Abstract
High frequency screening of populations has been proposed as a strategy in facilitating control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we use computational modeling, coupled with clinical data from a rapid antigen test, to predict the impact of frequent rapid testing on COVID-19 spread and outcomes. Using patient nasopharyngeal swab specimens, we demonstrate that the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen test compared to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) are 84.7% and 85.7%, respectively; moreover, sensitivity correlates directly with viral load. Based on COVID-19 data from three regions in the United States and Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil, we show that high frequency, strategic population-wide rapid testing, even at varied accuracy levels, diminishes COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths at a fraction of the cost of nucleic acid detection via qRT-PCR. We propose large-scale antigen-based surveillance as a viable strategy to control SARS-CoV-2 spread and to enable societal re-opening.
Competing Interest Statement
BN, AB, AR, MB, NS, AG, IB, and BBH are employed by or affiliated with E25Bio Inc. (www.e25bio.com), a company that develops diagnostics for epidemic viruses.
Funding Statement
We thank Professor Lee Gehrke for critical reading of the manuscript. The study is funded, in part, by a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Award (INV-017872) to E25Bio, Inc. EN is funded by Tufts University DISC Seed Grant. MLN is supported by a FAPESP grant (#2020/04836-0) and is a CNPq Research Fellow. AFV is supported by a FAPESP Fellow grant (#18/17647-0). GRFC is supported by a FAPESP Fellow grant (#20/07419-0). BHGAM is supported by a FAPESP Scholarship (#19/06572-2). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The primary study under which the samples and data were collected received ethical clearance from the Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP), protocol number 31588920.0.0000.5415. All excess samples and corresponding data were banked and de-identified prior to the analyses.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials; any other data will be made available upon request. Our code can be found on github: https://github.com/badeaa3/COVID19_Rapid_Testing.
