Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?

View ORCID ProfileAlastair Grant
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144840
Alastair Grant
School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alastair Grant
  • For correspondence: a.grant@uea.ac.uk A.Grant@uea.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The reproduction number R, the average number of people that a single individual with a contagious disease infects, is central to understanding the dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic. Values greater than one correspond to increasing rates of infection, and values less than one indicate that control measures are being effective. Here, we summarise how changes in the behaviour of individuals alter the value of R. We also use matrix models that correctly recreate distributions of times that individuals spend incubating the disease and being infective to demonstrate the accuracy of a simple approximation to estimate R directly from time series of case numbers, hospital admissions or deaths. The largest uncertainty is that the generation time of the infection is not precisely known, but this challenge also affects most of the more complex methods of calculating R. We use this approximation to examine changes in R in response to the introduction of “lockdown” restrictions in England. This suggests that there was a substantial reduction in R before large scale compulsory restrictions on economic and social activity were imposed on 23rd March 2020. From mid-April to mid-June decline of the epidemic at national and regional level has been relatively slow, despite these restrictions (R values clustered around 0.81). However, these estimates of R are consistent with the relatively high average numbers of close contacts reported by confirmed cases combined with directly measured attack rates via close interactions. This implies that a significant portion of transmission is occurring in workplaces; overcrowded housing or through close contacts that are not currently lawful, routes on which nationwide lockdown will have limited impact.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for this work

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Study consists of modelling and analysis of public data

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data are from public databases, available at locations cited in the paper

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 05, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?
Alastair Grant
medRxiv 2020.07.02.20144840; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144840
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The reproduction number R for COVID-19 in England: Why hasn’t “lockdown” been more effective?
Alastair Grant
medRxiv 2020.07.02.20144840; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144840

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (579)
  • Anesthesia (140)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1950)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (253)
  • Dermatology (185)
  • Emergency Medicine (333)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (702)
  • Epidemiology (11114)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (628)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3189)
  • Geriatric Medicine (309)
  • Health Economics (563)
  • Health Informatics (2046)
  • Health Policy (864)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (783)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (682)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12733)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (708)
  • Medical Education (317)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (336)
  • Neurology (2996)
  • Nursing (165)
  • Nutrition (465)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1559)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (185)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (914)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (382)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2793)
  • Public and Global Health (5604)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1096)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (635)
  • Respiratory Medicine (763)
  • Rheumatology (340)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (312)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (346)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)