The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?

Alastair Grant
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144840

Article usage

Article usage: July 2020 to December 2024

AbstractFullPdf
Jul 202014890384
Aug 2020136048
Sep 2020136053
Oct 2020138064
Nov 2020163097
Dec 202078064
Jan 2021247484
Feb 2021264135
Mar 2021204359
Apr 2021131522
May 2021141121
Jun 2021101619
Jul 202161231
Aug 202153731
Sep 202127216
Oct 2021332119
Nov 202129220
Dec 2021130336
Jan 2022461218
Feb 20222617
Mar 20223819
Apr 2022381126
May 202229011
Jun 202221417
Jul 20223037
Aug 202220330
Sep 202230122
Oct 202225120
Nov 20222405
Dec 20221226
Jan 20231805
Feb 202314410
Mar 202314125
Apr 202322312
May 202312125
Jun 202312528
Jul 2023403
Aug 202317138
Sep 2023942
Oct 20231402
Nov 20231643
Dec 202311515
Jan 202410110
Feb 202411413
Mar 202418626
Apr 20249918
May 20241305
Jun 202416921
Jul 2024737
Aug 20241238
Sep 202415713
Oct 202413911
Nov 20241936
Dec 2024100
Back to top
Posted July 05, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?
Alastair Grant
medRxiv 2020.07.02.20144840; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144840
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area