 2020.

Conclusions

We implemented a unique data-driven statistical technique to divide prisons into clusters based upon reported levels of infections and deaths at the state level. These findings should inform researchers, prison administrators, lawmakers, public health officials, and other professionals interested in reducing the impact of COVID-19 in our nation’s prisons. Importantly, housing people incarcerated at 85% of facility capacity may minimize the rate of infection and death in state prisons.

Data Availability

These data are publically available from the COVID Prison Project and available from the authors on request.

https://covidprisonproject.com/

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Akiyama MJ, Spaulding AC, Rich JD. Flattening the curve for incarcerated populations - Covid-19 in jails and prisons. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Saloner B, Parish K, Ward JA, Dilaura G, Dolovich S. COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in Federal and State Prisons. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Gunter A, Sosland H. COVID-19 in Prisons: The Latest Numbers in 3 Graphs. https://csgjusticecenter.org/covid-19-in-prisons-the-latest-numbers-in-3-graphs/. Published 2020. Accessed June 8, 2020.
  4. 4.↵
    COVID Prison Project. https://covidprisonproject.com/. Published 2020.
  5. 5.↵
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA Muthén Muthén. 2017. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01711.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthen BO. Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modelling. Struct Equ Model. 2007.
  7. 7.↵
    Lanza ST, Flaherty BP, Collins LM. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis. In: Handbook of Psychology.; 2003. doi: 10.1002/0471264385.wei0226
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Asparouhov T, Muthen BO. Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: A 3-step approach ising Mplus. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 2014; 21(3): 329–341. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    No U, Hong S. A Comparison of Mixture Modeling Approaches in Latent Class Models With External Variables Under Small Samples. Educ Psychol Meas. 2018; 78(6): 925–951. doi: 10.1177/0013164417726828
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Henry BF. Social Distancing and Incarceration: Policy and Management Strategies to Reduce COVID-19 Transmission and Promote Health Equity Through Decarceration. Heal Educ Behav. 2020. doi: 10.1177/1090198120927318
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Hawks L, Woolhandler S, McCormick D. COVID-19 in Prisons and Jails in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2020: E1–E2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1856
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Prost SG, Archuleta AJ, Golder S. Older adults incarcerated in state prison: health and quality of life disparities between age cohorts. Aging Ment Heal. 2019. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1693976
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 10, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prison population reductions and COVID-19: A latent profile analysis synthesizing recent evidence from the Texas state prison system
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Prison population reductions and COVID-19: A latent profile analysis synthesizing recent evidence from the Texas state prison system
Noel Vest, Oshea Johnson, Kathryn Nowotny, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
medRxiv 2020.09.08.20190884; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190884
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Prison population reductions and COVID-19: A latent profile analysis synthesizing recent evidence from the Texas state prison system
Noel Vest, Oshea Johnson, Kathryn Nowotny, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
medRxiv 2020.09.08.20190884; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190884

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (504)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1238)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (531)
  • Epidemiology (10021)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (499)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2453)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1643)
  • Health Policy (752)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (533)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11864)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2280)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (536)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (157)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (730)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (313)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4833)
  • Radiology and Imaging (837)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (491)
  • Respiratory Medicine (651)
  • Rheumatology (285)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (238)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (267)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)