Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Global Assessment of the Relationship between Government Response Measures and COVID-19 Deaths

View ORCID ProfileThomas Hale, Andrew J. Hale, View ORCID ProfileBeatriz Kira, View ORCID ProfileAnna Petherick, View ORCID ProfileToby Phillips, View ORCID ProfileDevi Sridhar, Robin N. Thompson, Samuel Webster, View ORCID ProfileNoam Angrist
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20145334
Thomas Hale
1Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas Hale
  • For correspondence: Thomas.hale@bsg.ox.ac.uk
Andrew J. Hale
2Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatriz Kira
1Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Beatriz Kira
Anna Petherick
1Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna Petherick
Toby Phillips
1Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Toby Phillips
Devi Sridhar
3Professor, University of Edinburgh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Devi Sridhar
Robin N. Thompson
4Mathematics Institute, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Webster
5Unaffiliated
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noam Angrist
1Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Noam Angrist
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To provide an early global assessment of the impact of government stringency measures on the rate of growth in deaths from COVID-19. We hypothesized that the overall stringency of a government’s interventions and the speed of implementation would affect the growth and level of deaths related to COVID-19 in that country.

Design Observational study based on an original database of global governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Daily data was collected on a range of containment and closure policies for 170 countries from January 1, 2020 until May 27, 2020 by a team of researchers at Oxford University, UK. These data were combined into an aggregate stringency index (SI) score for each country on each day (range: 0-100). Regression was used to show correlations between the speed and strength of government stringency and deaths related to COVID-19 with a number of controls for time and country-specific demographic, health system, and economic characteristics.

Interventions Nine non-pharmaceutical interventions such as school and work closures, restrictions on international and domestic travel, public gathering bans, public information campaigns, as well as testing and contact tracing policies.

Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was deaths related to COVID-19, measured both in terms of maximum daily deaths and growth rate of daily deaths.

Results For each day of delay to reach an SI 40, the average daily growth rate in deaths was 0.087 percentage points higher (0.056 to 0.118, P<0.001). In turn, each additional point on the SI was associated with a 0.080 percentage point lower average daily growth rate (−0.121 to −0.039, P<.001). These daily differences in growth rates lead to large cumulative differences in total deaths. For example, a week delay in enacting policy measures to SI 40 would lead to 1.7 times as many deaths overall.

Conclusions A lower degree of government stringency and slower response times were associated with more deaths from COVID-19. These findings highlight the importance of non-pharmaceutical responses to COVID-19 as more robust testing, treatment, and vaccination measures are developed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received for this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Because the study did not involve human subjects or data, ethics board approval was not required.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Data-sharing statement All underlying data are freely available, and continuously updated, on the website of the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-government-response-tracker

Data Availability

All underlying data are freely available, and continuously updated, on the website of the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-government-response-tracker

https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-government-response-tracker

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 06, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global Assessment of the Relationship between Government Response Measures and COVID-19 Deaths
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Global Assessment of the Relationship between Government Response Measures and COVID-19 Deaths
Thomas Hale, Andrew J. Hale, Beatriz Kira, Anna Petherick, Toby Phillips, Devi Sridhar, Robin N. Thompson, Samuel Webster, Noam Angrist
medRxiv 2020.07.04.20145334; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20145334
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Global Assessment of the Relationship between Government Response Measures and COVID-19 Deaths
Thomas Hale, Andrew J. Hale, Beatriz Kira, Anna Petherick, Toby Phillips, Devi Sridhar, Robin N. Thompson, Samuel Webster, Noam Angrist
medRxiv 2020.07.04.20145334; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.20145334

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (158)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5275)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (197)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (700)
  • Health Policy (361)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (164)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5904)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (769)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (132)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (144)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (481)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
  • Public and Global Health (2028)
  • Radiology and Imaging (350)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)