Abstract
Background Pakistan dietary guidelines for better nutrition were developed to cater the local need and prevent nutritional deficiency by providing information to public about healthy eating practices.
Aims To assess the level of adherence to Pakistan Dietary Guidelines for Better Nutrition (PDGN)
Methods It was a community based study conducted in five cities with two stage stratified sampling approach. Total of 448 participants were interviewed using Food frequency questionnaire adapted to local context. Five food groups (proteins, cereals, dairy, vegetables and fruits) were taken as per country guidelines. A score point of 1 was given to each food group making a total of 5 scores. Data were analyzed using SPSS.
Results Overall adherence to PDGN was poor as none of the participants had 05 score while only 1% achieved score 04. However, adherence was more in females (B = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.24; 0.66), graduates (B = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25; 0.64), unmarried (B = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.18; 0.43), unemployed (B = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.01-0.43) and aged >50 years (B = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.08; 0.60) as compared to others. Among food groups, mean intake of cereals (carbohydrates) was high (3.38±1.39) followed by other items with fruits was least (0.76±0.91). Overall, at least one serving of discretionary food was taken by participants which was more female gender (p= 0.001), graduates (p= 0.003), high socio-economic group (p=0.001) and employed persons (p= 0.04).
Conclusion The adherence to PDGN was poor and there is a need to bring behavior change by information education and communication to the society.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funding was provided by the WHO.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the National Bioethics Committee of Pakistan.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial Support: This work was supported by WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region Office (RPPH 16-73)
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare none conflict of interest.
Authorship: IR conceived and design the study, write proposal for grant and draft manuscript. MANS revise the proposal, interpret data, facilitate data collection, add intellectual content to manuscript. NM revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. KM, AK and RI played a role in acquisition of data from field work in different cities. TR and SN performed data analysis and interpret the results.
Ethical Standards Disclosure: The study was conducted as per Helsinki declaration. The Ethical Clearance was taken from National Bioethics Committee (NBC 246). Written informed consent was taken from all participants.
Data Availability
The data will be available.
