Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

“The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back”: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews

Anna Mae Scott, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Barnett, Alexandre Stephens, Simon E. Kolstoe, Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533
Anna Mae Scott
1Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ascott@bond.edu.au
Iain Chalmers
2Oxford University (retired) and James Lind Library, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrian Barnett
3Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandre Stephens
4Northern NSW Local Health District & The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon E. Kolstoe
5University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Clark
1Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Glasziou
1Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article usage

Article usage: July 2020 to January 2021

AbstractFullPdf
Jul 2020257056
Aug 2020115053
Sep 20201450267
Oct 202090067
Nov 20201713774
Dec 20205379852
Jan 2021375630
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 12, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back”: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
“The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back”: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
Anna Mae Scott, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Barnett, Alexandre Stephens, Simon E. Kolstoe, Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou
medRxiv 2020.07.22.20159533; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
“The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back”: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
Anna Mae Scott, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Barnett, Alexandre Stephens, Simon E. Kolstoe, Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou
medRxiv 2020.07.22.20159533; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Ethics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (408)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (67)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4816)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (177)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (671)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (187)
  • Health Informatics (621)
  • Health Policy (314)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (200)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5282)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (326)
  • Medical Education (91)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (73)
  • Neurology (677)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (112)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (124)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (438)
  • Ophthalmology (138)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (88)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (128)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (129)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (769)
  • Public and Global Health (1800)
  • Radiology and Imaging (321)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (61)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)