Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

View ORCID ProfileMichael Moor, View ORCID ProfileBastian Rieck, View ORCID ProfileMax Horn, View ORCID ProfileCatherine R. Jutzeler, View ORCID ProfileKarsten Borgwardt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185207
Michael Moor
*Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Moor
  • For correspondence: michael.moor@bsse.ethz.ch
Bastian Rieck
*Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bastian Rieck
Max Horn
*Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Max Horn
Catherine R. Jutzeler
*Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Catherine R. Jutzeler
Karsten Borgwardt
*Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karsten Borgwardt
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Sepsis is among the leading causes of death in intensive care units (ICU) world-wide and its recognition, particularly in the early stages of the disease, remains a medical challenge. The advent of an affluence of available digital health data has created a setting in which machine learning can be used for digital biomarker discovery, with the ultimate goal to advance the early recognition of sepsis.

Objective To systematically review and evaluate studies employing machine learning for the prediction of sepsis in the ICU.

Data sources Using Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, we systematically searched the existing literature for machine learning-driven sepsis onset prediction for patients in the ICU.

Study eligibility criteria All peer-reviewed articles using machine learning for the prediction of sepsis onset in adult ICU patients were included. Studies focusing on patient populations outside the ICU were excluded.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Moreover, a quality assessment of all eligible studies was performed.

Results Out of 974 identified articles, 22 and 21 met the criteria to be included in the systematic review and quality assessment, respectively. A multitude of machine learning algorithms were applied to refine the early prediction of sepsis. The quality of the studies ranged from “poor” (satisfying ≤ 40% of the quality criteria) to “very good” (satisfying ≥ 90% of the quality criteria). The majority of the studies (n = 19, 86.4%) employed an offline training scenario combined with a horizon evaluation, while two studies implemented an online scenario (n = 2, 9.1%). The massive inter-study heterogeneity in terms of model development, sepsis definition, prediction time windows, and outcomes precluded a meta-analysis. Last, only 2 studies provided publicly-accessible source code and data sources fostering reproducibility.

Limitations Articles were only eligible for inclusion when employing machine learning algorithms for the prediction of sepsis onset in the ICU. This restriction led to the exclusion of studies focusing on the prediction of septic shock, sepsis-related mortality, and patient populations outside the ICU.

Conclusions and key findings A growing number of studies employs machine learning to optimise the early prediction of sepsis through digital biomarker discovery. This review, however, highlights several shortcomings of the current approaches, including low comparability and reproducibility. Finally, we gather recommendations how these challenges can be addressed before deploying these models in prospective analyses.

Systematic review registration number CRD42020200133

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the Strategic Focal Area "Personalized Health and Related Technologies (PHRT)" of the ETH Domain for the SPHN/PHRT Driver Project 'Personalized Swiss Sepsis Study' (Borgwardt, #2017-110) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione Grant, PZ00P3-186101, Jutzeler). The funders had no role in study design, data collection andanalysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NA

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • firstname.lastname{at}bsse.ethz.ch

Data Availability

We make all used study data available.

https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/sepsis-prediction-review

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 02, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
Michael Moor, Bastian Rieck, Max Horn, Catherine R. Jutzeler, Karsten Borgwardt
medRxiv 2020.08.31.20185207; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185207
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
Michael Moor, Bastian Rieck, Max Horn, Catherine R. Jutzeler, Karsten Borgwardt
medRxiv 2020.08.31.20185207; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185207

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (134)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1744)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (649)
  • Epidemiology (10769)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (582)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2927)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (530)
  • Health Informatics (1917)
  • Health Policy (832)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (740)
  • Hematology (289)
  • HIV/AIDS (626)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12493)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (318)
  • Neurology (2777)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (596)
  • Oncology (1451)
  • Ophthalmology (440)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (254)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (378)
  • Pediatrics (863)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (361)
  • Primary Care Research (333)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2625)
  • Public and Global Health (5331)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1001)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (592)
  • Respiratory Medicine (721)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (124)