Abstract
The tests currently used for the direct identification of SARS-CoV-2 include specimens taken from the upper and the lower respiratory tract.
In our paediatric department all children undergo both nasopharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate, performed from both nostrils, on admission and after 24 hours.
We decided to compare these two methods of detection of SARS-CoV-2. Considering nasopharyngeal aspirate as the gold standard, we calculated sensitivities and specificities of nasopharyngeal swab.
Based on our results, we suggest to prefer the collection of aspirates whenever possible.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
our study is not a prospective one
Funding Statement
No funding was secured for this study. The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
approved by the ethics committee of Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico. Approval 370_2020
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Other authors: Giada Maria Di Pietro, MD, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Via della Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy, Ph: 39 02 5503 2469, email: giada.dipietro{at}unimi.it, Ester, Luconi, MSc, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy, Ph: 39 02 5503 2469, email: ester.luconi91{at}gmail.com
Funding Source: No funding was secured for this study.
Financial Disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Data Availability
all data of the study are available
