Abstract
Cognitive explorations have demonstrated the activation of plastic mechanisms in slow-growing brain lesions, generating structural and functional changes. Due to its incidence, it is essential to investigate the reorganization of functional areas in brain tumor patients as well as formulating new approaches for predicting patient’s quality of life after tumor resection.
Following this perspective, we formulated an efficient methodology for postsurgical prognosis prediction, not only in terms of the structural damage but also to measure the neuroplastic changes associated with tumor appearence. Of note, most of previous studies employed a limited number of neuropsychological and clinical features for predicting patient prognosis. Our objective is to optimize the traditional model and to develop a method that can predict outcomes with high accuracy and identify the most significant features for cognitive impairment, working memory, executive control and language outcomes. Our approach is based on the inclusion of a large battery of neuropsychological tests as well as the introduction of grey and white matter morphological measures for model optimization. We employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes algorithms for testing the models and outcomes. Overall, SVM performance showed to be more accurate as compared to Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes. Specifically, we found that, by introducing connectivity variables (e.g., grey and white matter measures) Cognitive Status and Working Memory exhibited a predictive improvement. However, Language and Executive Control outcomes were not significantly predicted in none of the models. The importance of the present study resides in the employment of structural and functional variables for postsurgical outcome prediction. We found that connectivity variables are sensitive for predicting the postsurgical quality of life.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research was partially supported by grants RTI2018-093547-B-I00 entitled: Is the brain connectome a good predictor for the language network functional malleability?, from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Scientific Committee in Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language approved this research
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This Masters’ thesis dissertation was in the University of the Basque Country and Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
Data Availability
Data included in this research have no availability
