Abstract
Introduction Ophthalmic ultrasound (USG) produces real time high resolution images of the eye and orbit. It can categorize and predict the location of pathology in the posterior chamber of eye very well. It is useful even in pre-operative evaluation and diagnosing posterior segment eye disorders. However, the diagnostic accuracy has usually not being studied thoroughly, with special emphasis to its probability of predicting posterior-segment eye disorders using B-scan USG.
Objectives To find out the prevalence and pattern of posterior segment disorders using B-scan ultrasonography, and to find its diagnostic accuracy.
Materials and Methods The study was prospective in nature and conducted in the department of radiodiagnosis and ophthalmology of a tertiary care center of Eastern India. Patients referred to the radiology department for ruling out intra-ocular pathology using B-scan ophthalmic ultrasound were included in the study, irrespective of any age and gender. Data were captured on an excel sheet and analyzed using Stata 12.1 SE.
Results The mean age of 84 study participants was 37.4 ± 19.5 years, with maximum in between 40-50 years. Males were more (72.6%). 50% presented with low vision, and most commonly associated with cataract (45%). Prevalence of posterior segment eye disorders was 13.1%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100%. Post-test probability was 95.5%. Accuracy was however very less (39.3%).
Conclusion Using B-scan ultrasonography for pre-operative assessment and confirmation of diagnosis increases the probability of detecting presence or absence of posterior segment pathology. Absence of posterior segment disorder using this is also very helpful in ruling out disease entirely. It also a very high sensitivity and hence can be used even in rural health centers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research was not funded in any form partly or fully by any individual or organization.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IEC, VSS Medical College and Hospital, Burla
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
IEC committee name was entered wrong. Name of second author was all in Upper Case in the MedRxiv online site. No change in manuscript file was made.
Data Availability
Data is available with the authors and can be provided on request.
