Gender as a Social Determinant of Menstrual Health: A Mixed Methods Study Among Indian Adolescent Girls and Boys

Background

Indian girls and boys face several sexual and reproductive vulnerabilities that can harm their health during the transformative yet turbulent period of adolescence when their gender identities are still being shaped. While Indian girls showed a greater prevalence of genital infections and lower awareness regarding HIV/AIDS as compared to boys/young men (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro international, 2007); a smaller proportion of boys than girls knew that a woman can get pregnant at first sex (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Population Council, 2010).Additionally, our finding corroborates the NFHS-4 finding that girls’ constrained mobility and decision-making affects their healthcare seeking ability (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro international, 2007; National Family Health Survey-4, 2017).

The resulting inequalities highlighted, frequently by sex-disaggregated datasets, are informative to policy-makers, yet incomplete unless gender itself is recognised as a social factor contributing to these inequalities. For instance, the observed differences could be wrongly interpreted as solely rooted in sex-linked biology (Dube, 1988; Gender and Health Group, 1999; Krieger, 2003; Morgan et al., 2016; Nowatzki & Grant, 2011). Moreover, to dig deeper into why certain social experiences, and opportunities, differ systematically for girls and boys, it is essential to understand the intersection of the processes driving gender inequalities with other socioeconomic inequalities (Hankivsky, 2012; Lorber & Moore, 2002). In the patriarchal Indian society, such interlinks create structural inequalities where girls and boys have unequal access to resources, and unequal norms hamper girls’ ability to question the gendered nature of their body and self (Dube, 1988; Thapan, 2001). Studies from Odisha show that girls face sanitation insecurity because physiological processes such as their menstruation and urination are governed by these intersecting inequalities (Caruso et al., 2017; Sahoo et al., 2015). For instance, socioeconomic inequalities were found to intersect with gender inequalities as women from lower socioeconomic strata could not find a private space to change their menstrual cloth or felt apprehensive as they faced drunken men while they walked to remote places to relieve themselves. Additionally, many Indian girls face menstrual taboos and strict norms within households and in the community; remain deprived of hygienic facilities at home and in public; and therefore, menstruation becomes a burden for girls (a Dasgupta & Sarkar, 2008; Kotecha et al., 2009; Narayan et al., 2001; P. Sharma et al., 2008; Singh, 2006). For instance, a study found that about 85% of school-going girls from West Bengal (n=160) faced menstruation-related restrictions (A. Dasgupta & Sarkar, 2008); about 75% of girls from Haryana (n=582) could not afford sanitary napkins ((V. Sharma et al., 2013); about one in four Indian girls miss at least a day in school during menstruation (van Eijk et al., 2016) and 43.46% older adolescent girls from Sikkim (n=1031) reported menstrual illness (Mishra & Mukhopadhyay, 2012).On the other hand, to our knowledge, except for a few qualitative studies, Indian boys are largely excluded from menstrual health research, furthering the understanding that menstruation is a “women’s topic “and missing avenues for including boys who not just play a role in health but in several facets of girls’ and women’s lives throughout the life-course (S.E. Mahon et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2013). A concern is that not recognizing menstruation as a gendered social experience that is potentially embodied by girls in the form of menstrual illnesses risks perpetuating gender inequalities in health.

Therefore, we investigate (Figure 1.1): (i) In what ways does gender determine adolescents’ menstruation-related knowledge, experiences and beliefs; (ii) whether girls’ social experience of menstruation is gendered and varies across social domains; (iii) whether a gendered experience of menstruation impacts girls’ menstruation-related beliefs and health.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.1: Conceptual Model for this chapter

Theoretical Frameworks

In addition to applying a broader lens of social construction of gender and the social determinants of health framework, we attempt at unravelling the minute ways in which adolescents learn and make sense of menstruation. To understand how menstruation is a gendered experience and how it impacts health, we used a gender analysis framework (Figure 1.2) that was put together by referring to: (i) the gender analysis toolkit for health systems (Jhpiego, 2016) and, (ii) the guidelines for analysing gender and health (Gender and Health Group, 1999).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.2: Gender Analysis Framework

The theory of social construction of gender helped to understand the minute ways in which adolescent girls and boys, make sense of menstruation and its gendered nature (Fingerson, 2006; Tolman et al., 2003). To further study how it becomes a subject of concealment, we treated gender as a process by its ability to be produced and reproduced through everyday social engagements with its ability to order social life by creating subtle hierarchies (Fingerson, 2006; Lorber, 1994; Lorber & Moore, 2002; West & Zimmerman, 1987). This helped us theorize how gender through its micro-interactional and macro-institutional ways makes menstruation a discriminatory experience for girls and an exclusionary experience for boys (Ridgeway, 2009).

By using a gender analysis framework, we attempt to study how a gendered construction of menstruation operates and affects adolescent health (Nowatzki & Grant, 2011; Tolman et al., 2003). This framework helps examine gender power relations and its impact on menstruation-related health outcomes by questioning how gender-specific social roles, and society’s preferential inclusion and exclusion of a particular gender in the allocation of menstruation-related information and resources, influence adolescents’ social construction of menstruation in a step-by-step manner in the research process. We use gender-differences in menstruation-related outcomes as a trigger and question their unjustness (Gender and Health Group, 1999; Tolman et al., 2003).

Methods Study site

Our research was carried out in the north-west part of Maharashtra state in India in Nashik district, with a contrasting characteristic of having a high Human Development Index (0.746) and some of the poorest inlands in the state (Jayachandran, 2014). The district has one of the largest tribal populations in the state with substantial socioeconomic heterogeneity (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), 2014; International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF, 2017; Nashik District Collectorate, 2017).

Study design

In this sequential mixed-methods study, we used a combination of an exploratory as well as explanatory approaches (Byrne, 2009). In the first phase, we conducted semi-structured interviews (adolescents aged 13-19 years and key-respondents) and focus group discussions (henceforth, FGDs) (separately for girls and boys). The emerged themes and observations from the qualitative data guided the survey questionnaire. A school-based cross-sectional survey using a sequential mixed methods design (Qual→ Quant→ qual), as described by Creswell et al. (2013), was carried out to capture the gender differences in menstruation- related outcomes, gendered experience and its impact on health among girls. A short post- survey qualitative phase was carried out to receive feedback on our survey findings. We integrated the quantitative and qualitative results to mix at the interpretation stage. This helped to bring forth the intricacies and patterns in the data as the complementary attributes of both the quantitative and qualitative (singular) methods were used (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006).

Survey questionnaire formation

A field-test for the survey question-bank was carried out among 35 boys and girls. The questionnaire was modified according to the feedback received and was translated into Marathi; back-translated into English and was checked for content validity by experts.

Survey

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the IIT Gandhinagar Institutional Ethics Committee prior to the study. School authorities were approached in advance to discuss survey objectives and detailed procedure. Prior verbal consent was obtained from parents/guardians by the school representatives, as suggested by the school authorities. After obtaining the consent, we were invited by the school authorities to collect the data. Participants were told the aim and the voluntary nature of participation. Verbal consent from students’ parents/guardians was requested to be acquired by the school representatives. Adolescents’ verbal consent/ assent (depending upon their age) was sought prior to their participation in the qualitative interviews/FGDs or survey. They could choose either English or Marathi survey form.

They were informed that they could ask any queries at any point and that they can ask us to stop the audio taping if they wished to speak off-the-record. They were also told that they could withdraw from the study at any point without any consequences. The anonymity of the survey and the confidentiality of the data was maintained throughout the study. More details are found in other paper (Gundi & Subramanyam, 2019).

Analysis

Results

Quantitative phase

Below is a gender distribution of adolescents with adequate knowledge, favorable beliefs, receiving information in school, and opining favourably to ‘whether boys should know’ (Table 1.1).

Below are gender differences - for possessing adequate and accurate knowledge (n=677 girls and 703 boys), favorable beliefs (n=574 girls and 684 boys), receiving information on menstruation in school (n=673 girls and 732 boys) and opining favourably to ‘whether boys should know about menstruation’ (n=660 girls and 727 boys) (Figure 1.3)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.3: Gender gap in menstruation-related outcomes

Notably, about 95% of the girls (n=443) reported at least one gendered social experience of menstruation. (Figure 1.4)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.4: Percentage of girls reporting at least one gendered social experience of menstruation

Gender as a social determinant of menstruation-related outcomes among girls and boys (Table 1.2):

In fully adjusted models, fewer boys than girls possessed knowledge [IRR at 95% CI: 0.34 (0.24, 0.47)]. Although fewer boys than girls had received information in school [IRR at 95% CI: 0.34 (0.24, 0.49)], more boys (than girls) opined that boys should know about menstruation [IRR at 95% CI: 1.25 (1.00, 1.58)].

Influence of gendered experience of menstruation on health-related outcomes (Table 1.3):

A gendered experience of menstruation versus a lack of it was negatively associated with positive beliefs [IRR: 0.39 (0.16, 0.93)] and with good menstrual health status [IRR: 0.22 (0.05, 0.90)], in fully adjusted models.

Qualitative Phase 2

Key respondents agreed with our study findings and suggested looking deeper into the social patterning of gender inequalities and its influences on menstruation-related experiences. Our interviews underscored the scope of capturing more shades of girls’ gendered experience of menstruation to understand how it impacts their lives. For instance, a 17-year-old unmarried girl from the tribal setting shared that

“Our male teacher locks the toilet of the school and keeps the key with him.. he denies us access to toilet saying that we make it dirty…”. A similar experience was shared by another 19-year-old girl from tribal setting who said that menstruating girls were not allowed to use the hostel toilets for changing their absorbents. She added,

“Sometimes we used to climb up a hillock just to relieve ourselves or to change the absorbents.”

All the married (for not more than three months) girls from tribal area whom we interviewed were unsure regarding whether their husbands knew about menstruation. None of them had tried to bring this topic up and had only shared their date for periods with their mother-in-law. The already gendered experience of menstruation that girls face within households seemed to become more stressful as girls got married and moved to their in-laws’ households. A 19-year-old married girl from tribal setting shared,

“Here everything is new… I will have to tell my mother-in-law when I get my periods as she will tell me what to do… here the house is new for me. I don’t know, where to wash my menstrual cloth, where to dry it so that no one sees it. One day I will have to talk to my husband about it because you know…. Married men should know about it…. if the man wants to do something (sexual intercourse), he will still do it even if his wife is menstruating”

Marital status of the adolescent girls also seemed to contribute to the gendered perception of the self and the body among the tribal poor. Although in the pre-survey qualitative phase, we did not come across any girl (all unmarried) mentioning pubic hair removal as the essential step in menstrual hygiene, married girls from the post-survey phase did mention it as a necessary step. At least one married tribal girl confirmed buying a hair removal crème every month for ‘cleaning’ the area, though it was economically taxing. She said she “had to somehow manage money to buy one.”

We shared that the teasing experience narrated by several menstruating girls was mostly denied by boys, as reflected in our results based on both the qualitative and the quantitative pieces. Girl participants in the post-qualitative phase reiterated that the teasing experience was indeed common and affected several girls emotionally. A girl participant from tribal area narrated incident when they witnessed their friend crying as she was teased (laughter upon seeing a stain). A married tribal girl shared a teasing incident faced by her school-friend and wondered whether boys tease because they don’t know that menstrual blood flow is not a bodily fluid that can be controlled by the body (such as urinary control). She wondered whether they laugh because they think that it is girls’ immaturity to have a stain as she “suddenly loses control over her body (sphincters).”

The social worker supported our findings regarding gender being a social determinant of menstruation-related experience. He explained,

“It [being a boy] makes society adamant about what he can participate in. Being a woman is at least beneficial in the sense that women come together and discuss about menstruation. I find it extremely challenging to gather boys from disadvantaged backgrounds for sex education as their coming together is always politicized. Family resists if we try to get them out of the rigid cage of masculinity.. In this community we also see a close link between menstruation and domestic violence.”

Key informants also pointed out that one needs to examine the complexity in the relationship amongst caste, class, and menstrual experience. The sex-education expert cautioned that while tribal societies are considered egalitarian, one needs to find out if menstruation-related negative beliefs are due to infrequent water supply, a lack of privacy, or other such constraints, rather than social reasons. The social worker explained that class and wealth may not show an incremental relationship with menstruation-related outcomes because stereotypes regarding gender, caste, class, and honour intersect in complex ways.Parents’ lack of consent for inclusion of their school-dropout sons in our interviews also hinted at greater barriers to healthy SRH faced by school-dropout boys.

Discussion

We found that gender influences adolescents’ menstruation-related experiences, understanding, and beliefs. It unpacks the various layers explaining how menstruation becomes a gendered experience in different social domains for girls and influences their health. The quantitative findings highlight the gender differences in knowledge, beliefs, receipt of information in schools and also in opinion on ‘whether boys should know about menstruation’. Further, the quantitative strand unearthed how gendered experience of menstruation influenced menstrual health-related outcomes.

Thus, our analysis added textured explanations to support the previous findings suggesting that gender is an important determinant of sexual and reproductive health among adolescents; operating through unjust roles, norms, and expectations.

The gender analysis framework guided us in disentangling the complex ways in which being a boy/girl influences menstrual health-related experiences: by (i) governing adolescents’ access to information, ability to possess knowledge, and ability to possess beliefs, (ii) creating gender roles, expectations, and by sustaining stigma, (iii) by negatively impacting ‘girls’ menstrual beliefs and health outcomes.

Our finding that being a boy (than a girl) likely meant not receiving information in schools and not possessing adequate and accurate knowledge, corroborates the findings of previous studies on Indian adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Additionally, the finding that boys were curious to learn about reproductive health (a greater proportion of boys versus girls opined that boys should know about menstruation) was similar to previous studies on Indian boys (S. E. Mahon et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2013). Notably, girls expressed a fear of getting teased by boys if boys got to know about menstruation. Our pre- survey as well as the post-survey qualitative phase reflected that teasing faced by girls could have several layers to it as it could emerge from boys’ awkwardness, their increased sense of differences between a male and a female body, as well as their unawareness regarding the nuanced aspects of menstruation (for instance, that menstrual blood flow cannot be ‘controlled’ by a woman’s body). Our study brings forth that gender inequality was produced and sustained as menstruation was viewed as a biosocial marker to differentiate what girls and boys can/ not do, an important finding corroborating previous research on adolescents (T. Mahon & Fernandes, 2010; Pradhan & Ram, 2010; Santhya & Jejeebhoy, 2014). This analysis also shows that girls felt awkward to interact with-and hid their menstrual status and absorbents from-men, which also echoes the finding by scholars who argue that by concealing their menstrual status, girls learn to un-gender their sexual maturity, while also subscribing to the societal expectations of the gendered power relations that generate stigma for their bodily processes and subordination to men (Caruso et al., 2017; Dube, 1988; Fingerson, 2006; Luke, 1997). Our post-survey qualitative phase unpacked how marital status added more burden to girls’ already gendered menstrual experience as they struggled to fit in with the normative ideas of cleanliness and menstrual hygiene management (for instance, by using hair removal cream for removing their pubic hair), while remaining clueless about how to discuss menstruation with their husbands. The influence of the political economy of the hygiene industry on the ideas of cleanliness was reflected in our data as girls’ perceptions regarding their own body and bodily processes seemed to get affected by the created notions of hygiene (Lahiri-Dutt, 2014).

Our qualitative data also corroborated the multi-dimensional nature of the gendered experience, influenced by different axes of determinants fluidly intersecting in a given situation (Sen & Iyer, 2012). Girls’ ability to push the boundaries in avoiding a gendered experience of menstruation within their communities could be limited due to several social and familial inequalities intersecting with gender inequality. For instance, residing or passing through a neighbourhood perceived as unsafe may limit a menstruating girl’s ability to freely talk to boys. Research on sanitation insecurity in India has revealed that girls from the tribal setting often feel insecure using sanitation facilities outside of homes or to defecate in the open as that increases their risk of interactions with intoxicated men (Caruso et al., 2017; Sahoo et al., 2015). Although tribal societies are largely viewed as egalitarian in nature, it has been found that girls and women find it difficult to transfer any egalitarian views on SRH from one social institution to the other due to the difference in the nature of the gender-related power dynamic across social institutions that lessens their scope to bargain with patriarchal discriminatory practices (Caruso et al., 2017; Maharatna, 2000; Richards et al., 2013). Also, girls and women not speaking to men in the open is often normalized and an attempt to break this norm is found to be challenging by most girls and women, especially from the disadvantaged backgrounds (Scott et al., 2017). A study from North India which tested the participatory approach of Village Health, Sanitation, and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) to challenge the gendered social experience faced by women members of the committees, found it to be effective only among the few women who could push the strict gender boundaries (Scott et al., 2017). This was primarily associated with women’s realization of their limited ability to bargain with the patriarchy as they had to return to their homes where gender power relations were likely less negotiable. Such dynamics may have influenced even adolescent girls’ experiences due to- or post- menarche.

Moreover, the process by which gender might intersect with caste and class is not one-dimensional. Scholarship on intersectionality indicates that lower class, caste, and gender might intersect to give rise to higher morbidities among women belonging to poor SES (Scott et al., 2017). On the other hand, literature also suggests that an intersection of higher class and patriarchy might limit a woman’s ability to seek autonomy and agency; as such a woman’s seclusion is largely associated with the honour of the family. These dimensions are perhaps reflected as girls from an urban setting going to private schools whose mothers are moderately educated facing gendered experience of menstruation, and also those belonging to a reserved caste category or the fact that girls in urban private schools whose mothers are moderately educated and belong to open category reported feeling ashamed to buy sanitary napkins from a male shopkeeper.

This suggests that at both the higher and the lower levels of class and caste, women seem to be less valued. While the minute processes through which this complex dynamic becomes a social experience may differ in different social environments, we could find a glimpse of this complexity in our data.

An essential part of the intersectional nature of social identities was showcased by our qualitative data shedding light on the several ways through which being a boy also invited gendered experiences: boys remained deprived of information regarding menstruation and their curiosity remained unaddressed. Thus, a gendered experience is not restricted to girls but boys, too, were adversely affected in several ways by the gendered nature of menstruation-communication. Intersectionality scholars highlight that gender and health is not necessarily about women and women’s health (Hankivsky, 2012).

Underscoring the gendered nature of menstruation, this article shows that the discrimination that girls face affects their menstrual beliefs and health. Our findings shed light on a few mechanisms explaining how gender inequality affects women’s health, links also discussed by several scholars in the past (Chandra-Mouli et al., 2013; Krieger, 2003; Moss, 2002; Sanneving et al., 2013; Tolman et al., 2003). A study from Pondicherry (n=800) showcased how a ‘traditionality index,’ indicating gendered beliefs regarding menstruation, was higher among rural and poor girls and a greater proportion (36%) of ‘very traditional’ girls reported white discharge during menstruation as compared to ‘very modern’ (18.1%) (Narayan et al., 2001). This closely reflects our findings that the experience of gendered menstruation reduces the chance of possessing good menstrual health. However, in this chapter we add further layers as we look at (i) the heterogeneity in gender-based discrimination in different social environments and across socioeconomic settings; (ii) the influence of school-level social determinants in addition to parental socioeconomic characteristics; (iii) the impact of gendered menstruation on possessing positive beliefs; and, (iv) menstrual health status as a measure reflecting many aspects of menstrual health than only white discharge.

Our ability to generalize the findings to a wider population is limited because we used a non-probabilistic sampling design and could not include school drop-outs and adolescents less than 12 years old. However, our sample was adequate to detect socioeconomic patterns in the gendered experience of menstruation, a unique contribution in the Indian context. The cross-sectional nature of this study limits our ability to study the causal pathways. However, as a first attempt at unpacking how gender is a social determinant of menstrual health, this study still adds value. Our integrated theoretical approach does not capture the psychological and developmental aspects of adolescents’ experiences regarding menstruation; however, it does justice to the application of a social epidemiological lens. Knowledge, beliefs, and gendered menstruation index variables were calculated by an additive method, which might not represent the complexities of these constructs. Additionally, variables for parental socioeconomic characteristics were reported by adolescents who might have failed to give adequate and accurate information (10% of wealth data were missing). Our inability to cross- check this information by referring to school-records remains a limitation. Furthermore, when compared with a data representative of Nashik district, our sample lack a representation of the poorest two categories of household wealth because we used a school-based survey which excluded poor adolescents who are most likely school drop-outs. This potentially is a reason for the inconsistent and weak findings pertaining to parents’ socioeconomic characteristics and wealth. Our sample size also prevented us from performing subgroup analyses examining how gender and social inequalities interact. Additionally, due to limited resources, we were unable to gather data on objectively assessed menstrual health. Despite these limitations, we could highlight how gender is a social determinant of menstrual health, how various social factors (mother’s education, setting, wealth) create patterns in the menstrual experience of girls in different social environments (family, school, community) and how this gendered experience affects girls’ health outcomes (beliefs and menstrual health status).

To our knowledge, this is the first mixed-methods study using a gender-sensitive methodology and an integrated theoretical approach that draws attention to how gender and social inequalities intersect to impact girls ‘and boys’ understanding, beliefs and experiences regarding menstruation, a unique social epidemiological approach that questions treating menstruation as a ‘women’s only’ topic. By using a mixed-methods design, we could unearth context-specific nuances of the gendered social experience of menstruation while quantifying the social patterning in this gendered experience and its influence on girls’ menstrual health. The mixing enabled a coherent interpretation of these nuances and patterns. Our finding that the gendered experience of menstruation differs in different social domains highlights how gender permeates structural spaces and environments and acts as an “organizing principle of social life” (Gita et al., 2002; Sims & Butter, 2002).

Conclusion

Our study showcases how menstrual health, which is largely considered a ‘women’s’ topic, reflects unjust gender and socioeconomic differences in the accessibility of information for both boys and girls at a stage in their lives when they learn to conform to expectations.These unjust differences rooted in the gender inequalities perpetuated in patriarchal societies such as India govern girls’ menstruation by treating it as a shameful experience.

Thus, by recognizing the role of boys and men in creating and sustaining taboos around menstruation, this study underscores the need to engage them in creating menstruation-friendly societies. Although programs exist which target narrowing gender- based discrimination and gender gaps in health, several programs focus on developing skillsets among women, improving their access to financial resources but fewer programs aiming to reduce gender disparities reach marginalized adolescent girls and boys who have specific needs. Although India’s national-level program for adolescents, the Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram, recommends involving boys in the discussion on menstruation, it is not based on evidence regarding the similarities and differences in girls’ and boys’ menstruation-related understanding (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2017). It is only by recognizing adolescents’ needs specific to their gender and socio-demographic characteristics that patriarchal societies such as India can aim to develop gender-sensitive menstrual health strategies for Indian adolescents.