Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

24 People, one test: Boosting test efficiency using pooled serum antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2

Stefan Nessler, Jonas Franz, Franziska van der Meer, Konstantina Kolotourou, Vivek Venkataramani, Chalid Hasan, Beatrix Pollok-Kopp, Andreas E. Zautner, Christine Stadelmann, Michael Weig, Stefan Pöhlmann, Markus Hoffmann, Joachim Riggert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.20186130
Stefan Nessler
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stefan.nessler@med.uni-goettingen.de
Jonas Franz
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska van der Meer
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantina Kolotourou
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivek Venkataramani
2Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chalid Hasan
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrix Pollok-Kopp
3Department of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas E. Zautner
4Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Stadelmann
1Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Weig
4Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Pöhlmann
5Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany
6Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Hoffmann
5Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany
6Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Riggert
3Department of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Background The global pandemic of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), with different prevalence rates across countries and regions. Dynamic testing strategies are mandatory to establish efficient mitigation strategies against the disease; to be cost effective, they should adapt to regional prevalences. Seroprevalence surveys that detect individuals who have mounted an immune response against COVID-19 will help to determine the total number of infections within a community and improve the epidemiological calculations of attack and case fatality rates of the virus. They will also inform about the percentage of a population that might be immune against re-infections.

Methods We developed a sensitive and specific cell-based assay to detect conformational SARS-CoV-2 spike (SARS-2-S) S1 antibodies in human serum, and have cross-evaluated this assay against two FDA-approved SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. We performed pseudovirus neutralization assays to determine whether sera that were rated antibody-positive in our assay were able to specifically neutralize SARS-2-S. We pooled up to 24 sera and assessed the group testing performance of our cell-based assay. Group testing was further optimized by Monte Carlo like simulations and prospectively evaluated.

Findings Highly significant correlations could be established between our cell-based assay and commercial antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2. SARS-2-S S1 antibody-positive sera neutralized SARS-2-S but not SARS-S, and were sensitively and specifically detected in pools of 24 samples. Monte Carlo like simulations demonstrated that a simple two-step pooling scheme with fixed pool sizes performed at least equally as well as Dorfman’s optimal testing across a wide range of antibody prevalences.

Interpretation We demonstrate that a cell-based assay for SARS-2-S S1 antibodies qualifies for group testing of neutralizing anti-SARS-2-S antibodies. The assay can be combined with an easily implemented algorithm which greatly expands the screening capacity to detect anti-SARS-2-S antibodies across a wide range of antibody prevalences. It will thus improve population serological testing in many countries.

Funding This work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung within the network project RAPID (risk assessment in pre-pandemic respiratory infectious diseases [grant number 01KI1723D, S.P.]).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung within the network project RAPID (risk assessment in pre-pandemic respiratory infectious diseases [grant number 01KI1723D, S.P.]).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Written consent was obtained from all individuals and the study was approved by the local ethics committee (14/8/20).)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The raw data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
24 People, one test: Boosting test efficiency using pooled serum antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
24 People, one test: Boosting test efficiency using pooled serum antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2
Stefan Nessler, Jonas Franz, Franziska van der Meer, Konstantina Kolotourou, Vivek Venkataramani, Chalid Hasan, Beatrix Pollok-Kopp, Andreas E. Zautner, Christine Stadelmann, Michael Weig, Stefan Pöhlmann, Markus Hoffmann, Joachim Riggert
medRxiv 2020.09.01.20186130; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.20186130
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
24 People, one test: Boosting test efficiency using pooled serum antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2
Stefan Nessler, Jonas Franz, Franziska van der Meer, Konstantina Kolotourou, Vivek Venkataramani, Chalid Hasan, Beatrix Pollok-Kopp, Andreas E. Zautner, Christine Stadelmann, Michael Weig, Stefan Pöhlmann, Markus Hoffmann, Joachim Riggert
medRxiv 2020.09.01.20186130; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.20186130

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1254)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10043)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2477)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1650)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11886)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2298)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1255)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (736)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2291)
  • Public and Global Health (4849)
  • Radiology and Imaging (844)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)