Community-level SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Survey in urban slum dwellers of Buenos Aires City, Argentina: a participatory research

Introduction

Population serological data are essential for understanding the prevalence of subclinical infections and the population’s herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2.[1] Several Covid-19 seroprevalence studies were carried out on general population showing, in general, low rate of antibodies.[2-5] However such evidence has been obtained from cities with different living conditions than the ones prevailing among slum dwellers of Latin American cities and can hardly be extrapolated to them. [6]

Buenos Aires City (CABA) has nearly 3 million inhabitants, of whom approximately 5.7% live within 17 neighborhoods with a very vulnerable population. In most cases, there are households with scarce water and sanitation, poor ventilation, space constraints and overcrowding making physical distancing and self-quarantine impractical, thus facilitating the rapid spread of SARS-CoV2 infection.[7][8]

Barrio Mugica is one of the most overcrowded slums with more than 40.000 inhabitants, and almost 1500 people experiencing homelessness. [9] Its first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, linked to community transmission, was reported four days after national mandatory quarantine was set on March,19^th 2020. Preventive measures were taught to community-based organizations that provided food assistance, temporary isolation centers for elderly people in churches were created and an immediate plan for emergency and health care was established in the three medical centers allocated in Barrio Mugica. In spite of these measures, in the following days this slum was the first in Argentina to become affected by a high number of cases, with a sharp rise of infected people.

On May 5th 2020, an active policy named “DETeCTAr”, was set to dampen the spread by testing, diagnosing and early treating of cases.[7] A crisis planning committee joined weekly to enforce the emergency plan actions related to health access, economic aid and food assistance. Social and health community workers were deployed in active surveillance on cases and contact tracing. Local sampling for qPCR testing was performed and each positive person, according to clinical severity, was admitted to an out-of-hospital institution (reconverted hotels) or to a hospital.

Till July 1st, Covid-19 incidence rate at Barrio Mugica was 5.9% (2949 diagnostics by qPCR) and the case fatality rate was 1.5% (44 deaths). In parallel with the mitigation measures the basic reproduction number (R0) in Barrio Mugica decreased from 3.24 to 0.6 in six weeks. In order to understand population immunity against SARS-CoV2, on June, 10th, a team participatory research, the SeroCovid-POB CABA study started, aiming to detect SARS-CoV2IgG presence and the housing conditions associated with infection. The final aim is to contribute to future decision making on epidemiological control measures.

Materials and Methods

A community-level seroprevalence survey was conducted in a cross-sectional design during a Participatory Action Research (PAR). Population of the study were inhabitants of Barrio Mugica: men and women form 14 years of age or older were included.

Starter PAR team: AG (molecular virologist that contributed to the development of the COVIDAR ELISA Test), ASM (virologist that perform the analysis of the test) and SF (physician that served as volunteer field epidemiologist at the DETeCTAr Barrio 31) offered technical cooperation to test people experiencing homelessness.

PAR-First step: A sample for convenience of 60 homeless people was tested during 3 days in the “Comedor del Fondo”, a popular dining room managed by a non-governmental organization. Samples were collected by a DETeCTAr nurse and a volunteer epidemiologist while training the HCWs. The prevalence was 36%, 22 of them were also RT-qPCR positive and accepted to be inpatient.

PAR-Second step: feasibility was determined by the DETeCTAr coordinators of the Community Health Division of the Ministry of Health and the 14 health community workers (HCWs) when two volunteer epidemiologists from a University Institute explained the field organization (sample technique, data collection and database entry) for obtaining a probabilistic sample of residents. The PAR process was a cornerstone for reaching the sample size.[10][11]

PAR-Third step: A cross-sectional study for seroprevalence survey was carried out.

Results

The study was carried out between June 10^th and June 26^th, after the curve of incident COVID-19 cases flattened (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Covid 19 Incident Cases - Barrio Mugica Buenos Aires Argentina. SeroCovid-POB study (June 10th to June 20th).

Barrio Mugica is a heterogeneous slum, in which 10 sectors can be distinguished, each presenting particular cultural and social characteristics.

A total of 398 houses were visited, in which 577 households (families) live. Out of them, 873 people accepted to be tested at their house’s doorstep (Figure 2). Median age was 38 years (IQR 28-49) and 499 (57.2%) were women. Few people (72; 16.8%) reported being symptomatic; 489 houses shared bathroom and kitchen (55.3%). Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of the sample according to Barrio Mugica’s sector.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Community Health workers at “Bajo Autopista” sector of Barrio Mugica.

The weighted SARS-CoV2 IgG seroprevalence was 53.4% (95%CI 52.8%-54.1%). Prevalence among males was 51.5% (95%CI 50.6-52.4) and for women 55.3% (95%CI 54.4-56.2). Sex and age-group specific prevalence is shown in Figure 3.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

sex and age-strata specific prevalence of positive SARS-CoV2Covid-19 IgG.

Figure shows age-strata specific prevalence by age strata in years with CI95%. Male prevalence in color blue and female prevalence in red.

We have found strong evidence of within-household clustering effect (rho=0.52; 95% IC 0.36-0.67; LRT 43.8 p-value <0.001) and also between-household clustering (sigma 1.88 95% IC 1.37-2.59). We did not find association between being symptomatic and a positive result in serological assay (OR 1.01; 95% IC 0,54-1.87).

The prevalence according to each Barrio Mugica’s sector is shown in Figure 4.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4:

Barrio Mugica Covid-19 seroprevalence by sector.

An association between being IgG positive and living with a PCR confirmed COVID-19 case was found (OR 2.13; 95% IC 1.17-3.85). Living in the “Bajo Autopista” sector of the neighborhood had the highest risk of infection. (OR 30.39 IC95% 5.50-168.0). Other variable associations are shown in Table 2.

Discussion

Data herein present the first seroprevalence evaluation in the highly vulnerable population in a large slum in Buenos Aires. This city, the capital of Argentina, is a large urban conglomerate in a country of the Southern hemisphere, in which we performed the survey at the beginning of the Winter, a short time after the flattening of the outbreak in the selected slum. The geographical location of the country allowed us to benefit from the previous experiences in the Northern hemisphere, though direct extrapolation was hindered by huge socioeconomic and cultural differences.

The high seroprevalence we found (53%) is in agreement with the recent evidence that COVID-19 has disproportionately affected marginalized populations; the UK and US are reporting higher in-hospital mortality rates for Black people and minority ethnic groups.[17][18] Our study gives an appropriate sample frame tailored to the highly uneven and inequitable distribution of COVID-19 among vulnerable populations.

Our study, a community-level seroprevalence survey, covers a smaller area than large-scale geographic surveys but selects participants in a probabilistic way allowing application to other similar populations. This study helps to understand mechanisms by which SARS-CoV2 spreads in similar low income urban communities. The COVID-19 incidence rate at Barrio Mugica, according to RT-qPCR of suspected cases, was ≥5.9%. Strikingly, we found that in these communities, for each patient diagnosed by RT-qPCR there were 9 IgG-positive individuals, suggesting an unprecedented high rate of asymptomatic infection.

Reporting bias could be present in the symptomatic rate as the survey asked for symptoms during the two previous months, when only people having fever were considered to be COVID-19 cases, thus minimal symptoms may not have been noticed. Even though case definition has changed as new evidence was discovered about the behaviour of the infection around the world, including new mild symptoms, such as lack of taste and smell, this study suggests that in order to avoid major spread of the virus PCR testing criteria should be broader.

One important concern regarding seroprevalence studies that have been previously performed is the specificity of the test used. In this case, an ELISA assay with 100% specific was employed. Regarding sensitivity, the assay showed 95% after 21 days of onset of symptoms using qPCR positive samples. In this respect, if patients included in this study were analyzed before seroconversion, the analysis would be underestimated.

The precise threshold for what percentage of the population would need to be immune against SARS-CoV-2 for herd immunity to occur is currently undefined, however assuming Fine et al (2011) projections, if the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproductive number (R0) ranges from 2 to 3.5, this threshold may range from 40% to 75% [20]. In our series, the R0 reached that threshold and the prevalence found is according to this assumption.

A caveat must be kept in mind since sex was not an statistical significant variable, male subjects between 14 and 19 years showed the highest prevalence of IgG positives compared with the other groups.

Due to the high virus transmission found in our study, we would have expected a higher lethality rate. Bonofiglio et al. have shown that in Barrio Mugica 1.5% of people are older than 65 vs 17% in the rest of Buenos Aires City, with a higher working-age population (37% vs 30%), As a working-class neighborhood it has high immigration and elders stay living in their places of origin [9]. In our study, we also found a low proportion of elderly people (4.5%), these differences with the rest of CABA and other european cities could express that, beside a high virus transmission, the lethality rate was not as high as reported in other countries. For future comparison with other countries, we also informed the standardized prevalence, applying WHO population by age and sex was 54.33 (IC95% 53.2 - 55.5).

This study shows the relevance of clustering: cluster correlation was evident among household members who share exposure to COVID-19. In this regard, those who had a family member diagnosed by PCR had two fold chance of becoming infected by the virus. We also found sector differences, those living in worse conditions (“Bajo autopista”, Figure 2) had a higher rate of infection. This could be associated with lack of water supply suffered in April which put the whole community in distressing alert.

The participatory action research process was a cornerstone for reaching the sample size number, because the “community of inquiry and action” evolved, increased and addressed questions that were significant for those who participated in the study. It is important to highlight that co-researchers directly involved in the field work, were community health workers living in the neighborhood [10]. In our research process, people experiencing homelessness were successfully first evaluated, and this encouraged the team to move forward in building capacity to carry out the SeroCovid-POB study. It was important to acknowledge that all stakeholders were part of collective learning relationships. We experienced that PAR challenges the notion that the community is a passive object of study and is devoid of knowledge.

Our study also highlights the challenges that public health officials have to face regarding populations in low-resourced settings, which have not yet been infected. We suggest that top-down strategies to mitigate an infectious disease should incorporate social groups and knowledge that already exist in many slums. Contextual conditions should be recognized in participatory encounters with all the actors working in slum space (foundations, community-based organizations, non-governmental organizations). Community health workers should be trained not only for screening and case and contact tracing but also to challenge the standard ways of treating the urban poor creating more participatory governance.

IgG response against different SARS-CoV-2 antigens becomes detectable in immunocompetent patients after at least 8 days with over 90% of individuals seropositive after day 14 of infection. In theory, seropositive individuals are expected to be at lower risk for re-infection compared to seronegative persons, however neither the level nor the duration of protective immunity against COVID-19 is currently known [17], we will consider this study as a baseline cohort for a serial seroprevalence study that could provide a better understanding of transmission patterns and may help determine when (or if) we reach a state of herd immunity.

Conclusion

We found an unexpectedly high seroprevalence in a vulnerable population. People living with a PCR confirmed COVID-19 case, increased two-fold the chance of testing IgG positive. Importantly, in this highly populated area with housing deficiencies, for each person diagnosed positive by qPCR with symptoms, 9 people were IgG positive without registering symptoms, providing evidence of high rate asymptomatic infections.

This study directly contributes to understanding population immunity and the housing conditions associated with an unprecedented viral spread, which will help future decision making and control measures.