The Neurological Symptoms of ‘Long’ COVID-19: A Comparison with other Neurological Conditions and Implications for Healthcare Services

T Wildwing, N Holt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.21.20158816

Abstract

Objective In response to the rapid spread of COVID-19, this paper provides health professionals with better accessibility to available evidence, summarising findings from a systematic overview of systematic reviews of the neurological symptoms seen in patients with COVID-19. Implications of so-called ‘Long Covid’ on neurological services and primary care and similarities with other neurological disorders are discussed.

Methods Firstly, a systematic overview of current reviews of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 was conducted. Secondly the implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the potential effect on neurological services and the similarities in the experience of patients with COVID-19 and those with other neurological disorders.

Results Twenty-nine systematic reviews were identified within seven databases, published between 11th April 2020 and 27th August 2020. The results indicated (so far), that COVID-19 exhibits two types of neurological symptoms; life threatening symptoms such as Guillain Barre Syndrome and encephalitis, and less devastating symptoms such as fatigue and myalgia. These so-called lesser symptoms appear to be emerging as longer-term for some sufferers and have been recently labelled Long Covid. When compared, these Long Covid symptoms are very similar to other neurological conditions such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and Functional Neurological Disorder (FND).

Conclusions Implications for neurological healthcare services in the UK may include longer waiting times and a need for more resources (including more qualified health professionals). There is also a possible change-effect on health professionals’ perceptions of other neurological conditions such as CFS and FND. Future research is recommended to explore changes in health professionals’ perceptions of neurological symptoms because of COVID-19.

Introduction

As of 15th September 2020, almost thirty million people worldwide have been affected by the novel coronavirus COVID-19.1 It has been found to cause neurological manifestations in up to 50% of patients.2 Several systematic reviews have been conducted into the neurological symptoms of COVID-19. However, some reviews focused purely on specific types of symptoms such as olfactory symptoms, whilst others focused on studies only in specific countries, for example at least a quarter of the studies within the reviews were undertaken in China. It was therefore deemed necessary firstly, to conduct a systematic overview of previously conducted systematic reviews to summarise the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 seen so far.

Secondly, it is becoming clear that COVID-19 affects many patients neurologically, and in some cases, symptoms are persisting. A recent BMJ webinar discussed the emergence of so-called ‘Long Covid’.3,4 This paper further discusses the concerns about the short and long-term effects of COVID-19 on medical and holistic neurological practice and where future resources will be required.

Thirdly, as COVID-19 is a new disease, the potential similarities with other neurological conditions have not yet been explored in the literature. The authors of this paper identified that many of the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 appear similar to the symptoms of FND. In addition, the BMJ webinar and recent articles4 5 discussed the similarities between so-called ‘Long Covid’ and CFS, as it has become increasingly noticeable that symptoms are similar. Whilst FND is generally regarded as a psychological disorder, the authors of this paper argue that the emerging discussions about supporting patients with ‘Long Covid’6,7 should relate to other neurological disorders such as FND and CFS, questioning how these conditions are judged and how treatments are resourced for them as well as for ‘Long Covid’.

Neurological services in the UK offer diagnosis and treatment to patients with disorders of the nervous system.8 This research is therefore aimed at health professionals and commissioners in the field of neurology and in primary care in the UK. It aims to inform future service provision for those who develop long-term neurological symptoms due to COVID-19; as well as exploring the effect of COVID-19 on health professionals’ perceptions towards those with symptoms of FND.

Methods

A systematic overview of current systematic reviews was conducted to explore the potential impact of the longer-term neurological symptoms of COVID-19. The review protocol was not previously registered. The implications of the findings of this overview were discussed, including potential effects on neurological and primary care services and on perceptions towards patients with other neurological disorders such as CFS and FND.

To conduct the systematic overview of systematic reviews, the recommendations outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were followed (Supplementary Material 1).9 Following these recommendations reduces the risk of bias or selective reporting and demonstrates transparency in the process conducted. The following databases were searched between December 2019 and June 2020: ‘PubMed Central’, ‘Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,’ ‘Ovid’ ‘ScienceDirect’ ‘Biomed Central’ ‘BMJ’ and SAGE Journals. The following keywords within the title or abstract were used to conduct each search: ‘coronavirus’, ‘COVID-19’, ‘SARS-COV-2’, ‘neurological’, ‘nervous’ and ‘review’. For example, PubMed Central was searched using the following search terms: (((COVID-19 OR SARS-COV-2 OR coronavirus[Title]) OR (COVID-19 OR SARS-COV-2 OR coronavirus[Abstract])) AND ((neuro* OR nervous[Title]) OR (neuro* OR nervous[Abstract])) AND ((review[Title] OR (review[Abstract]))). Limitations: Date: 01/12/2019-01/09/2020. Only articles published in academic journals in English were retrieved. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also searched to ensure literature saturation.

The inclusion criteria consisted of systematic reviews only relating to neurological symptoms seen in patients with COVID-19 since 1st December 2019. Both authors participated through each step of the review independently (screening, eligibility and inclusion). Reviews were screened for relevancy against the inclusion criteria within title and abstract. Full-text reports for all potentially relevant reviews were obtained, including those where there was any uncertainty. The authors screened the full-text reports for relevancy and resolved any disagreement through discussions. Neither of the authors were blind to the journal titles, the authors’ of the reviews or institutions. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for systematic reviews (2018) was used to establish the quality of each review included within this systematic overview.10 All included reviews were deemed high quality; 23 reviews met nine of the ten CASP criteria, five reviews met eight of the criteria and one review met seven of the criteria. All reviews were read in full by both authors. Microsoft Excel was used to compile a list of all the included reviews and the neurological symptoms mentioned in each. This list was completed and checked by both authors.

Next, neurological symptoms of COVID-19, CFS and FND were placed into a table to compare the symptoms, which led to a consideration of the implications for neurological healthcare services and primary care in the UK, and to the possible change-effect on perceptions towards CFS and FND.

Results

A systematic overview of systematic reviews of neurological symptoms of COVID-19

PRISMA guidelines were followed for the search strategy of the systematic overview as seen in Figure 1. The database search identified 438 papers, with a further 13 papers identified within the reference lists of the included reviews. From a total of 451 papers, 381 were excluded after title and abstract review for relevance. The remaining 56 papers were reviewed in full. 27 of these were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria (date, study design or methodology). 29 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria and were included in this overview 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.

The 29 systematic reviews were published between 11th April 2020 and 27th August 2020. The characteristics of the reviews can be seen in Table 1; the number of relevant studies reviewed within each review, the number of participants in each relevant study and the aims of each study. As mentioned, the CASP checklist was utilised to check for risk of bias in each review.

View this table:
Table 1:

Characteristics of the reviews

As can be seen in Table 1, some of the reviews explored issues outside the scope of this review. Within scope of this review, 417studies relating to neurological symptoms of COVID-19 were reviewed within the 29 reviews. Most of the reviews included the same studies. For instance, Mao et al. (2020) was included in 21 reviews.40 Whilst numbers of participants were not always stated, at least 43,166 participants were included across the 417 studies reviewed.

Table 2 shows the country where each reviewed study took place. As can be seen, a quarter of the studies took place in China (107 studies with a total of 17,855 participants). Italy, South Korea, Spain, the UK and the USA researched more than 2000 participants in each country. This gives an overview of the countries in which neurological symptoms of COVID-19 are under investigation, although it was not determined whether all participants were within the country stated. There may also be publication bias as this review excluded reviews that were not in English.

View this table:
Table 2:

Countries where studies took place

Throughout the 417 studies, 22 neurological symptoms were described. These are summarised in Table 3. As can be seen, neurological manifestations of COVID-19 include catastrophic symptoms such as cardio-vascular disease (CVD), encephalitis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome, which are understandably hugely concerning and have therefore generated intense discussion and research. COVID-19 has also been found to cause symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, ataxia, dysphagia and headache, which though more benign, can be disabling if they become chronic.

View this table:
Table 3:

Neurological symptoms of COVID-19

A comparison between the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 and the most common symptoms of FND and CFS

The most common symptoms experienced by people with FND and those with CFS are compared with the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 in Table 4. The symptoms of FND and of CFS were collated from key NHS sources and DSM-5. 41,42,43,44 Neurological symptoms of COVID-19 include catastrophic symptoms requiring emergency care such as stroke, brain haemorrhage, encephalitis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. However, 15 other neurological symptoms were shown to be similar in COVID-19 and FND and/or CFS (shaded in grey within Table 4). In fact, every non-catastrophic symptom of COVID-19, including the much-researched symptom of hyposmia, is also described as a symptom of FND and/or CFS. Furthermore, most of the symptoms of FND and CFS, have been experienced by some people with COVID-19 neurological symptoms, particularly those with Long Covid.

View this table:
Table 4:

Comparison between neurological symptoms in COVID-19, FND and CFS

Discussion

From these results, this paper argues three main points: 1) COVID-19 appears to be becoming chronic for some patients, presenting similar neurological symptoms to FND and to CFS; 2) the long-term neurological effects of COVID-19 may impact neurological and wider health care services; 3) the neurological symptoms seen in COVID-19 may (and should) affect health professionals’ perceptions of FND and CFS.

1) Long Covid, FND and CFS present similar neurological symptoms

Long Covid, FND and CFS present similar neurological symptoms; every non-catastrophic symptom of COVID-19 (except for hypogeusia) is described as a symptom of FND and/or CFS. In addition, every symptom of FND (except bladder and bowel issues), and of CFS, (except flu symptoms and heart palpitations) have been experienced by some people with COVID-19. Notably, the main symptoms of Long Covid are increasingly similar to symptoms of CFS (fatigue, inability to concentrate, myalgia, headache). 3

2) The impact of these findings on neurological healthcare services and primary care

Echoing concerns raised recently by the British Medical Association,7 the findings of this review highlight the impact that short and long-term neurological symptoms of COVID-19 may have on current health services. Symptoms seen in Long Covid such as facial pain, muscle issues, neuralgia, fatigue and insomnia, may become long term and disabling, requiring sustained support from healthcare services such as pain, fatigue and sleep clinics, neurological services and primary care. This is supported by other research which suggests rehabilitation required by patients following COVID-19 infection may be ‘very much along the same lines as existing services but with double the demand’.45 Consultant-led neurological services such as chronic fatigue clinics and headache clinics are already overstretched with a shortage of neurology consultants and long waiting lists.46 Neurological symptoms of Long Covid may increase demand for these clinics and may indicate a need for more qualified health professionals and specialists in neurology. The effects of COVID-19 on these services is hard to predict, as the neuropathy, myopathy and sensory deficits of SARS resolved within three months of recovery.32 However, as COVID-19 appears to be becoming Long Covid for up to 10% of patients,3 support is likely to be required, potentially for a significant number of people, if their symptoms do not resolve spontaneously.

Additionally, COVID-19 is causing a wider impact on patient populations. For example, COVID-19 has affected delivery of health care services, through reduction in use of emergency services during the peak of the pandemic in the UK as patients were worried about contracting the virus from hospitals.47 There is evidence that some patients with long term conditions have improved their self-care techniques, such as better use of medication and alternative therapies such as physiotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise. On the other hand, most outpatient appointments and elective surgeries were postponed, leading in some cases to deaths as an indirect result of COVID-19. 48 There are now questions about whether there will be a rebound in demand, potentially overwhelming NHS services, or whether the reduction in demand can be sustained. Combined with the previously mentioned potential increase in demand for neurological services, there is likely to be wide reaching financial implications. This research is therefore useful for aiding future patient management while helping to develop policies for response to COVID-19 and its critical outcomes.

3) The effect of COVID-19 on perceptions of FND and CFS

Key sources differ in their description of FND symptoms, indicating that there is no comprehensive list of all FND symptoms. 41,42,43,44 It is likely that this contributes to health professionals’ uncertainty in diagnosing FND.49 In addition, patients with both FND and CFS have experienced many years of scepticism from health professionals5 with negative consequences, including lack of support and poor access to services often contributing to poor mental health. 50 In addition, lower value is given to health professionals’ role in managing poorly defined symptoms.51 FND and CFS, alongside other ambiguous uncertain conditions (e.g. fibromyalgia), are considered amongst the lowest conditions on the hierarchy of importance of conditions.52

Conversely, COVID-19 can be quickly and easily diagnosed with a test (leaving aside the possibilities of false results). The authors of this research are concerned that within neurological services, priority may be given to patients who have had COVID-19, who may actually experience some level of prestige because they have survived a disease feared by all, and any neurological symptoms they experience might be automatically accepted, extensively researched and supported, at detriment to other neurological conditions. There is already evidence of this skewing of services, as large sums of money and research at pace are contributing to a greater understanding of long-term symptoms of COVID-19,53 and the NHS has declared its intention to provide a COVID-19 rehabilitation service.13 Also, there is indication that the presence of Long Covid is unquestionably ‘believed’ by health professionals, as doctors and other professionals have written about their experiences with it5 and are recommending each other’s papers.3

However, some patients with emerging Long Covid have similar experiences to those with less accepted conditions, particularly those who were unable to get a test early in the pandemic54. Patients feel doctors dismiss their symptoms, they feel desperate, and disagree with diagnoses of anxiety. As Garner (2020) explained, “Doctors need to stop diagnosing this as anxiety. We have messed up before, lets’ not do it again with long term covid-19 illness.”5

It is important to highlight the similarities between symptoms of Long Covid and other conditions, providing education for health professionals, informing future practice and illustrating the need for more funding for neurological services to meet increased demand. Whilst research and services for COVID-19 are gaining funding, there is a lack of funding and research into understanding, treatment and support for those who suffer from FND and CFS.55 FND and CFS are likely to have lower prestige than COVID-19, however the realisation that COVID-19 causes neurological symptoms similar to FND and CFS may lead to a potential shift in perceptions towards these conditions. They may be taken more seriously, and more funding may be made available for appropriate neurological services unrelated to the cause of the symptoms.

Limitations

Scientific reports centred on neurological effects of COVID-19 are still scarce, and risk of publication bias is high. For example, within the reviews included in this research, a quarter of the studies were undertaken in China (107) and a further quarter in Europe (99). Only two studies were conducted in the African continent and none were conducted in the South American continent. Despite the status of COVID-19 as a pandemic, research into the neurological effects of COVID-19 so far has not been conducted worldwide.

This systematic review is grounding its results on previous reviews’ findings; thus, it is difficult to assess how reliable some of these results can be, for example many of the reviews (67) did not state the source of their findings. Quality assessment has however been undertaken as described earlier and the reviews deemed high quality. Retrospective and prospective studies of larger cohorts are necessary to correctly assess nervous system involvement, which has not been possible yet for COVID-19 as it is a very new disease and it is unclear how much it mimics other coronaviruses.

Conclusion and implications for future research

There is an array of evidence to show that COVID-19 causes neurological symptoms, and although it is difficult to ascertain how long-term the symptoms may become, there is increasing evidence of the presence of Long Covid, symptoms persisting beyond three months. Although this paper is primarily UK focused, these concerns are likely to be similar in other countries. This research collates the evidence so far and provides insight into the neurological effects of COVID-19 in relation to FND symptoms. Concerns about the potential impact of these findings on the delivery of neurological and wider healthcare services are considered alongside the potential effect COVID-19 may have on perceptions of neurological symptoms, particularly those relating to FND and CFS. Further research is recommended to explore whether the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 will improve acceptance and understanding of FND or whether this will worsen the experience for those who suffer from FND. Further thought for future planning of health care resources also needs to be taken into consideration, in light of this pandemic.

Funding and conflict of interests

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

All references referred to in the manuscript are published journal articles or accessible webpages.

Appendices

Footnotes

  • Updated systematic review completed; Tables 1-4 revised; Discussion section rewritten to include recent CFS discussions

References

  1. ↵
    John Hopkins University & Medicine: Coronavirus Resource Centre. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  2. ↵
    Stevens R. How does Coronavirus Affect the Brain? https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/how-does-coronavirus-affect-the-brain (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  3. ↵
    Greenhalgh T, Knight M, A’Court C. et al. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ 2020; 370: m3026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3026 (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Nabavi N. Long covid: How to define it and how to manage it. BMJ 2020; 370: m3489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3489 (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Garner P. Covid-19 at 14 weeks—phantom speed cameras, unknown limits, and harsh penalties. BMJ. 2020 https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/06/23/paul-garner-covid-19-at-14-weeks-phantom-speed-cameras-unknown-limits-and-harsh-penalties/ (accessed 13 September 2020).
  6. ↵
    Mahase E. Covid-19: What do we know about “long covid”? BMJ. 370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2815 (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  7. ↵
    Rimmer, A. Covid-19: Impact of long-term symptoms will be profound, warns BMA. BMJ. 370:m3218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3218 (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Guys and St Thomas National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust. Neurological Services. https://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/our-services/neurology/overview (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  9. ↵
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009;151: 264–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for systematic reviews. https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Systematic-Review-Checklist2018.pdf (2018, accessed 10 July 2020).
  11. Abdullahi A, Candan S, Abba M, et al. Neurological and Musculoskeletal Features of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 687. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00687. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. Abu-Rumeileh S, Abdelhak A, Foschi M, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome spectrum associated with COVID-19: an up-to-date systematic review of 73 cases. Neurol. Epub ahead of print 25 Aug 2020. 1–38. doi:10.1007/s00415-020-10124-x. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Agyeman A. Smell and Taste Dysfunction in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. In press, journal pre-proof. 2020; 95(8): 1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.030 (2020, accessed 15 June 2020).
    OpenUrl
  14. Almqvist J, Granberg T, Tzortzakakis A, et al. Neurological manifestations of coronavirus infections - a systematic review. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. Epub ahead of print 27 August 2020. doi:10.1002/acn3.51166. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. Asadi-Pooya A. & Simani L. (2020). Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020; 413(11):116832. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.116832 (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. Ceravolo MG, Arienti C, De Sire A, et al. Rehabilitation and Covid-19: the Cochrane Rehabilitation 2020 rapid living systematic review. International Multi-professional Steering Committee of Cochrane Rehabilitation REH-COVER action. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. Epub ahead of print 24 July 2020. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06501-6. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. Collantes MEV, Espiritu AI, Sy MCC, et al. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. Epub ahead of print 15 Jul 2020:1-26. doi:10.1017/cjn.2020.146. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. Correia A, Feitosa P, de Sousa Moreira J, et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronaviruses: a systematic review. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research. 2020; 37: 27–32. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  19. Di Carlo DT, Montemurro N, Petrella G, et al. Exploring the clinical association between neurological symptoms and COVID-19 pandemic outbreak: a systematic review of current literature. J Neurol. Epub ahead of print 1 Aug 2020; 1–9. doi:10.1007/s00415-020-09978-y. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. Dinakaran, D., Manjunatha, N., Kumar, C., and Suresh, B. Neuropsychiatric aspects of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Selective Review. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020; 53: 102188. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  21. Ghannam M, Alshaer Q, Al-Chalabi M, et al. Neurological involvement of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review. J Neurol. Epub ahead of print 19 Jun 2020; 1–19. doi:10.1007/s00415-020-09990-2. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. Katal S, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Neuroimaging and neurologic findings in COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review in 116 patients. Neuroradiol. Epub ahead of print 27 June 2020. S0150-9861(20)30204-2. doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2020.06.007. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. Leonardi M, Padovani A & McArthur J. Neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19: a review and a call for action. Journal of Neurology. 2020; 20: 1. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  24. Montalvan V, Lee J, Bueso T et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2020; 1(194): 105921. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  25. Nepal G, Rehrig JH, Shrestha GS et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 421. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03121-z. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. Pinzon R, Wijaya V, Buana R. Neurologic Characteristics in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 565. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00565. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. Rogers J, Chesney E, Oliver D. et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; May 18. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  28. Scoppettuolo P, Borrelli S. & Naeije G. Neurological involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a clinical systematic review. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health. 2020; 6: 100094. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  29. Sharifian-Dorchea M, Huota P, Osherova M, Wen D. Neurological complications of coronavirus infection; a comparative review and lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020; 417: 117085 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117085 (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. Taherifard E. Neurological complications of COVID-19: a systematic review. Neurol Res. Epub ahead of print 2020; 23: 1–8. doi:10.1080/01616412.2020.1796405. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. Tan Y, Goh C, Leow A, et al. COVID-19 and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-summary of the literature. J Thromb Thrombolysis. Epub ahead of print Jul 2020; 13: 1–9. doi:10.1007/s11239-020-02228-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    Tsai, S., Lu M., San, S. & Tsai, C. The Neurologic Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systemic Review. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020; 19(11): 498 (2020). (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  33. Tsivgoulis G, Palaiodimou L, Katsanos A, et al. Neurological manifestations and implications of COVID-1 9 pandemic. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders. 2020; 13: 1756286420932036. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrl
  34. Uncini A, Vallat J, Jacobs B. Guillain-Barré syndrome in SARS-CoV-2 infection: an instant systematic review of the first six months of pandemic. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print. 27 Aug 2020. jnnp-2020-324491. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-324491. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. Vonck K, Garrez I, De Herdt V, et al. Neurological manifestations and neuro-invasive mechanisms of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2. European Journal of Neurology. 2020; May 16. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  36. Wang L, Shen Y, Li M, et al. Clinical manifestations and evidence of neurological involvement in 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. Epub ahead of print 2020; Jun 11: 1-13. doi:10.1007/s00415-020-09974-2. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. Werner C., Scullen T, Mathkour M, et al. Neurological impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): practical considerations for the neuroscience community. World Neurosurgery. 2020 May 6. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  38. Whittaker, A., Anson, M. & Harky A. (2020). Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: A review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2020 May 15. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  39. Wilson, M. & Jack, A. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in neurology and neurosurgery: A scoping review of the early literature. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. Apr 23:105866. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  40. ↵
    Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. (2020) e201127. 10.1001/jamaneurol.1127 (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  41. ↵
    Patient Info. Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) https://patient.info/brain-nerves/functional-neurological-disorder (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  42. ↵
    National Health Service (NHS) Medically Unexplained Symptoms https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/medically-unexplained-symptoms/ (2020, accessed 13 September, 2020).
  43. ↵
    Neurosymptoms.org (Edinburgh University). Functional Neurological Disorder: a patient’s guide. https://www.neurosymptoms.org/ (2020, accessed 13 September 2020).
  44. ↵
    Black D, Grant J. DSM-5® Guidebook: The Essential Companion to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 2014, p.201–215. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  45. ↵
    Thornton J. Covid-19: the challenge of patient rehabilitation after intensive care. BMJ. 2020; 369: m1787 doi:10.1136/bmj.m1787. (2020, accessed 12 September 2020).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    National Health Service (NHS) England. Learning from the Elective Care Development Collaborative: Transforming elective care services neurology. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/neurology-elective-care-handbook.pdf (2019, accessed 1 June 2020).
  47. ↵
    The Kings Fund. Restarting health and care services will take months. www.kingsfund.org.uk/press/press-releases/restarting-health-and-care-services-will-take-many-months (2020, accessed 1 June 2020).
  48. ↵
    Vaughan L. Where are the patients? The factors affecting the use of emergency care during COVID-19. Nuffield Trust. www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/where-are-the-patients-the-factors-affecting-the-use-of-emergency-care-during-covid-19 (2020, accessed 5 July 2020).
  49. ↵
    Canna, M. & Seligman, R. Dealing with the unknown. Functional neurological disorder (FND) and the conversion of cultural meaning. Social Science & Medicine. 1; 246:112725. (2020). (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    Robson, C. & Lian, O. ‘Are You Saying She’s Mentally Ill Then?’ Explaining Medically Unexplained Seizures in Clinical Encounters. In Forum Qualitative Sozial for schung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2015 Nov 29, 17, 1. (2015). (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    Marshall, M. Redefining quality: valuing the role of the GP in managing uncertainty. British Journal of General Practice. 1;66(643): e146–8. (2016). (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Album, D. & Westin, S. (Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Social Science & Medicine. 1;66(1):182–8. 2008 p.186. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). Major study into long term health effects of Covid-19 launch in the UK. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/major-study-into-long-term-health-effects-of-covid-19-launched-in-the-uk/25200 (2020, accessed 1 September 2020).
  54. ↵
    Alwen N. What exactly is mild covid-19? BMJ Opinion. 2020 https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/07/28/nisreen-a-alwan-what-exactly-is-mild-covid-19/ (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
  55. ↵
    Nitkunan A, Lawrence J, Reilly M. (2020). Neurology Workforce Survey Conducted by the Association of British Neurologists. 1-19 p.11. (2020, accessed 1 September 2020)
Back to top
Posted September 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
The Neurological Symptoms of ‘Long’ COVID-19: A Comparison with other Neurological Conditions and Implications for Healthcare Services
T Wildwing, N Holt
medRxiv 2020.07.21.20158816; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.21.20158816
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area