Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A machine learning aided global diagnostic and comparative tool to assess effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 spread

View ORCID ProfileRaj Dandekar, Chris Rackauckas, George Barbastathis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160697
Raj Dandekar
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raj Dandekar
Chris Rackauckas
2Department of Applied Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Barbastathis
3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) Centre, Singapore 138602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gbarb@mit.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1 SUMMARY

We have developed a globally applicable diagnostic Covid-19 model by augmenting the classical SIR epidemiological model with a neural network module. Our model does not rely upon previous epidemics like SARS/MERS and all parameters are optimized via machine learning algorithms employed on publicly available Covid-19 data. The model decomposes the contributions to the infection timeseries to analyze and compare the role of quarantine control policies employed in highly affected regions of Europe, North America, South America and Asia in controlling the spread of the virus. For all continents considered, our results show a generally strong correlation between strengthening of the quarantine controls as learnt by the model and actions taken by the regions’ respective governments. Finally, we have hosted our quarantine diagnosis results for the top 70 affected countries worldwide, on a public platform, which can be used for informed decision making by public health officials and researchers alike.

Article Summary Line Data-driven epidemiological model to quantify and compare quarantine control policies in controlling COVID-19 spread in Europe, North America, South America and Asia.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This effort was partially funded by the Intelligence Advanced Reseach Projects Activity (IARPA.)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Research was in the field of data analysis/machine learning and was conduced with publicly available Covid-19 data; in affiliation with MIT.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data for the infected and recovered case count in all regions was obtained from the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. All code files are available at https://github.com/RajDandekar/MIT-Global-COVID-Modelling-Project-1. All results are publicly hosted at https://covid19ml.org/ or https://rajdandekar.github.io/COVID-QuarantineStrength/.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 24, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A machine learning aided global diagnostic and comparative tool to assess effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 spread
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A machine learning aided global diagnostic and comparative tool to assess effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 spread
Raj Dandekar, Chris Rackauckas, George Barbastathis
medRxiv 2020.07.23.20160697; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160697
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A machine learning aided global diagnostic and comparative tool to assess effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 spread
Raj Dandekar, Chris Rackauckas, George Barbastathis
medRxiv 2020.07.23.20160697; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1749)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (654)
  • Epidemiology (10785)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (584)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2935)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1919)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12501)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (685)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (323)
  • Neurology (2786)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1458)
  • Ophthalmology (441)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
  • Primary Care Research (334)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2633)
  • Public and Global Health (5342)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1004)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (724)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)