Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The relationship between cognitive function and sleep duration: a Mendelian randomisation study

View ORCID ProfileAntoine Salzmann, View ORCID ProfileNish Chaturvedi, View ORCID ProfileVictoria Garfield
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190611
Antoine Salzmann
1MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E, 7HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Antoine Salzmann
  • For correspondence: antoine.salzmann.14@ucl.ac.uk
Nish Chaturvedi
1MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E, 7HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nish Chaturvedi
Victoria Garfield
1MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E, 7HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Victoria Garfield
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Structured abstract

Importance Sleep duration is associated with cognitive function, with Mendelian randomisation evidence supporting a relationship in this direction. However, whether cognitive function may also precede problematic sleep duration remains unclear.

Objective To assess whether reaction time and visual memory are causally associated with sleep duration.

Design Summary-level Mendelian randomisation design between visual memory (30 SNPs), reaction time (44 SNPs), and self-reported and objective sleep duration Setting: Population-based study.

Participants Individuals from the UK Biobank, who were included in genome-wide association studies for our exposures and outcomes, aged 40-69y at baseline (mean 56y), 54% female and self-reported sleep was 7.2 hours.

Exposures Visual memory, reactiontime

Main outcomes self-reported and objective sleep duration

Results Mendelian randomisation results showed that worse performance on the visual memory task was associated with longer (ß=0.09, 95% CI=0.02;0.17), while slower reaction time was associated with shorter (ß=-0.15, 95% CI=-0.29;-0.01), objective sleep duration. Sensitivity analyses revealed no issues with horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept p-value <0.05). No association was observed between either cognitive measure and self-reported sleep duration.

Conclusions and relevance These results suggest a potential causative relationship between reaction time and objective sleep duration, where worse visual memory is associated with longer, and worse reaction time with shorter objective sleep duration. This study furthers our understanding of the relationship between brain health and sleep duration and sheds light on the causal nature of these associations.

Question Is genetically predicted sleep duration (accelerometer-derived and self-reported) associated with cognitive function outcomes?

Findings In this summary-level Mendelian randomisation study, worse visual memory was associated with longer, whereas worse reaction time was associated with shorter, objective sleep duration. No associations were observed between cognitive measures and self-reported sleep duration.

Meaning These findings suggest a causal association between cognition and objective sleep duration measures, expanding our understanding of the relationship between cognition and sleep.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

VG is funded by a joint Diabetes UK/British Heart Foundation grant (15/0005250). AS and NC are supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_ST_LHA_2019, MC_UU_0019/2).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Used previously published Genome Wide Association Study results. Relevant IRB approval were obtained for these studies and outlined in their research papers.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • - remove AD as exposure - Add visual memory as exposure - reformat for submission to journal

Data Availability

The study uses publicly available data from published Genome Wide Associations Studies.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 07, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The relationship between cognitive function and sleep duration: a Mendelian randomisation study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The relationship between cognitive function and sleep duration: a Mendelian randomisation study
Antoine Salzmann, Nish Chaturvedi, Victoria Garfield
medRxiv 2020.09.08.20190611; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190611
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The relationship between cognitive function and sleep duration: a Mendelian randomisation study
Antoine Salzmann, Nish Chaturvedi, Victoria Garfield
medRxiv 2020.09.08.20190611; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190611

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (110)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (422)
  • Epidemiology (8989)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (420)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1959)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (402)
  • Health Informatics (1329)
  • Health Policy (660)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10809)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1830)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (999)
  • Ophthalmology (298)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (580)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1904)
  • Public and Global Health (4123)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (549)
  • Rheumatology (225)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (81)