Abstract
Objectives Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) contribute to poor outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). With the paucity of effective treatments, we describe our experience with intrathecal (IT) nicardipine for this indication.
Methods Patients admitted to Emory University Hospital Neuroscience ICU between 2012-2017 with non-traumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. This patient cohort was compared using a propensity-score model to patients in the SAH international trialist (SAHIT) repository who did not receive intrathecal nicardipine. The primary outcome was DCI. Secondary outcomes were long-term functional outcome and adverse events.
Results The analysis included 1,351 patients, 422 of whom were diagnosed with cerebral vasospasm and treated with IT nicardipine. When compared with patients with no vasospasm (n=859) the treated group was younger (51.1±12.4 vs. 56.7±14.1, p<0.01), had a higher World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score (WFNS), modified Fisher grade, and more likely to undergo clipping of the ruptured aneurysm as compared to endovascular treatment (30.3% vs. 11.3%, p<0.01). Treatment with IT nicardipine decreased daily mean transcranial Doppler velocities in 77.3% of the treated patients. When compared to patients not receiving IT nicardipine, treatment was not associated with an increase rate of bacterial ventriculitis (3.1% compared with 2.7%, p>0.1) yet higher rates of ventriculoperitoneal shunting were noted (19.9% vs. 8.8%, p<0.01). In a propensity score comparison to the SAHIT database, the odds ratio to develop DCI with IT nicardipine treatment was 0.61 with 95% CI[0.44-0.84], and to have a favorable functional outcome (mRS≤2) was 2.17[1.61-2.91].
Conclusions IT nicardipine was associated with improved outcome and reduced DCI compared with propensity matched controls. There was an increased need for permanent CSF diversion but no other safety issues. This data should be considered when selecting medications and treatments to study in future randomized controlled clinical trial for SAH.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was internally funded
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Emory University IRB, Atlanta, GA, USA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
An error in figure 1A&B was corrected.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
