Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers (CEDiD) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational trial

Alexander Zargaran, Dina Radenkovic, Chelsea Trengrove, Gill Arbane, Kariem El-Boghdadly, View ORCID ProfileRocio Martinez-Nunez, Anne Greenough
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20172502
Alexander Zargaran
1Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dina Radenkovic
1Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Dina.radenkovic@gmail.com
Chelsea Trengrove
2Empatica S.R.L. Via Stendhal 36, 20144 Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gill Arbane
1Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kariem El-Boghdadly
1Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rocio Martinez-Nunez
3Department of Infectious Diseases, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 1UL
4The Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rocio Martinez-Nunez
Anne Greenough
4The Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London, UK
5Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
6NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused worldwide disruption with its exponential spread mandating national and international lockdown measures. Hospital-associated transmission has been identified as a major factor in the perpetuation of COVID-19, with healthcare workers at high-risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and representing important vectors for spread, but not routinely having their clinical observations monitored or being tested for COVID-19.

Methods A single-center, prospective observational study of 60 healthcare workers will explore how many healthcare workers in high-risk areas develop COVID-19 infection over a thirty day period. High-risk areas are defined as COVID positive wards, the intensive care unit or the accident and emergency department. Healthcare workers (HCWs) will be recruited and have daily self-administered nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. They will also be provided with a wearable medical device to measure their clinical observations during non-working hours, and be asked to complete a daily self-reported symptom questionnaire over the study period. Statistical analysis will assess the proportion of healthcare workers who develop COVID-19 infection as a primary objective, with secondary objectives exploring what symptoms are developed, time-to-event, and deviations in clinical observations.

Discussion At present clinical observations, symptoms and COVID-19 PCR swabs are not routinely undertaken for healthcare workers. If the CEDiD (COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers) study is successful, it will provide useful information for workforce decisions in reducing hospital-associated transmission of COVID-19. The data will help in determining whether there are early warning signs for development of COVID-19 infections amongst healthcare workers and may contribute to the evidence base advocating for more regular testing of healthcare workers’ observations, symptoms and COVID-19 status.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04363489. Registered on 27th July 2020

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT04363489

Funding Statement

Funding: The study will receive funding from Empatica to conduct the clinical trial

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical Approval: The study received HRA and IRAS approval on 16/07/2020 (IRAS Project ID 283321) (REC Reference: 20/NW/0314)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Available upon reasonable request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers (CEDiD) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers (CEDiD) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational trial
Alexander Zargaran, Dina Radenkovic, Chelsea Trengrove, Gill Arbane, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Rocio Martinez-Nunez, Anne Greenough
medRxiv 2020.08.11.20172502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20172502
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers (CEDiD) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational trial
Alexander Zargaran, Dina Radenkovic, Chelsea Trengrove, Gill Arbane, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Rocio Martinez-Nunez, Anne Greenough
medRxiv 2020.08.11.20172502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20172502

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (161)
  • Allergy and Immunology (414)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (858)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (248)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (394)
  • Epidemiology (8561)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (383)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1749)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (372)
  • Health Informatics (1242)
  • Health Policy (620)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (372)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10299)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (211)
  • Neurology (1677)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (251)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (326)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (928)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (102)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (113)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (253)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (252)
  • Primary Care Research (208)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1768)
  • Public and Global Health (3837)
  • Radiology and Imaging (623)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (320)
  • Respiratory Medicine (520)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (167)
  • Sports Medicine (158)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)