Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians

View ORCID ProfileHamidullah Binol, M. Khalid Khan Niazi, Garth Essig, Jay Shah, Jameson K. Mattingly, Michael S. Harris, Charles Elmaraghy, Theodoros Teknos, Nazhat Taj-Schaal, Lianbo Yu, Metin N. Gurcan, Aaron C. Moberly
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176131
Hamidullah Binol
1Center for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hamidullah Binol
  • For correspondence: hbinol@wakehealth.edu
M. Khalid Khan Niazi
1Center for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garth Essig
2Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay Shah
3Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jameson K. Mattingly
2Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Harris
4Otolaryngology and Comm. Sciences - Froedtert Hospital, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Elmaraghy
2Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theodoros Teknos
5University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nazhat Taj-Schaal
6Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lianbo Yu
7Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Metin N. Gurcan
1Center for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron C. Moberly
2Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University, OH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video.

Methods Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image.

Results There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate.

Conclusion Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training.

Level of Evidence Level 3

Competing Interest Statement

Authors ACM, GE, and CE are shareholders in Otologic Technologies. Authors ACM and MNG are paid consultants and serve on the Board of Directors for Otologic Technologies.

Clinical Trial

No clinical trials and interventional study.

Funding Statement

The project described was supported in part by Award R21 DC016972 (PIs: Gurcan, Moberly) from National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders or the National Institutes of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Ohio State University (OSU) prior to beginning the study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: The project described was supported in part by Award R21 DC016972 (PIs: Gurcan, Moberly) from National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders or the National Institutes of Health.

  • Conflicts of interest: Authors ACM, GE, and CE are shareholders in Otologic Technologies. Authors ACM and MNG are paid consultants and serve on the Board of Directors for Otologic Technologies.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, HB, upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 21, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians
Hamidullah Binol, M. Khalid Khan Niazi, Garth Essig, Jay Shah, Jameson K. Mattingly, Michael S. Harris, Charles Elmaraghy, Theodoros Teknos, Nazhat Taj-Schaal, Lianbo Yu, Metin N. Gurcan, Aaron C. Moberly
medRxiv 2020.08.17.20176131; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176131
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians
Hamidullah Binol, M. Khalid Khan Niazi, Garth Essig, Jay Shah, Jameson K. Mattingly, Michael S. Harris, Charles Elmaraghy, Theodoros Teknos, Nazhat Taj-Schaal, Lianbo Yu, Metin N. Gurcan, Aaron C. Moberly
medRxiv 2020.08.17.20176131; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176131

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Otolaryngology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1093)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (195)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (499)
  • Epidemiology (9758)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2304)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1554)
  • Health Policy (732)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (602)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (501)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11634)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (616)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2140)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (335)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1172)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (145)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (309)
  • Pediatrics (694)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (265)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2173)
  • Public and Global Health (4648)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (455)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)