Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions

View ORCID ProfileNils Haug, View ORCID ProfileLukas Geyrhofer, View ORCID ProfileAlessandro Londei, View ORCID ProfileElma Dervic, View ORCID ProfileAmélie Desvars-Larrive, View ORCID ProfileVittorio Loreto, View ORCID ProfileBeate Pinior, View ORCID ProfileStefan Thurner, View ORCID ProfilePeter Klimek
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.06.20147199
Nils Haug
1Medical University of Vienna, Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nils Haug
Lukas Geyrhofer
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lukas Geyrhofer
Alessandro Londei
3Sony Computer Science Laboratories, 75005 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alessandro Londei
Elma Dervic
1Medical University of Vienna, Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elma Dervic
Amélie Desvars-Larrive
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
4Unit of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Institute of Food Safety, Food Technology and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amélie Desvars-Larrive
Vittorio Loreto
3Sony Computer Science Laboratories, 75005 Paris, France
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
5Physics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vittorio Loreto
Beate Pinior
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
4Unit of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Institute of Food Safety, Food Technology and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Beate Pinior
Stefan Thurner
1Medical University of Vienna, Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
6Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefan Thurner
Peter Klimek
1Medical University of Vienna, Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Klimek
  • For correspondence: peter.klimek{at}meduniwien.ac.at
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 were often implemented under considerable uncertainty and a lack of scientific evidence. Assessing the effectiveness of the individual interventions is critical to inform future preparedness response plans. Here we quantify the impact of 4,579 NPIs implemented in 76 territories on the effective reproduction number, Rt, of COVID-19. We use a hierarchically coded data set of NPIs and propose a novel modelling approach that combines four computational techniques, which together allow for a worldwide consensus rank of the NPIs based on their effectiveness in mitigating the spread of COVID-19. We show how the effectiveness of individual NPIs strongly varies across countries and world regions, and in relation to human and economic development as well as different dimensions of governance. We quantify the effectiveness of each NPI with respect to the epidemic age of its adoption, i.e., how early into the epidemics. The emerging picture is one in which no one-fits-all solution exists, and no single NPI alone can decrease Rt below one and that a combination of NPIs is necessary to curb the spread of the virus. We show that there are NPIs considerably less intrusive and costly than lockdowns that are also highly effective, such as certain risk communication strategies and voluntary measures that strengthen the healthcare system. By allowing to simulate “what-if” scenarios at the country level, our approach opens the way for planning the most likely effectiveness of future NPIs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Austrian Science Promotion Agency, FFG project under 857136, the WWTF under COV 20-001, COV 20-017 and MA16-045, the Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlichen Fonds des Buergermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien under CoVid004, and the project VET-Austria, a cooperation between the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety and the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data set on non-pharmaceutical interventions to curb the spread of COVID-19 is available online via the following repository: https://github.com/amel-github/covid19-interventionmeasures. The data on confirmed cases of COVID-19 has been taken from https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 08, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
Nils Haug, Lukas Geyrhofer, Alessandro Londei, Elma Dervic, Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Vittorio Loreto, Beate Pinior, Stefan Thurner, Peter Klimek
medRxiv 2020.07.06.20147199; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.06.20147199
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
Nils Haug, Lukas Geyrhofer, Alessandro Londei, Elma Dervic, Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Vittorio Loreto, Beate Pinior, Stefan Thurner, Peter Klimek
medRxiv 2020.07.06.20147199; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.06.20147199

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3297)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13381)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5155)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3271)
  • Health Policy (1142)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1192)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1018)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14632)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (524)
  • Neurology (4928)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (726)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4216)
  • Public and Global Health (7507)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1014)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)