Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Newborn Life Support Course: Does it make me more confident when resuscitating a newborn?

View ORCID ProfileLaurent Renesme, Maria Merched, Olivier Tandonnet, Julien Naud
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20114637
Laurent Renesme
1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurent Renesme
  • For correspondence: Laurent.renesme@gmail.com
Maria Merched
2INSERM, CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Tandonnet
1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julien Naud
3Paediatric Transport Team, SMUR Bordeaux, University Hospital of Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To describe the effectiveness of the Neonatal Life Support (NLS) course in terms of attendees’ knowledge, perceived self-efficacy, and clinical applicability.

Methods We conducted an electronic survey of NLS course attendees (NLS+ group). The survey had six themes: i) demographic characteristics; ii) NLS clinical applicability; iii) attendee’s perceived proficiency at neonatal resuscitation; iv) attendee’s perceived experience of fluency, security, and quality of care during neonatal resuscitation; v) knowledge (multiple-choice questions); and vi) perceived personal and professional impact of the NLS course. A control group (NLS−) was recruited via our regional perinatal network. The survey data were analysed anonymously. Multiple linear regression analysis examined the following: NLS course, job tenure, maternity level, and profession.

Results The survey completion rate was 62% (200/323) for the NLS+ group. Among participants, 84% had participated in neonatal resuscitation since their course. The scores for positive perceived experience for neonatal resuscitation (fluency, security, and quality of care delivered) were higher in the NLS+ group than the NLS− group (p < 0.006). After adjustment, the independent factors associated with a higher positive perceived experience were the NLS course, work in tertiary level maternity ward, and job tenure > 5 years. The multiple-choice questions score (n = 10) was 8.2 ± 1.3 (NLS+) vs. 6.7 ± 1.5 (NLS−) (p < 0.0001). NLS course, medical degree, and work in a tertiary level maternity ward were independently associated with higher knowledge scores.

Conclusion The NLS course was associated with better knowledge of, and a positive perceived experience regarding, neonatal resuscitation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding received for this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB was not required for our study. We conducted an anonymous self-assessment survey.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data from this study are not available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 10, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Newborn Life Support Course: Does it make me more confident when resuscitating a newborn?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Newborn Life Support Course: Does it make me more confident when resuscitating a newborn?
Laurent Renesme, Maria Merched, Olivier Tandonnet, Julien Naud
medRxiv 2020.08.04.20114637; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20114637
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Newborn Life Support Course: Does it make me more confident when resuscitating a newborn?
Laurent Renesme, Maria Merched, Olivier Tandonnet, Julien Naud
medRxiv 2020.08.04.20114637; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20114637

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Pediatrics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (557)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1769)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (316)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (662)
  • Epidemiology (10812)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (594)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2960)
  • Geriatric Medicine (288)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1933)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (293)
  • HIV/AIDS (633)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12525)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (696)
  • Medical Education (300)
  • Medical Ethics (87)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2808)
  • Nursing (152)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1473)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (868)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (367)
  • Primary Care Research (338)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2646)
  • Public and Global Health (5383)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1016)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (597)
  • Respiratory Medicine (727)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (290)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (126)