Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Sample Pooling as an efficient strategy for SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR screening: a multicenter study in Spain

Adolfo de Salazar, Antonio Aguilera, Rocio Trastoy, Ana Fuentes, Juan Carlos Alados, Manuel Causse, Juan Carlos Galán, Antonio Moreno, Matilde Trigo, Mercedes Pérez, Carolina Roldán, Ma José Pena, Samuel Bernal, Esther Serrano-Conde, Gema Barbeito, Eva Torres, Cristina Riazzo, Jose Luis Cortes-Cuevas, Natalia Chueca, Amparo Coira, Juan M Sanchez-Calvo, Eduardo Marfil, Federico Becerra, María José Gude, Ángeles Pallarés, María Luisa Pérez Del Molino, Federico García
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20146027
Adolfo de Salazar
1Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Aguilera
2Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rocio Trastoy
2Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Fuentes
1Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Carlos Alados
3Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Cádiz, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Causse
4Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Carlos Galán
5Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Moreno
7Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti de Lugo. Lugo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matilde Trigo
8Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra. Pontevedra, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mercedes Pérez
9Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina Roldán
10Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario de Jaen. Jaen, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ma José Pena
11Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de GC, Gran Canaria, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Bernal
12Unit of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology. Hospital Universitario de Valme. Seville, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther Serrano-Conde
1Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gema Barbeito
2Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Torres
3Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Cádiz, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Riazzo
4Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose Luis Cortes-Cuevas
6Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Chueca
1Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amparo Coira
2Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan M Sanchez-Calvo
3Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Cádiz, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eduardo Marfil
4Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Becerra
6Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María José Gude
7Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti de Lugo. Lugo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ángeles Pallarés
8Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra. Pontevedra, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María Luisa Pérez Del Molino
2Clinical Microbiology Unit. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico García
1Clinical Microbiology Unit. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fegarcia@ugr.es
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance The actual demand on SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis is a current challenge for clinical laboratories. Sample pooling may help to ameliorate workload in clinical laboratories.

Objective to evaluate the efficacy of sample pooling compared to the individual analysis for the diagnosis of CoVID-19, by using different commercial platforms for nucleic acid extraction and amplification.

Design and settings observational, prospective, multicentre study across 9 Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories including SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing performed in April 2020, during the first three days after acceptance to participate.

Participants and Methods 3519 naso-oro-pharyngeal samples received at the participating laboratories were processed individually and in pools (351 pools) according to the existing methodology in each of the centres.

Results We found that 253 pools (2519 samples) were negative, and 99 pools (990 samples) were positive; with 241 positive samples (6.85%), our pooling strategy would have saved 2167 PCR tests. For 29 pools (made out of 290 samples) we found discordant results when compared to their correspondent individual samples: in 24/29 pools (30 samples), minor discordances were found; for five pools (5 samples), we found major discordances. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for pooling were 97.93%, 100%, 100% and 99.85% respectively; accuracy was 99.86% and kappa concordant coefficient was 0.988. As a result of the sample dilution effect of pooling, a loss of 2-3 Cts was observed for E, N or RdRP genes.

Conclusion we show a high efficiency of pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing, across different RNA extraction and amplification platforms, with excellent performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. We believe that our results may help clinical laboratories to respond to the actual demand and clinical need on SARS-CoV-2 testing, especially for the screening of low prevalence populations.

Question May clinical laboratories implement sample pooling as an efficient and safe strategy for SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR screening?

Findings Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for pooling were 97.93%, 100%, 100% and 99.85% respectively; accuracy was 99.86% and kappa concordant coefficient was 0.988.

Meaning Sample pooling can be used safely at clinical laboratories, especially for the screening of low prevalence populations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by Comite de Etica de la Investigacion con medicamentos de Galicia (CEIm-G) review board. Given the deidentified nature of testing, individual patient consent was not required for this study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sample Pooling as an efficient strategy for SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR screening: a multicenter study in Spain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sample Pooling as an efficient strategy for SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR screening: a multicenter study in Spain
Adolfo de Salazar, Antonio Aguilera, Rocio Trastoy, Ana Fuentes, Juan Carlos Alados, Manuel Causse, Juan Carlos Galán, Antonio Moreno, Matilde Trigo, Mercedes Pérez, Carolina Roldán, Ma José Pena, Samuel Bernal, Esther Serrano-Conde, Gema Barbeito, Eva Torres, Cristina Riazzo, Jose Luis Cortes-Cuevas, Natalia Chueca, Amparo Coira, Juan M Sanchez-Calvo, Eduardo Marfil, Federico Becerra, María José Gude, Ángeles Pallarés, María Luisa Pérez Del Molino, Federico García
medRxiv 2020.07.04.20146027; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20146027
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Sample Pooling as an efficient strategy for SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR screening: a multicenter study in Spain
Adolfo de Salazar, Antonio Aguilera, Rocio Trastoy, Ana Fuentes, Juan Carlos Alados, Manuel Causse, Juan Carlos Galán, Antonio Moreno, Matilde Trigo, Mercedes Pérez, Carolina Roldán, Ma José Pena, Samuel Bernal, Esther Serrano-Conde, Gema Barbeito, Eva Torres, Cristina Riazzo, Jose Luis Cortes-Cuevas, Natalia Chueca, Amparo Coira, Juan M Sanchez-Calvo, Eduardo Marfil, Federico Becerra, María José Gude, Ángeles Pallarés, María Luisa Pérez Del Molino, Federico García
medRxiv 2020.07.04.20146027; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20146027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
  • Epidemiology (5219)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (750)
  • Geriatric Medicine (77)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (694)
  • Health Policy (352)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5823)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
  • Medical Education (102)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (758)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (475)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (94)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (139)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (854)
  • Public and Global Health (1995)
  • Radiology and Imaging (345)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (157)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (75)
  • Surgery (108)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)