Abstract
Background: Cognitive decline remains highly underdiagnosed in the community despite extensive efforts to find novel biomarkers to detect it. Finding objective screening tools for cognitive decline may improve early diagnosis of Alzheimer′s disease (AD) in the community. EEG biomarkers based on machine learning (ML) may offer a noninvasive low-coast approach for identifying cognitive decline with clinically useful accuracy. However, most of the studies use multi-electrode systems which are not vastly accessible. This study aims to evaluate the ability to extract cognitive decline biomarkers using a wearable single-channel EEG system with a short interactive cognitive assessment tool. Methods: Seniors in different clinical stages of cognitive decline (healthy to mild dementia, n=60) and young healthy participants (n=22) performed a cognitive assessment which included auditory detection and resting state tasks, while being recorded with a single-channel EEG (Aurora by Neurosteer®). Seniors′ MMSE scores were obtained by clinicians and used in allocating the groups (Healthy: MMSE>28; MCI-R: 28>MMSE>24; and MD: MMSE<24). Data analysis included standard frequency bands as well as three novel biomarkers, A0, ST4 and VC9, previously extracted from a different dataset to minimize overfitting risks. Results: Correlation between MMSE scores and reaction times was significant, validating the cognitive assessment tool. Individual MMSE scores correlated significantly with two of the EEG biomarkers: A0 and ST4. Furthermore, A0 and ST4 showed significant separation between groups of seniors with high vs. low MMSE scores, as well as the healthy young group. ST4 separated between the healthy groups (young and seniors) and the low MMSE (MD) group. Conversely, A0 differentiated between the healthy young group and all three groups of seniors. In the healthy young group, activity of Theta band and VC9 biomarker significantly increased with higher cognitive load, with both separating between the high cognitive load task and resting state. Furthermore, VC9 showed a finer separation between high and low cognitive load levels within the cognitive task. This was not shown in the senior groups, suggesting VC9 may be indicative to cognitive decline in the senior population. Conclusions: These results introduce novel biomarkers which potentially detect cognitive decline, obtained by a wearable single-channel EEG with a short interactive cognitive assessment. Such objective screening tools can be used on a large scale to detect cognitive decline and potentially allow early diagnosis of AD in every clinic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04386902
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this study. The equipment was provided by Neurosteer Inc. as part of the trial.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee (EC) of Dorot Geriatric Medical Center.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions (containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants).
