Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study

View ORCID ProfileRishi K. Gupta, View ORCID ProfileMichael Marks, Thomas H. A. Samuels, Akish Luintel, Tommy Rampling, Humayra Chowdhury, Matteo Quartagno, Arjun Nair, Marc Lipman, Ibrahim Abubakar, Maarten van Smeden, Wai Keong Wong, Bryan Williams, Mahdad Noursadeghi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.24.20149815
Rishi K. Gupta
1Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rishi K. Gupta
Michael Marks
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
3Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Marks
Thomas H. A. Samuels
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akish Luintel
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tommy Rampling
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Humayra Chowdhury
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Quartagno
4MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arjun Nair
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Lipman
5UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibrahim Abubakar
1Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maarten van Smeden
6Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wai Keong Wong
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan Williams
7NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
8University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahdad Noursadeghi
2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
9Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.noursadeghi@ucl.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The number of proposed prognostic models for COVID-19, which aim to predict disease outcomes, is growing rapidly. It is not known whether any are suitable for widespread clinical implementation. We addressed this question by independent and systematic evaluation of their performance among hospitalised COVID-19 cases.

Methods We conducted an observational cohort study to assess candidate prognostic models, identified through a living systematic review. We included consecutive adults admitted to a secondary care hospital with PCR-confirmed or clinically diagnosed community-acquired COVID-19 (1st February to 30th April 2020). We reconstructed candidate models as per their original descriptions and evaluated performance for their original intended outcomes (clinical deterioration or mortality) and time horizons. We assessed discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calibration using calibration plots, slopes and calibration-in-the-large. We calculated net benefit compared to the default strategies of treating all and no patients, and against the most discriminating predictor in univariable analyses, based on a limited subset of a priori candidates.

Results We tested 22 candidate prognostic models among a cohort of 411 participants, of whom 180 (43.8%) and 115 (28.0%) met the endpoints of clinical deterioration and mortality, respectively. The highest AUROCs were achieved by the NEWS2 score for prediction of deterioration over 24 hours (0.78; 95% CI 0.73-0.83), and a novel model for prediction of deterioration <14 days from admission (0.78; 0.74-0.82). Calibration appeared generally poor for models that used probability outcomes. In univariable analyses, admission oxygen saturation on room air was the strongest predictor of in-hospital deterioration (AUROC 0.76; 0.71-0.81), while age was the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.76; 0.71-0.81). No prognostic model demonstrated consistently higher net benefit than using the most discriminating univariable predictors to stratify treatment, across a range of threshold probabilities.

Conclusions Oxygen saturation on room air and patient age are strong predictors of deterioration and mortality among hospitalised adults with COVID-19, respectively. None of the prognostic models evaluated offer incremental value for patient stratification to these univariable predictors.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: non-financial support from AIDENCE BV (Dr Nair), outside the submitted work; no support from any organisation outside those declared above for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by National Institute for Health Research (DRF-2018-11-ST2-004 to RKG; NF-SI-0616-10037 to IA), the Wellcome Trust (207511/Z/17/Z to MN) and has been supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, in particular by the NIHR UCLH/UCL BRC Clinical and Research Informatics Unit. This paper presents independent research supported by the NIHR. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funder had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (REF: 20/EM/0114).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The conditions of regulatory approvals for the present study preclude open access data sharing to minimise risk of patient identification through granular individual health record data. The authors will consider specific requests for data sharing as part of academic collaborations subject to ethical approval and data transfer agreements in accordance with GDPR regulations.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 26, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study
Rishi K. Gupta, Michael Marks, Thomas H. A. Samuels, Akish Luintel, Tommy Rampling, Humayra Chowdhury, Matteo Quartagno, Arjun Nair, Marc Lipman, Ibrahim Abubakar, Maarten van Smeden, Wai Keong Wong, Bryan Williams, Mahdad Noursadeghi
medRxiv 2020.07.24.20149815; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.24.20149815
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study
Rishi K. Gupta, Michael Marks, Thomas H. A. Samuels, Akish Luintel, Tommy Rampling, Humayra Chowdhury, Matteo Quartagno, Arjun Nair, Marc Lipman, Ibrahim Abubakar, Maarten van Smeden, Wai Keong Wong, Bryan Williams, Mahdad Noursadeghi
medRxiv 2020.07.24.20149815; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.24.20149815

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (158)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5270)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (196)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (700)
  • Health Policy (360)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (164)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5889)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (767)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (131)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (143)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (480)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (98)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (864)
  • Public and Global Health (2023)
  • Radiology and Imaging (349)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)