Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 worldwide

View ORCID ProfileElisabeth L. Zeilinger, View ORCID ProfileIngo W. Nader, Dana Jomar, Clemens Zauchner
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.02.20185660
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger
1Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elisabeth L. Zeilinger
  • For correspondence: elisabeth.zeilinger@univie.ac.at
Ingo W. Nader
2IT Power Services GmbH, Trubelgasse 8/10-11, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ingo W. Nader
Dana Jomar
2IT Power Services GmbH, Trubelgasse 8/10-11, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Zauchner
2IT Power Services GmbH, Trubelgasse 8/10-11, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the initial phase of the global COVID-19 outbreak, most countries responded with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). The effectiveness of these NPIs has been investigated with simulation studies, that rely on assumptions and by empirical studies with few countries and controversial results. However, it has not been investigated in detail how long different NPIs need to be in place to take effect, or how long they should be in place for their maximum effect to unfold. We used global data and a non-parametric machine learning model to estimate the effects of NPIs in relation to how long they have been in place. Here we show that closure and regulation of schools was the most important NPI, associated with a pronounced effect about 10 days after implementation. Restrictions of mass gatherings and restrictions and regulations of businesses were found to have a more gradual effect, and social distancing was associated with a delayed effect starting about 18 days after implementation. Generally, effects increased until about 40 to 50 days after implementation. Our results can inform political decisions regarding the choice of NPIs and how long they need to be in place to take effect.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No ethical approval was necessary due to the nature of the study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used in this analysis is publicly available. The time series of cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases was downloaded from https://data.humdata.org/dataset/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases, the government response dataset (CoronaNet) was downloaded from https://github.com/saudiwin/corona_tscs, and the Word Banks development indicators were downloaded via the R package wbstats.31 The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 worldwide
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 worldwide
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Ingo W. Nader, Dana Jomar, Clemens Zauchner
medRxiv 2020.09.02.20185660; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.02.20185660
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 worldwide
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Ingo W. Nader, Dana Jomar, Clemens Zauchner
medRxiv 2020.09.02.20185660; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.02.20185660

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (160)
  • Allergy and Immunology (412)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (855)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (156)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (247)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (392)
  • Epidemiology (8534)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (381)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1739)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (370)
  • Health Informatics (1234)
  • Health Policy (618)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (369)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10271)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (552)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (210)
  • Neurology (1666)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (247)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (325)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (925)
  • Ophthalmology (262)
  • Orthopedics (100)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (110)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (249)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (246)
  • Primary Care Research (205)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1757)
  • Public and Global Health (3826)
  • Radiology and Imaging (622)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (317)
  • Respiratory Medicine (518)
  • Rheumatology (207)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (164)
  • Sports Medicine (156)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (100)
  • Urology (74)