ABSTRACT
Objective Feature engineering is a major bottleneck in phenotyping. Properly learned medical concept embeddings (MCEs) have the semantics of medical concepts, thus useful for retrieving relevant medical features in phenotyping tasks. We compared the effectiveness of MCEs learned from knowledge graphs and electronic healthcare records (EHR) data in retrieving relevant medical features for phenotyping tasks.
Materials and Methods We implemented five embedding methods including node2vec, singular value decomposition (SVD), LINE, skip-gram, and GloVe with two data sources: (1) knowledge-graphs obtained from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model; and (2) patient level data obtained from the OMOP compatible electronic health records (EHR) from Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC). We used phenotypes with their relevant concepts developed and validated by the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network to evaluate the performance of learned MCEs in retrieving phenotype-relevant concepts. Hits@k% in retrieving phenotype-relevant concepts based on a single and multiple seed concept(s) was used to evaluate MCEs.
Results Among all MCEs, MCEs learned by using node2vec with knowledge graphs showed the best performance. Of MCEs based on knowledge graphs and EHR data, MCEs learned by using node2vec with knowledge graphs and MCEs learned by using GloVe with EHR outperforms other MCEs respectively.
Conclusion Medical concept embedding enables scalable feature engineering tasks, thereby facilitating high-throughput phenotyping. Knowledge graphs constructed by hierarchical relationships among medical concepts learn more effective MCEs, highlighting the need of more sophisticated use of big data to leverage EHR for phenotyping.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Library of Medicine grants R01LM009886-11 and 1R01LM012895-03, National Human Genome Research Institute grant 2U01-HG008680-05, and National Center for Advancing Translational Science grant 1OT2TR003434-01.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study received institutional review board approval with a waiver for informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/WengLab-InformaticsResearch/mcephe
https://github.com/WengLab-InformaticsResearch/mcephe
https://github.com/WengLab-InformaticsResearch/concept-recommender