Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Using social contact data to predict and compare the impact of social distancing policies with implications for school re-opening

View ORCID ProfileEllen Brooks-Pollock, View ORCID ProfileJonathan M. Read, Angela McLean, View ORCID ProfileMatt J. Keeling, View ORCID ProfileLeon Danon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20156471
Ellen Brooks-Pollock
1Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, BS40 5DU
2NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ellen Brooks-Pollock
  • For correspondence: ellen.brooks.pollock@gmail.com
Jonathan M. Read
3Lancaster Medical School, University of Lancaster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan M. Read
Angela McLean
4Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, OX1 3SZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt J. Keeling
5,6Mathematics Institute and School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matt J. Keeling
Leon Danon
2NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BY
7CEMPS, University of Exeter
8The Alan Turing Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leon Danon
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Social distancing measures, including school closures, are being used to control SARS-CoV-2 transmission in many countries. Once “lockdown” has driven incidence to low levels, selected activities are being permitted. Re-opening schools is a priority because of the welfare and educational impact of closures on children. However, the impact of school re-opening needs to be considered within the context of other measures.

Methods We use social contact data from the UK to predict the impact of social distancing policies on the reproduction number. We calibrate our tool to the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK using publicly available death data and Google Community Mobility Reports. We focus on the impact of re-opening schools against a back-drop of wider social distancing easing.

Results We demonstrate that pre-collected social contact data, combined with incidence data and Google Community Mobility Reports, is able to provide a time-varying estimate of the reproduction number (R). From an pre-control setting when R=2.7 (95%CI 2.5, 2.9), we estimate that the minimum reproduction number that can be achieved in the UK without limiting household contacts is 0.45 (95%CI: 0.41 − 0.50); in the absence of other changes, preventing leisure contacts has a smaller impact (R = 2.0, 95%CI: 1.8 − 2.4) than preventing work contacts (R = 1.5, 95%CI: 1.4 − 1.7). We find that following lockdown (when R=0.7 (95% CI 0.6, 0.8)), opening primary schools in isolation has a modest impact on transmission R = 0.83 (95%CI: 0.77 − 0.90) but that high adherence to other measures is needed. Opening secondary schools as well as primary school is predicted to have a larger overall impact (R = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.85 − 1.07), however transmission could still be controlled with effective contact tracing.

Conclusions Our findings suggest that primary school children can return to school without compromising transmission, however other measures, such as social distancing and contract tracing, are required to control transmission if all age groups are to return to school. Our tool provides a mapping from policies to the reproduction number and can be used by policymakers to compare the impact of social-easing measures, dissect mitigation strategies and support careful localized control strategies.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors gratefully acknowledge comments and discussions from the members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M) for useful comments and discussions. Funding: EBP is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Evaluation of Interventions at the University of Bristol, MJK is supported by NIHR grant MEMVIEER NIHR200411, LD is supported by The Alan Turing Institute EPSRC EP/N510129/1, and MRC grant MC/PC/19067.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used for the paper are publicly available.

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/54273/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 27, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using social contact data to predict and compare the impact of social distancing policies with implications for school re-opening
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Using social contact data to predict and compare the impact of social distancing policies with implications for school re-opening
Ellen Brooks-Pollock, Jonathan M. Read, Angela McLean, Matt J. Keeling, Leon Danon
medRxiv 2020.07.25.20156471; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20156471
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Using social contact data to predict and compare the impact of social distancing policies with implications for school re-opening
Ellen Brooks-Pollock, Jonathan M. Read, Angela McLean, Matt J. Keeling, Leon Danon
medRxiv 2020.07.25.20156471; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20156471

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (579)
  • Anesthesia (139)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1947)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (252)
  • Dermatology (184)
  • Emergency Medicine (333)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (699)
  • Epidemiology (11102)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (624)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3168)
  • Geriatric Medicine (308)
  • Health Economics (561)
  • Health Informatics (2042)
  • Health Policy (863)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (782)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (682)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12720)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (707)
  • Medical Education (317)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (334)
  • Neurology (2986)
  • Nursing (164)
  • Nutrition (463)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1552)
  • Ophthalmology (477)
  • Orthopedics (185)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (912)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (381)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2785)
  • Public and Global Health (5591)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1094)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (635)
  • Respiratory Medicine (760)
  • Rheumatology (338)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (311)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (343)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (132)