Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Strategies for exiting COVID-19 lockdown for workplace and school: a scoping review protocol

View ORCID ProfileDaniela D’Angelo, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, View ORCID ProfileAlice Josephine Fauci, View ORCID ProfileRoberto Latina, View ORCID ProfileLaura Iacorossi, View ORCID ProfileMarco Di Nitto, Primiano Iannone
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.20187971
Daniela D’Angelo
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniela D’Angelo
Daniela Coclite
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonello Napoletano
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alice Josephine Fauci
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alice Josephine Fauci
Roberto Latina
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto Latina
Laura Iacorossi
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Iacorossi
Marco Di Nitto
2Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata. Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marco Di Nitto
  • For correspondence: marcodinitto93@gmail.com
Primiano Iannone
1National Center of Clinical Excellence, Healthcare Quality and Safety (CNEC), National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective The main objectives of this review are to summarise the existing literature and to identify strategies for exiting lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on reopening schools and returning to work.

Introduction After months of strict quarantine, several countries are planning exit strategies to progressively lift social restrictions without giving rise to an increase in the number of COVID-19 cases. Although several strategies have been studied in terms of how and when to relax such stringent constraints, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal strategy for managing the pandemic beyond lockdown. The risks posed by delaying return to work and school openings are real and sizeable, particularly for relevant working sectors and for students from low-income families

Inclusion criteria This review will consider studies that focussed on relaxation strategies for lockdown exit among workers and students facing an epidemic /pandemic crisis.

Methods The searches will be conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciSearch, Google Scholar), and the bibliography of all selected studies will be hand-searched. In addition, because the topic is new, relevant literature will be checked using daily, updated COVID-19 collections from NCBI (LitCovid) and MedRxiv servers. Studies published in English, German, Spanish, Italian and French will be included, with no limits on publication dates. This review will consider all study designs, regardless of their rigor. The review method will be based on a two-phase approach: a title and abstract screening, and a full-text review performed by two independent researchers. Data will be summarised and categorised, and results will be presented in a tabular/diagrammatic form.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This is a scoping review protocol and no ethical approval is needed

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

This is a scoping review protocol so no data are included in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 07, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strategies for exiting COVID-19 lockdown for workplace and school: a scoping review protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Strategies for exiting COVID-19 lockdown for workplace and school: a scoping review protocol
Daniela D’Angelo, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Alice Josephine Fauci, Roberto Latina, Laura Iacorossi, Marco Di Nitto, Primiano Iannone
medRxiv 2020.09.04.20187971; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.20187971
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Strategies for exiting COVID-19 lockdown for workplace and school: a scoping review protocol
Daniela D’Angelo, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Alice Josephine Fauci, Roberto Latina, Laura Iacorossi, Marco Di Nitto, Primiano Iannone
medRxiv 2020.09.04.20187971; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.20187971

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1254)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10043)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2477)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1650)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11886)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2298)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1255)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (736)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2291)
  • Public and Global Health (4849)
  • Radiology and Imaging (844)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)