Abstract
A mathematical model for the transmission dynamics of Coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) is proposed by incorporating self-protection behavior changes in the population. The disease-free equilibrium point is computed and its stability analysis is studied. The basic reproduction number(R0) of the model is computed and the disease-free equilibrium point is locally and globally stable for R0 < 1 and unstable for R0 > 1. Based on the available data the unknown model parameters are estimated using a combination of least square and Bayesian estimation methods for different countries. Using forward sensitivity index the model parameters is carried out to determine and identify the key factors for the spread of disease dynamics. From country to country the sensitive parameters for the spread of the virus varies. It is found out that the reproduction number depends mostly on the infection rates, the threshold value of the force of infection for a population, the recovery rates, and the virus decay rate in the environment. It is also demonstrated that control of the effective transmission rate (recommended human behavioral change towards self-protective measures) is essential to stop the spreading of the virus. Numerical simulations also show that the virus’s transmission dynamics depend mostly on those sensitive parameters.
1 Introduction
The outbreak of coronavirus was first informed to the World Health Organization (WHO) as pneumonia of unknown cause on December 31, 2019 in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China. As of 10 January 2020, the virus causing the outbreak was further determined by gene sequencing to be the new novel coronavirus, the same category as the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome virus (MERS-CoV) and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome virus (SARSCoV) [16]. On 30 January 2020, the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared as a public health emergency of international concern, the highest level in the emergency response for infectious diseases [9]. The rapid spread of this virus with consequences on an international scale, COVID19 was declared a pandemic by the WHO on March 11, 2020 [1]. The global report of COVID-19 by WHO indicated that on August 16, 2020, above 21.2 million people were infected with the virus and over 761,779 were died [22]. The outbreak of the disease is still rapidly increasing in South American, North American, Asian and African Countries at an alarming rate.
The novel coronavirus is a respiratory virus that spreads primarily through droplets of saliva or discharge from the nose generated when an infected person coughs or sneezes [1]. Individuals can also be infected from contacting surfaces contaminated with the virus and touching their eyes, nose and mouth. The COVID-19 virus may survive on surfaces for long periods with the right environmental conditions [23]. Understanding the transmission characteristics of the diseases in communities, regions, and countries leads to better approaches to decrease the transmission of these diseases [12].
There is no known curing medicine nor vaccine to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. However, most symptoms can be treated and getting early care from a healthcare provider can make the disease less dangerous. There are several clinical trials that are being conducted to evaluate potential therapeutics for COVID-19 [23]. Standard recommendations by WHO to prevent the spread of COVID-19 include frequent cleaning of hands using soap or alcohol-based sanitizer, covering the nose and mouth with a flexed elbow or disposable tissue when coughing and sneezing, and avoiding close contact with anyone that has a fever and cough [23]. The awareness of individuals for applying these preventive mechanisms vary from region to region and from country to country. In some places, protective measures are employed by volunteer individuals while in some other places, governments impose some kind of rules on the population to use strict physical distancing and wearing face masks at public places [14].
Mathematical models have become important tools in understanding and analyzing the spread and control of infectious diseases, which clarifies variables and parameters to obtain conceptual results such as basic reproduction numbers [24]. Mathematical models and computer simulations are useful for determining sensitivities to change in parameter values, and estimating key parameters from data which can contribute to identifying trends, make general forecasts, and estimate the uncertainty in forecasts [12]. Understanding the virus dynamics and host response is essential in formulating strategies for antiviral treatment, vaccination, and epidemiological control of COVID-19 [7]. The analysis from mathematical models may assist decision makers to estimate the risk and the potential future growth of the disease in the population [14].
Since epidemiological and mathematical models play a fundamental role in the study of the dynamics of such COVID-19, various models have been used to investigate the transmission dynamics of the pandemic [4, 18, 13, 8, 27, 25, 11, 32]. In [25] a generalized SEIR model was developed to analyze this epidemic. Based on the public data of the National Health Commission of China from Jan. 20th to Feb. 9th, 2020, they estimate epidemic parameters and make predictions on the possible ending time for 5 different regions.
Behavior change towards using preventive mechanisms by the population to protect themselves from an infectious disease are assumed to be dependent on the way that the disease is transmitted and its fatality [15]. Individuals who have awareness about the disease and decided to use preventive mechanisms have less susceptibility than those without awareness and demonstrating the usual risky behavior [14, 30]. In this paper, we propose SEIRDM mathematical model for the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 by introducing a behavior change function.
In order to get better predictions and to design and analyse various intervention strategies, one needs to estimate the model parameters from existing epidemiological data. It is most unusual to estimate parameter values from observed data in dynamical systems. But some authors estimate parameters based on the available data to determine the effects of various epidemiological factors on disease transmission and possible control strategy. Least Squares Support Vector Machines for parameter estimation of time invariant and time varying dynamical systems are used in [20]. Biegler and Grossmann [2] employed optimization techniques based on the seasonal data with the SIRS epidemic model in order to estimate the parameters of a generalized incidence rate function. The SIR model parameters were numerically estimated in [5] using the least squares method. In our case, the model parameters are inferred or estimated from observed data for different countries use a modified Bayesian approach combined with least square techniques. Sensitivity analysis of the model parameters is carried out to determine and identify the key factors for the spread of disease dynamics. We use forward sensitivity analysis to identify the most sensitive parameters.
The paper is organized as follows: The mathematical model is formulated and described in Section 2. The qualitative analysis of the model by examining the equilibrium points and its stability analysis is studied in Section 3. Numerical simulations of the model by estimating the parameters are given in Section 4. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number for the model with respect to the parameters is also discussed in this section. Conclusions and recommendations of the study are given in Section 5.
2 Model Formulation
The model subdivides the human population into five disjoint compartments; Susceptible, Exposed, Infected, Recovered, death; and one compartment which is the contaminated material or surface. We consider the following basic assumptions to formulate the model.
The transmission dynamics of COVID-19 is similar to the SEIR model. We add the death compartment for which individuals die via the virus, in account with they may also die via the natural death.
We consider the contribution of the asymptomatic infectious individuals in the transmission dynamics of disease in the population.
The effect of indirect transmission of the disease through virus concentration in the environment due to shedding by infectious is considered.
We apply behavior change towards self-protective measures by the population to protect themselves from the virus.
We will then propose a mathematical model and analyze the effect of these factors to investigate in terms of their contribution to prevent the spread of disease.
The model state variables and parameters with their meanings are given in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.
The Subdivided Compartments in our Model
Description of the model parameters
The total population at time t, denoted by N(t), is given by
The flow diagram of the model is illustrated in Figure 1.
Based on our assumptions and the flow diagram, it results in systems of the following non-linear differential equations:
with non negative initial conditions S(0) > 0, E(0) ≥ 0, I(0) ≥ 0, R(0) ≥ 0, D(0) ≥ 0 and M(0) ≥ 0.
The flow Diagram for the Model of COVID-19 Pandemic
2.1 Model Description
The susceptible population is increased by the recruitment of individuals into the population, at a rate Λ. All human individuals suffer from natural death, at a constant rate µ. Susceptible individuals acquire COVID-19 infection from individuals with exposed classes at a rate αe and the infected class at a rate λ. The behavior change function e and the force of infection λ are given by
where β1 is the rate of virus transmission directly from humans, β2 is the rate of virus transmission from the environment, K is the pathogen concentration in the environment that yields 50% of chance for a susceptible individual to catch the viral infection from the environment, λ0 is the value of the force of infection corresponding to the threshold infectivity in which individuals start reacting swiftly (that means, the point at which the behavior change function changes its concavity) and n is a hill coefficient that portrays the rate of reaction by the population. The modification parameter ν ≥ 1 accounts for the relative infectiousness of individuals with COVID19 symptoms, in comparison to those infected with the virus and with no symptoms. Individuals with virus symptoms are more infectious than that of without symptom because they have a higher viral load and there is a positive correlation between viral load and infectiousness [29].
At the beginning of an outbreak, individuals understand very little about the virus; there could be no reaction and this can be related to the situation at the disease-free equilibrium such that e(λ)= e(0) = 0. However, as the risk of the disease increases, individuals start to think of the type of measures to take in order to avoid all means of contracting the disease. These protection measures, if perfect, account for an increase in the values of e to unity. The order n of the function e(λ) is a Hill coefficient that portrays the rate of reaction by the population [15].
The rate of dissemination of information α describes the awareness of individuals from the disease. Individuals acquire information through multiple ways, such as TV news, reports on a network, mouth-to-mouth communication, or even education. The information individuals gathered is an essential factor which impacts how individuals react to the disease transmission and individuals make behavior changes to keep themselves from infection based on the information available to them during the pandemic [35].
Individuals leave the exposed class E by becoming symptomatic, at a rate (1 − η)λ with the average effectiveness of existing self-preventive measures η ≤ 1, or recovered at rate θ. Individuals with the symptoms of COVID-19 disease dies due to the virus-induced death at a rate δ. The infected individuals also become recovered at a rate γ. We assume that the recovered individuals R acquire partial immunity. The released COVID-19 from the exposed and infected individuals through coughing or sneezing landed on materials or surfaces around them and become infected at a rate ϵ and ξ, respectively [14, 30]. The virus decays from the infected surfaces with the decay rate of ψ.
3 Analysis of the Model
In this section, we will see the qualitative analysis of the model Equation (1) by examining the equilibrium points and its stability analysis.
3.1 Well-Posedness
Let us begin understanding the dynamics of a model by examining the behavior about its steady states. We first show that the model is well posed in a biologically feasible domain, and then proceed with a stability analysis of the steady states of the model.
Theorem 3.1
There exists a unique solution to the system of equations (1) in the region
If S(0) > 0,E(0) ≥ 0,I(0) ≥ 0,R(0) ≥ 0,D(0) ≥ 0 and M(0) ≥ 0, then S(t) > 0,E(t) ≥ 0,I(t) ≥ 0,R(t) ≥ 0,D(t) ≥ 0 and M(t) ≥ 0 for all t ≥ 0.
The solution trajectories of the model equations (1) evolve in abounded and positive invariant region
Proof
The Well-Posedness of the Model is proved as follow:
All the functions on the right hand side of Equation (1) are C1 on ℝ6. Thus, by the Picard–Lindelöf theorem [28], equations (1) has a unique solution.
The positivity of model state variables are proved based on proposition A.1 in [31]. Let the model equations (1) be written in the form x′= F (x, t), where x =(S, E, I, R, D, M), and
. The functions F (x, t) on the right hand side of equations (1) have the property of F (S, E, I, R, D, M, t) ≥ 0 whenever x ∈ [0, ∞)n ,xj =0,t ≥ 0. Here our xj’s are x1 = S, x2 = E, x3 = I, x4 = R, x5 = D and x6 = M. By Theorem 3.1 (1), there exists a unique solution for the model Equations (1). Thus, it follows from the Proposition that x(t) ∈ [0, ∞)n for all t ≥ t0 ≥ 0 whenever x(t0) ≥ 0.The change of total population N(t)= S(t)+ E(t)+I(t)+ R(t)+ D(t) at time t is governed by N′(t)= S′(t)+ E′(t)+ I′(t)+ R′(t)+ D′(t). That is:
The solution for this linear first order ode is
. Thus, for the initial data , we obtain
Moreover, for the environmental variable M, we have
As E(t) and I(t) are less than
. Using the same procedure or by applying the Gronwall inequality, for , we obtain:
If x0 is a point in D, then the solution of the initial value problem (1), exists for all times t ≥ 0 by 3.1 (1). By the result of Theorem 3.1 (2), the solution lies in D, for all t ≥ 0. Hence the region Ω is positive invariant.
Then we will analyze the model quantitative behaviors in the domain Ω.
3.2 Local Stability of Disease-free Equilibrium (DFE)
The equilibrium solutions of the model are obtained by setting the right-hand side of equation (1) equal to zero:
The disease-free equilibrium point of our model is obtained by setting the disease state variables E = 0 and I = 0. If E = 0 and I = 0, then R = 0 and D = 0. It is then denoted and given by:
Now let us calculate basic reproduction number denoted by R0, and defined as the average number of secondary infections produced by a single infected individual in a totally susceptible population. Using the next generation matrix method [33], the basic reproduction number is calculated as follows. From the model equation (1), using the notation X =(E, I, M), we have the vector functions:
representing the appearance of new infections, and the transfer of individuals in to and out of the infected compartments, respectively. The Jacobian matrices of 
and 
are, respectively
where p1 = μ + θ, p2 = μ + δ + γ and the entries of F and V are obtained by 
and 
respectively. It is easy to calculate the inverse of V and given by
The next-generation matrix FV−1 is
and its eigen values are λ1 = 0, λ2 = 0 and 
. The spectral radius (the largest eigen value) of the next generation matrix is the basic reproduction number of the model. Hence we have the following result.
Theorem 3.2
The basic reproduction number of the model equation (1) is given by
Remark 3.3
In general, if R0 > 1, then, on average, the number of new infections resulting from one infected individual is greater than one. Thus, COVID-19 infections will persist in the populations. If R0 < 1, then, on average, the number of new infections generated by one infected individual is less than one. This implies that the infections will eventually disappear from the populations. This threshold can as well be used to depict parameters which are most important during the infection.
The local stability analysis of the equilibrium points are analyzed using linearization. For n = 1, the expression αe is simplified as 
, where,
The Jacobean matrix of the model equation (1) is
where,
Here
Theorem 3.4
The disease-free equilibrium point ε0 is locally asymptotically stable if R0 < 1 and unstable if R0 > 1.
Proof
The locally asymptotical stablility of ε0 is obtained use the sign of the eigenvalues of Jacobian matrix at the disease-free equilibrium point ε0. Substituting the equilibrium point with 
(at the disease-free equilibrium, the total population N is equal to the total susceptible S population) in the matrix equation (3), we have:
By expanding the characteristic equation |λI −J(ε0)| = 0 with the first, fourth and fifth columns, we obtain three eigenvalues λ1,2,3 = −µ. The remaining three eigenvalues are obtained from the reduced matrix
The characteristic equation of J3 is a third degree polynomial which is given by:
where
The sign of D1, D2 and D3 are positive if R0 < 1. It is also true that D1D2 >D3. Using Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion the disease-free equilibrium point ε0 is stable if R0 < 1 and unstable if R0 > 1.
3.3 Global Stability of Disease-free Equilibrium
Let us rewrite our model system (1) as
where X =(S, R, D) and Z =(E,I,M), with the components of 
denoting the number of uninfected individuals and 
denoting the number of infected ones [6]. The disease-free equilibrium is denoted now as
The conditions (H1) and (H2) below must be met to guarantee global asymptotically stability: (H1) For 
, U0 is globally asymptotically stable;
(H2) G(X, Z)= AZ − Ĝ(X, Z),Ĝ(X, Z) ≥ 0 for (X, Z) ∈ Ω, where A = DZ G(U0, 0) is a Metzler matrix (the off diagonal elements of A are non-negative) and Ω is the region where the model makes biological sense.
Theorem 3.5
The disease-free equilibrium point U0 =(x0, 0) is a globally asymptotically stable equilibrium of (1) if R0 < 1 and the assumptions (H1) and (H2) are satisfied.
Proof
We have
Therefore,
Here Ĝ(X, Z)= AZ − G(X, Z), and so,
Since 
and (1 − η) ≤ 1,
Taking N as a common factor, implying
It follows that Ĝ1(X, Z) ≥ 0,Ĝ2(X, Z) ≥ 0 and Ĝ3(X, Z) = 0. Thus, Ĝ ≥ 0. Conditions (H1) and (H2) are satisfied, and we conclude that U0 is globally asymptotically stable for R0 < 1. □
4 Parameter Estimation and Numerical Simulations
In this section, we discuss and estimate the parameter choices and the numerical solutions of the model equations (1). We outline the initial conditions and fit the existing WHO data with the model for that choice of parameters.
4.1 Parameter Estimation
The systems of model equations (1) can be expressed as a dynamical system of the form:
where t is the independent variable (time), X is the state vector of the system, 
, X =[x1,…,xN′], F =[f1, …, fN′] and N′ is the number of compartments in the population. Φ=[ϕ1,…,ϕp] are p unknown parameters of the system and x0 are the initial values [20].
In order to estimate the unknown parameters Φ, the state variable X(t) is observed at L time instants t1,…,tT, so that we have
where Y (ti) is the observed values of the state variables at time instant ti and 
are the difference between the observed value yi and the corresponding fitted value xi i.e., Ei = yi − xi. The objective is to determine appropriate parameter values so that the sum of squared errors between the outputs of the estimated model (X(t)) and the measured data (Y (t)) should be minimized.
We wish to find the vector of least-square estimators, Φ, that minimizes
To find the values of parameters Φ that minimizes Equation (5), various methods have been used for handling this problem. The first technique is to differentiate 
with respect to each Φ and set the results equal to zero to obtain a system of equations that can be solved simultaneously for the Φ’s [21].
To estimate the model parameters we use two step approach
The first approach requires solving the ordinary differential equation (1). As using analytic methods are difficult, we the numerical techniques to solve ode’s like runge-kutta methods.
The second approach is finding the optimization algorithm to update the parameters based on equation (5)
The process of updating the parameters continues until no significant improvement(convergence) in the objective function is observed. We use a type of Bayesian technique to estimate the unknown parameters and to solve the optimization algorithm.
In this parameter estimation procedure, we modified and combined the Bayesian estimation technique with methods of least square technique. The acceptance and rejection procedure in Metropolis Hasting (MH) algorithm is replaced by comparing the minimum of the sum squared errors between the proposed parameter and the previously assigned parameter. Φ = [ϕ1, …, ϕp] is a vector of parameters, where, p is the number of parameters to be estimated. In our case the number of parameters is p = 15. We take one parameter at a time and consider the other parameters held constant in the objective function,
i.e
This is a kind of Gibbs Sampling technique for parameter estimation [10]. By combining these parameter estimation techniques we estimate all vector of parameters until convergence.
First, we have to initialize the parameters in their parameter space and propose the next parameter value by sampling from the proposal density. The proposal density we assign 
, where c1 is tuning value which is a small number and help us to move the parameter ϕi up and down through the parameter estimation process. A rough outline of the algorithm is given in Algorithm (1).
Algorithm 1
MH algorithm with Least square Input: B (number of iteration), ϕ0 (initial value for parameters), Y (Observed data)
Convergence analysis of the parameter estimation is assessed by line plots of separate parameters.
4.2 Numerical Results and Discussion
The parameters must be estimated and assigned a value in order to make the model operable. In this paper, we use total active cases, totally recovered and total death data extracted from WHO situation reports 1 − 192, and worldometer [34], with the daily data from January 21, 2020 to August 16, 2020. We use this data in parameter estimation for countries such as China, Italy, Brazil, South Africa, and Ethiopia. We denote the observed data Y =[I, R, D] with having different length of time T for those countries. The goal is to find the value of the parameters which minimize the squared errors between the model predictions and the observed data. We also use different initial states of the dynamics for each of the countries. We take initial values for Infected(I0), Recovered(R0) and Death(D0) cases reasonably the same as the observed data Y0, and we make the assumption that about 80% of the disease is asymptomatic which helps us to outline the initial value for Exposed(E0). By an initial guess of the parameters ϕ0 we use B = 10, 000 number of iterations for estimation in the MH algorithm.
Based on the available data and the prediction of the proposed model the error terms are computed at the three state compartments. The parameter update is based on the minimization of sum squared differences between measurements and the model predictions.
The convergence analysis of some estimated parameters is given in Figure (2) and our parameter estimation algorithm seems to converge at 2,000 iterations. We take the values at the final iteration as the estimated parameter value for the proposed model. The estimated values of parameters for the countries China, Italy, Ethiopia, South Africa, and Brazil are given in Table (3).
Convergence analysis of a sample of parameters for the COVID-19 induced death rate δ, recovery rate γ and the contact rates β1, β2.
Estimated Parameter Values at the End of 10,000 Iterations
From the estimated parameter values in Table (3) the natural death rate µ is relatively higher in Ethiopia and South Africa while the induced death rate due to COVID-19 δ is relatively higher in Italy.
Figures (3) shows the fitted model with the observed data for South Africa. The estimated parameters for the infected compartment is well fitted and approximated compared with the observed data. It is also shown that the recovered and death compartment has relatively small under predictions.
Numerical results of the fitted and observed values of Infected, Recovered and Death cases for South Africa.
The Figures in (4) shows the fitted model with the observed data for Brazil. We observe that the estimated parameters for the infected and recovered compartments are well fitted and approximated compared with the observed data. The death compartment has relatively small over predictions.
Numerical results of the fitted and observed values of Infected, Recovered and Death cases for Brazil.
The Figures (5) shows the fitted model with the observed values for Ethiopian data. We see that the estimated parameters for the infected and recovered compartments are well fitted and approximated compared with the observed data. It is also shown that the death compartment have relatively small over predictions in Ethiopia.
The numerical results of the fitted and observed values of Infected, Recovered and Death cases for Ethiopia.
4.3 Sensitivity of the Basic Reproduction Number
Sensitivity analysis is used to determine how sensitive a model is to changes in the value of the parameters and to changes in the structure of the model [3, 26]. In this paper, we focus on parameter sensitivity. Sensitivity analysis is a useful tool in model building as well as in model evaluation by showing how the model behavior responds to changes in parameter values [19].
Definition 4.1
The Sensitivity and elasticity indices of the basic reproduction ratio, R0 , with respect to model parameter p are respectively given by 
and 
. That is, the elasticity indices is given by 
[19, 17].
The graph in fig. 6 shows that in all countries the infection rates β1, β2, the recruitment rate Λ, the modification parameter ν and shedding rate of the virus from the infected class to the environment ξ has the highest elasticity indices with COVID-19 being positively correlated to R0. An increase in these parameters will increase the spread of COVID-19 pandemic. The recovery rates θ, γ, the natural and virus-induced death rates µ, δ, the threshold value of the force of infection λ0, the pathogen concentration in the environment K and the virus decay rate in the environment ψ have a negative correlation of R0 implying the virus decreases with an increase of these parameters.
The visual representation of the elasticity indices of R0 with respect to the estimated parameters of countries China, Ethiopia and Brazil cases.
In Figure (7a), we observe that for the basic reproduction number R0 < 1, all solutions curve goes to the disease-free equilibrium point. These indicate that the disease-free equilibrium point is locally and globally asymptotically stable for the values of R0 < 1. In Figure (7b) with R0 < 1 and different initial conditions for the susceptible population, all trajectory goes to the equilibrium point 
which indicates its stability.
The trajectories of state variables for R0 =0.2552, which is less than one.
In Figure (8), we observe that for the basic reproduction number R0 > 1, all solutions curves goes away from the disease-free equilibrium point. These indicate that the disease-free equilibrium point is unstable for the values of R0 > 1, and the solutions will go to the endemic equilibrium point.
Trajectories of state variables for R0 =8.3636, which is greater than one.
4.4 Predictions
One of the most important applications of the dynamical system is to predict the future spread of the disease in the population. Here we predicted the number of active infections, recoveries and deaths for the countries Ethiopia, Brazil and South Africa for the next 45 days. In Figure 9, the fitted areas are similar to the Figures (3-5) while the predicted areas show the possible values of cases (active, recovered and death) up to September 30, 2020.
Predictions of active cases, recovered cases and Death Ethiopia, Brazil and South Africa on September 15, 2020.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we have proposed and described a Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered-Death model with the addition of environmental infection with the virus for the transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic. We show the validity of the model by proving the existence, positivity and boundedness of the solutions. We then calibrated our mathematical model with a data-driven analysis, with the data coming from epidemiological results of WHO situation reports from 1 − 192. We programmed, simulated, and fitted the model with the observed data using Matlab. The estimation technique we use and the simulated results show a promising result.
For the disease-free equilibrium point, both the local and global stability analysis are proved and the result shows that the DFE is locally as well as globally asymptotically stable if R0 < 1 and unstable if R0 > 1.
The parameters are estimated using the combination of least square and Bayesian estimation techniques. According to our estimation, the model parameters vary from country to country as the case of the spread of virus varies accordingly. The sensitivity analysis on the countries show the infection rates β1 (human to human) and β2 (from the infected surfaces or environment) have high positive impacts for the spread of COVID-19. The threshold value of the force of infection for a population λ0, the recovery rates θ, γ and the virus decay rate in the environment ψ have a negative impact on the spread of the virus. We have also observed that high numbers of people with knowledge about the virus, that are practicing the prescribed self-protective measures can slow down the outbreak.
It is recommended for individuals to increase their behaviors about the pandemic by following WHO recommendations such as using a face mask, practicing social distancing to decrease human to human transmission of the virus and washing their hands and infected surfaces with soap and alcohol-based sanitizer; which can decrease the transmission of the virus from the environment to humans and from infected individuals to the environment. It is also important to create awareness, disseminate information and change behavior of individuals to keep themselves which can reduce the pandemic threshold of the infections.
Data Availability
The data in this study are available online on worldometer and WHO websites.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus and https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports
References
