ABSTRACT
Background Mutations in UGT1A gene have been associated with the development and prognosis of urinary bladder cancer (UBC). UGT1A proteins are involved in a spectrum of detoxification processes, hence the biological mechanism between UGT1A and UBC is difficult to elucidate. Concurrently, mild hyperbilirubinemia, caused by alterations in UGT1A, has been associated with multiple health outcomes. We have investigated the potential effect of mild hyperbilirubinemia on UBC risk and prognosis, using a Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach in the UK Biobank.
Methods Data on 1,281 UBC patients and 4,071 controls was available for a two-stage least squares MR estimation with rs6742078 as an instrumental variable. First, linear regression was fitted to establish the relationship between the rs6742078 and bilirubin levels (total and unconjugated). Secondly, bilirubin values were used to predict tested outcomes under a logistic model. Both stages were adjusted for participant sex, smoking status, and age.
Results MR analysis showed no significant effects of bilirubin levels on UBC risk (total bilirubin: OR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.04; unconjugated bilirubin: OR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05). No effects were observed for events of UBC recurrence, progression, or survival.
Conclusion Our study suggests mild hyperbilirubinemia is not associated with urinary bladder cancer risk and prognosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding to declare.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. or comparable ethical standards. Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
UK Biobank data are available through a procedure described at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/.
