ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) are a game changer in the treatment of various metastasized cancers, but emerging reports of adverse events, including ICPI-associated autoimmune encephalitis (ICPI-AIE), are concerning. We aimed to collect all published cases of ICPI-AIE to identify the salient clinical and laboratory features of this disorder.
METHODS We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Embase for ICPI-AIE cases from the first description in 2015 until 01/2020 using standard bibliographic measures including PRISMA guidelines and pre-registration with PROSPERO (CRD42019139838).
RESULTS Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, resulting in 54 ICPI-AIE patients (mean age 58.6 years; 43% females). Common cancers included melanoma (30%) and non-small cell lung cancer (30%). Brain metastases were found in 16 patients (30%). The most frequent ICPI was nivolumab (61%). Onset of ICPI-AIE occurred on average after 3.5 treatment cycles, but very early and late presentations were common. Non-limbic AIE was roughly twice as frequent as limbic AIE (p<0.05). The most common laboratory abnormalities included bitemporal FLAIR lesions on MRI, continuous slow waves and diffuse slowing on EEG, and monocytic pleocytosis on cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Of note, intraneuronal antibodies were more frequent than neuronal surface antibodies, and logistic regression identified the presence of intracellular antibodies as a significant predictor for lack of improvement after 1st line immunotherapy (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS ICPI-AIE consists of a heterogenous group of conditions. Neurologists will likely encounter ICPI-AIE more often in the future, but important unresolved questions include the exact pathophysiological mechanisms, the epidemiology and the best treatment approaches associated with ICPI-AIE.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review, so no IRB required
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable - all relevant data are presented in the Tables and the main manuscript body
